fallacy

Matt Dillahunty Vs Trent Horn Debate Review & Reaction – Jay Dyer

 In preparation and celebration of our upcoming debate tomorrow night with Trent Horn, I will be reviewing and analyzing his debate with Matt Dillahunty on the question of the resurrection. Although this debate is not directly relevant to our debate tomorrow, it is tangentially related to Trent’s apologetic methodology. Although I have not seen […]

Theistic Fallacies & Natural Theology Refuted – Fr Dcn Dr Ananias & Jay Dyer (Half)

 Fr Dcn Dr Ananias joins me to discuss a paper critiquing natural theology and it’s assumptions as we tackle the argumentation from the Orthodox view and elucidate the transcendental argument for God. The Dr. Gereby paper is here. We will be live at 8PM CST. The full talk will be available for subscribers below.      […]

Jordan Peterson Vs Sam Harris Part 1 – Debate Review & Reaction – Jay Dyer

The next most requested debate was the series of discussions between Dr Jordan Peterson and Sam Harris, known as the Vancouver talks.  They will begin the discussion by the issue of grounding ethics and “common ground,” and whether we can do metaphysics.   The full debate is linked here. Live today at 330 PM CST […]

Debate! Pagan vs. Orthodox: Logos, Language & Metaphysics – Jay Dyer Vs CB Robertson

 I spent 3 hours reworking the audio so pretend along with the vaporware its 1987 and you are listening to an old cassette tape – nothing I can do about it, wasn’t recorded by me. I am reposting it because it’s still a good debate, and so far one of the better debates we’ve […]
The post Debate! Pagan vs. Orthodox: Logos, Language & Metaphysics – Jay Dyer Vs CB Robertson appeared first on JaysAnalysis.com.

Comparing Apologetic Methods: Classical vs. Presuppositional Arguments with Dr. Rasmussen

Join me as Dr. Josh Rasmussen and I discuss and compare classical theistic arguments, presuppositional and transcendental arguments, epistemology, and apologetics in general.  In this long anticipated discussion, these two apologists will compare and contrast two paradigms and whether the evidentialist framework actually does what it intends to do logically.  Indeed, many people come to […]

Bahnsen / Stein Debate Review & Analysis – Jay Dyer


Today we do a full analysis of the greatest debate of the 2oth century – the Bahnsen/Stein Debate. Hopefully we will cover the many misunderstandings that arise from various sectors concerning the transcendental argument, the nature of proofs and evidences, the compatibility of philosophy with Orthodoxy, and especially this form of argumentation, the word-concept fallacy, calvinism and much more. Part 2 of the other talk will be up later tomorrow or the day after.