ethical & philosophical

If we've heard only one side of a debate, we can't claim to be fully informed.

Saving the planet: the all-purpose, never-ending justification for more taxes, control, and deprivation.

Forget the shallow, conformist media narrative. There's plenty of sound, perceptive analysis.

Peer-reviewed science is contradicted by the real world.

Are activists and academics so committed to a non-existent polar bear shortage they're willing to sacrifice Inuit lives?

Refuse to talk to the reporter. Afterward, accuse her of 'multiple factual inaccuracies.' Isn't academia grand?

There's no guarantee scientific research is credible or accurate just because it has been peer-reviewed. Why is Facebook promoting this lie?

The University of Victoria receives hundreds of millions of tax dollars, yet refused to answer a single question about the firing of Susan Crockford.

Polar bear expert purged from the University of Victoria.

A new UN report relies on discredited research - and on academics who conceal vital information.