@media(max-width: 600px) {.adace_adsense_5a4b9c806dd7d {display:block !important;}}
@media(min-width: 601px) {.adace_adsense_5a4b9c806dd7d {display:block !important;}}
@media(min-width: 801px) {.adace_adsense_5a4b9c806dd7d {display:block !important;}}
@media(min-width: 961px) {.adace_adsense_5a4b9c806dd7d {display:block !important;}}
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
@media(max-width: 600px) {.adace_adsense_5a06bd1471943 {display:block !important;}}
@media(min-width: 601px) {.adace_adsense_5a06bd1471943 {display:block !important;}}
@media(min-width: 801px) {.adace_adsense_5a06bd1471943 {display:block !important;}}
@media(min-width: 961px) {.adace_adsense_5a06bd1471943 {display:block !important;}}
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
@media(max-width: 600px) {.adace_adsense_59ff9f130b97b {display:block !important;}}
@media(min-width: 601px) {.adace_adsense_59ff9f130b97b {display:block !important;}}
@media(min-width: 801px) {.adace_adsense_59ff9f130b97b {display:block !important;}}
@media(min-width: 961px) {.adace_adsense_59ff9f130b97b {display:block !important;}}
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
By Joe Lauria | Consortium News | October 29, 2017 The two sources that originated the allegations claiming that Russia meddled in the 2016 election — without providing convincing evidence — were both paid for by the Democratic National Committee, and in one instance also by the Clinton campaign: the Steele dossier and the CrowdStrike analysis of […]
The DHS-FBI intel assessment of the DNC hack concluded with “high confidence” that Guccifer 2 was a Russian operations, but provided (literally) zero evidence in support of their attribution. Ever since Guccifer 2’s surprise appearance on June 15, 2016 (one day after Crowdstrike’s announcement of the DNC hack by “Russia”), there has been a widespread consensus that Guccifer 2 was a Russian deception operation, with only a few skeptics (e.g. Jeffrey Carr questioning evidence but not necessarily conclusion; Adam Carter challenging attribution).
CrowdStrike: Five Things Everyone Is Ignoring About The Russia-DNC Story
.
The Daily Caller
The Democratic Party and mainstream media have become increasingly consumed with the narrative that Donald Trump’s election win is largely influenced by Russian hacking.
Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (“VIPS”), one of the most formidable commentary groups in the world, which includes such heavyweights as William Binney, the former NSA Technical Director for World Geopolitical & Military Analysis; Co-founder of NSA’s Signals Intelligence Automation Research Center, the former top CIA analyst Ray McGovern, and many others, has published another in its highly enlightening series of public memoranda addressed to the President of the United States.
By now it is common knowledge that, CrowdStrike, the cyber-security company hired by the DNC to investigate whether its servers were hacked by “the Russians” acted in a biased manner…hired by the DNC to look for “Russian hackers” and behold, finding “Russian hackers.”
It is also now common knowledge that CrowdStrike passed on its findings to the FBI for which a case was then presented to the American public that Russia hacked the DNC servers…problem was that the FBI relied solely on CrowdStrikes analysis of the server.
By Daniel Lazare | Consortium News | June 30, 2017 June is turning out to be the cruelest month for the Russia-gate industry. The pain began on June 8 when ex-FBI Director James Comey testified that a sensational New York Times article declaring that “members of Donald J. Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign and other Trump […]
