Bear in mind that the plane that crashed in Iran is the predecessor, with issues of it's own, to this latest piece of Boeing "engineering" Covered previously:
The Boeing 737 MAX was mocked by an employee as being "designed by clowns" more than a year before the first of two fatal air crashes, it has emerged.The disparaging comment was contained in hundreds of internal messages released by Boeing, which also revealed attempts by staff to dodge regulatory scrutiny of the development of the aircraft.In another exchange, an employee told a colleague he would not let his family fly on a 737 Max.
The aircraft has been grounded since last March after an Ethiopian Airlines plane came down outside Addis Ababa, just five months after a similar Lion Air crash in Indonesia.The two disasters claimed 346 lives.The release of the messages threaten to deepen the crisis at Boeing which is struggling to get its best-selling plane back in the air and restore public confidence. Boeing said the communications "do not reflect the company we are and need to be, and they are completely unacceptable".
The disclosure has also prompted renewed outrage from politicians in the US.House Transportation Committee chairman Peter DeFazio, who has been investigating the MAX, said the messages were "incredibly damning" and that they "paint a deeply disturbing picture".
In an April 2017 message exchange between two unnamed employees, one said: "This airplane is designed by clowns who in turn are supervised by monkeys."Some of the communications pointed to problems with the flight simulators for the aircraft.In an instant messaging exchange in February 2018 - eight months before the first of two fatal crashes, an employee tells a colleague: "Honesty is the only way in this job - integrity when lives are on the line on the aircraft and training programs shouldn't be taken with a pinch of salt."Would you put your family on a MAX simulator trained aircraft? I wouldn't".The second employee responded: "No".In a conversation in May 2018, an unnamed member of staff, in a reference to the industry regulator, the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) said: "I'll be shocked if the FAA passes this turd."
And yet, the FAA did okay "this turd"
In other emails and instant messages, employees spoke of their frustration with the company's culture, complaining about the drive to find the cheapest suppliers and "impossible schedules".
In a May 2018 message, a Boeing employee said: "I still haven't been forgiven by god for the covering up I did last year."Without referencing what it was, the worker added: "Cant do it one more time. the Pearly gates will be closed..."
Clearly Boeing products have issues. yaya : Just the usual Boeing deficiency?greencrow: SITREP : Iran’s IRGC Aerospace Chief on US casualties/damages/future retaliation steps--plus another False Flag?Briefly: Crash or take down? I'm still leaning towards crash due to defective Boeing products- But, if I was to entertain the idea of a take down it would go like this.........
PennyJanuary 9, 2020 at 6:10 AMHey Incoming!Yah, it's a lot going on in one place and space. agreed.It did occur to me that if this plane was shot down it was most likely the US, for a number of reasons.. (coming from Ukraine and in Iranian airspace) but then there is the whole host of problems with that model of plane and it's predecessor.. I looked at a number of reports yesterday and couldn't find any thing that would suggest nefariousness- other then the possibility the US will attempt to blame Iran in the court of public opinionexample: Ukrainian embassy (?)reported engine failure and then retracted their statement- All this stuff about the black box and Iran not "handing it over"? What are the protocols in this instance? I don't know. That said the position Iran is in present day... they might not trust the American military industrial complex...