In times of war, the law often does fall silent. The U.S. Supreme Court, in all its independence and courage, has endorsed concentration camps, censorship, sham military tribunals, and guilt by association at various points in its history. Textbooks and television sell us the caricature of heroic judges and inspiring courtroom debates, but in truth, … Continue reading "How the Judiciary Is Chipping Away at the War on Terror"
The post How the Judiciary Is Chipping Away at the War on Terror appeared first on Antiwar.com Original.
Source