I have been pouring over all of the reports that have come out since earlier today about this new "attack" on several oil tankers off the coast of Oman that supposedly happened this morning, and something indeed seems fishy about this entire incident... I have seen pictures over the last few decades of what actually does happen to an oil tanker when it either leaks its contents into the sea due to a collision with other ships, and I have watched other reports about oil tankers that had been attacked via aerial bombing and/or torpedo attacks, and this one in the Gulf of Oman does not only NOT make sense, but the pictures seem so peculiar as well....Well, my inner hunch that this is either an elaborate hoax or a pre-planned operation to once again vilify Iran seems to be very sound...... For according to the following report from Jim Stone, from his website at www.jimstone.is, EVERYTHING about this latest "attack" does not only not make any sense, but the pictures that the Jew spew media are trying to sell us are very phoney indeed... Here in fact is Jim's report about this "attack" and I have further thoughts and comments to follow:Well well, the mask comes off: Alex just said Iran admitted to the oil tanker attacks. Iran admitted to nothing!
Additional comment on the first photo below:
Look at it. Look for scorched paint. There is none, even with that GIANT inferno. How did that tiny little fire on the "torpedoed" oil tanker in the subsequent photo burn the hell out of the entire side of it? Answer, it did not, it is a fake event.If oil tankers really got hit by torpedoes, they should look like this:Instead, we have an AI FAKE, NO OIL TANKERS GOT HIT WITH ANYTHING.
I am going to post my initial comments on the "attacks" this morning
First of all, Iran does not operate in the area the "attacks" happened, Iran will stick to within the strait of Hormuz, this event happened too far out in the sea of Oman, out of Iran's sight, to prevent Iran from being right on top of this, screaming fake.Secondly, this has too much in common with "oil tanker attacks" that happened earlier and were proven fake, and subsequently blamed on Iran.Third of all, this happened right after Iran announced it had developed a missile system that could shoot down an F-35, which would greatly encourage a false flag hoax to justify destroying Iran before they got too many of them built, thereby having a means to thwart an attack on their country. I really think that is why this got hoaxed at this particular time. My initial report on this follows:TWO OIL TANKERS IN THE SEA OF OMAN HAVE NOTBEEN HIT BY TORPEDOES
WE ARE LOOKING AT AN AI DEEP FAKE WITH THIS.
I do not believe any tankers got torpedoed anywhere. The deep faker was not good enough, GARBAGE IN, GARBAGE OUT. IDIOT.
The more I look at this, the more there is wrong with it. Like, look at the very front of the "burned part". They were smart enough to at least slope the "burned part" backwards because the ship would have been underway at the time and the burn mark would look like that, but they were not smart enough to put that slope mark behind the "hole". How did the leaking oil outrun the ship and start burning more than a hundred feet in front of where the hole was? Looks good in a picture though. This is a really pathetic fake that presents a shocking image that may work against people who can't think or don't know what a bilge pump is.
Another problem: Considering how low the ship is sitting in the water, it is still full of oil, WHERE IS THE DAMN GUSHER? And it is not sitting low enough to indicate there's a problem, that's what the orange part of the hull is for - to show if the ship is sitting too low. The bulb is submerged but there's orange showing. It is sitting JUST RIGHT, after taking a torpedo and burning. YEP.
I'd actually like this to be a longer report, and I guess I could throw in a bunch of crap everyone already knows, like, Israel does lots of false flags and lots of troops just got positioned for an Iran attack and there's a good reason to attack Iran RIGHT NOW before they make more of those missiles that can "identify and shoot down an F-35" but EVERYONE who reads this site already knows that, and this was all so stupidly faked that it is probably better to make it short and to the point.I guess I'll sit around and wait for the war to start, a war Iran did not want and was WAY TOO SMART to start by stupidly blowing stuff up in the sea of Oman which just so happens to be barely far enough out of Iran's sight for them to not be able to call this as it is in the first few hours. I hope my post at least helps, a war is the last thing America or anyone else needs.
But wait, there's more. I'll throw this in because it is SO STUPID.
This is the "hole" the "torpedo" made.Great. If so:
1. The tone of the light proves this picture was taken at a depth far beyond an oil tankers max draft of 55 feet.2. How is the diver just sitting there peacefully without getting sucked in?3. How could the bilge pumps keep up with such a huge hole?4. There is a fire "burning" above this diver, RIGHT ABOVE THIS DIVER, where's the glow from that? And if the fire is out, it would prove this picture was taken in BRIGHT SUNLIGHT with PERFECT COLOR RENDITION because the timing of events would require it, WHICH WOULD MEAN:
5. THE COLOR OF THE SHIP IS WRONG, THAT SHOULD BE ORANGE.
And the water is not to blame for the color shift, you know, those REEF PICTURES we all love so much PROVE IT. They substituted a photo of a different sunken ship for this, one that was a POS and sunk somewhat deep, not one that was a perfectly painted tanker right on the surface as proven by the top photo, and if they want you to think the paint burned below the water line, THEY SUCK, you can see drip marks down the side of this hulk that could only come from years of neglect and the top photo proves the "attacked" ship was well cared for and did not sink enough to conceal a hole that damn big.I'd like to find where they googled that picture from.
Here is a little help with where they googled that picture from:
There are two possibilities. One is that it is a photo of a ship that was intentionally sunk to create a reef and the picture was taken after the sinking, and another is that it was not intentionally sunk, and is at a depth of more than 95 feet, beyond which coral can grow, which is why it stayed clean. Normal scuba gear can be used to depths of over a hundred feet, so the absense of coral does not mean the sinking is a recent sinking. To me, the light looks like this was taken at a depth of about 120-150 feet, which is within the spec range for recreational diving with conventional scuba gear.
Where is a ship that you can dive to, that is sunk at a depth of between 120 and 150 feet?
NTS Notes: OK, the naysayers will be all over this report that I have from Jim, but I have indeed looked more closely than ever at the pictures that the liars in the Jew spew media are trying to sell us, and they indeed appear absolutely like Computer Generated Images (CGI)And readers of this blog know by now about how I feel about "Alex Jones"... He is a shill and a Jew butt kisser who will never tell the truth about anything..... Therefore I have already dismissed his reports about this incident like anyone with real critical thinking skills should.The picture of the oil tanker itself with 1/2 of the ship looking like it was burned to a crisp is so phoney, for ships even when set ablaze do NOT look like that at all! And as Jim speculates; WHERE IS THE OIL? There should be a massive oil slick permeating from that disabled ship in the water and there is NONE! Apparently the ass clowns that doctored that image blew it big time with this one!And we all must be asking the bigger question here: WHY would Iran do such a thing? And using critical thinking skills, we can easily see WHO benefits from this "attack"....But lo and behold, we have the criminals in the US State Department "right on cue" blaming Iran for this 'attack' without giving one iota of evidence that Iran in any shape or form is involved.... This indeed smells like a rat, and that rat to me has a "Star of David" on its butt!The bottom line here is simple: Do not fall for this one! Someone came up with this concocted story and are hoping that the most stupid people on the face of this planet will fall for it and be brainwashed into supporting an attack on Iran as "retaliation" for this "attack"! Again, even the stupidest people out there should be smelling a rat and asking WHO benefits? For the answer is certainly NOT Iran...I will continue following this interesting story closely... And I am more than ever convinced that this was a poorly planned "attack" that may indeed be nothing but an elaborate staged hoax... The criminals in the US and Israel are indeed stooping to more lows in their desperate attempts to get their nice little war against Iran off and running, and we may yet see the worse from those scoundrels..More to comeNTS*Update: Apparently both Jim Stone, and myself, got caught up on the "oil" that should have been on this ship and in an "oil slick".... BUT apparently the cargo this tanker was carrying was NOT bulk petroleum but Methanol which will readily mix with water and therefore would not create a "slick" at all! Here in fact is Jim's own assessment of this fact and his "correction" at his article:MY ASSESSMENT ON THE OIL TANKER PICTURED WAS WRONG
IT PROBABLY WAS HIT AND IS NOT A DEEP FAKE, THE CARGO WAS METHANOL WHICH IS WHY IT DID NOT SHOW UP AS AN OIL SLICK. THE BURN MARKS ON THE SIDE STILL NEED EXPLAINING.
I would have continued to call B.S., but Iran did the rescue of the crews of both ships, and Iranian media itself is saying it. So obviously my assessment is wrong, my error is mostly explained by the fact that the ship was carrying methanol, which would instantly totally combine with seawater and not be visible at all. The other one hit was carrying gasoline, which would have been more visible but not like crude oil would be.
So I am going to post a big OOOOOPS, they were NOT carrying oil, which I assumed they would be if they were oil tankers. BONUS: Neither one of them sank, and (random) Iranians are saying they were tracking an Israeli sub in the area when the attacks happened. I have not seen an Iranian military assessment say that directly yet. That did not stop Pompeo from blaming Iran.
Yes, I am embarrassed, but there is at least an explanation for why I made such an error. I still don't think the hole pictured was a hole in one of these tankers however, that hole should have sunk whatever it hit and both are fine and floating, preserving all evidence for future investigation.
I for one also want to apologize to readers for making the wrong assumption that this ship was carrying petroleum... HOWEVER, it still does not cover the fact that the 'hole' made in the side of the ship from the picture above is as phoney as a $3 bill...This "hit" was indeed on purpose no matter how you slice it... The US/Israel are behind this one, and if this was indeed a strike done by a submarine, I would be dollars to donuts that it was most probably (as the Iranians have stated above) an Israeli German built submarine that launched this attack...... We have seen where Israeli submarines launched these false flag attacks in the past (USS Cole strike by an Israeli popeye missile launched from an Israeli submarine as a prime example) and I will state that the Iranians are absolutely right in their assessment!And we cannot forget that this is indeed a massive set up for Iran to take the blame... There is NO WAY in hell that the Iranians are involved in this "operation" and what we are witnessing is a classic false flag attack...... I will state clearly that in almost 100% of the previous false flag attacks where they tried to blame Iran, the US/Israel was behind the whole thing!I am an independent journalist and truth seeker, and I will admit to mistakes as I have always done in the past... And at least I have made this valuable correction in this article.... However, this attack is definitely not as the Jew spew media is trying to sell, and what we have here is 100% guaranteed set up to try to vilify Iran...More to comeNTS