I have been reading and watching all the conflicting reports so far about the Russian passenger jet that "broke up" over the Sinai peninsula in Egypt on Saturday, October 31st, and I too am looking for answers... It is interesting that the Jew spew media has been putting out constant reports that the aircraft suffered from massive "structural failure" and basically just broke up at around 33000ft altitude... But something is seriously amiss here, and as usual I smell a rat.......First, I want to present the following excellent report that comes from fellow researcher, Greg Bacon, who of course writes the blog: "Goon Squad" at www.careandwashingofthebrain.blogspot.com... The article is entitled: "Israeli Airforce Was Practicing Shooting Down Planes Near Sinai And Pics Of Scorched Russian Plane Debris", and it shows some interesting evidence that the plane did not "break up due to mechanical failure" as the liars in the Jew spew media promote, and in fact shows clear evidence of either a bomb on board or the plane being hit by a missile! Here is Greg's article right here for everyone to analyze for themselves:
Monday, November 2, 2015
Israeli Air Force Was Practicing Shooting Down Planes Near Sinai and Pics of Scorched Russian Plane Debris
First, some pics of the downed Russian jetliner, showing debris that's been subjected to fire, as evidenced by the scorching:RT reporter describes debris as being completely melted at the 50 second mark:The full "RT" story and video hereWhat could cause something this catastrophic? How about the Israeli's having a 'Blue Flag' military air exercise just minutes away, which included shooting at aircraft?
Israel hosts its largest-ever international air force exerciseIsraeli, American, Greek, and Polish air personnel square off against a fictional enemy state in two-week drillAir forces from around the world have gathered deep in the Arava desert in the south of Israel for the past week and a half to take part in the largest aerial exercise in the history of the Israeli Air Force.The “Blue Flag” exercise, which is continuing through November 3, pits the Israeli Air Force, the United States Air Force, Greece’s Hellenic Air Force and the Polish Air Force against a fictional enemy state, the captain in charge of all IAF exercises told The Times of Israel Thursday night.Though the exercise began on October 18, planning for it started nearly eight months ago, the Israeli official said, with an IAF representative contacting each participating country and initially asking, “What do you want to train for?”Those requests came together to form the plan for “Blue Flag,” which sent Israeli and American F-15 squadrons, along with Israeli, Hellenic and Polish F-16 squadrons, flying through nearly all of Israel’s air space, firing simulated weapons against fictional enemy missile launchers, convoys and aircraft, he said.
And more:
Metrojet official says only external impact on plane could have caused crash in EgyptST. PETERSBURG — Only an external impact could have caused a Russian plane to dive into the Egyptian desert, killing all 224 people on board, the airline said Monday, adding to a series of incomplete and confusing statements from investigators that left unclear why the plane broke up in mid-flight."We rule out a technical fault of the plane or a pilot error," said Alexander Smirnov, deputy general director of Metrojet. "The only possible explanation could be an external impact on the airplane." When planes do break up in midair, experts say it's usually because of one of three factors: a catastrophic weather event, a midair collision or an external threat, such as a bomb or a missile.British military analyst Paul Beaver said he thought the crash was most likely caused by a bomb on board, saying he was certain IS does not possess a missile system — such as the Russian BUK — capable of hitting the plane.
And still more:ISRAEL CAUSED RUSSIAN METROJET CRASH IN EGYPT? It looks as though Israel and its friends may have brought down the Russian Metrojet plane which crashed in Egypt on 31 October 2015.Israel is angry that Russia has been frustrating its plans for Syria. The Israeli Defence Forces has confirmed that it had intelligence assets in the region at the time of the crash. Egypt's civil aviation minister Hossam Kamal said communications between the pilot and air traffic controllers were 'normal' ahead of the disaster.'There was nothing abnormal... and the pilot didn't ask to change the plane's route,' he said, adding that the controllers recorded no distress calls.His comments contradicted earlier claims that the pilot had reported technical difficulties and made clear his intention to land at the nearest airport.Professor Michael Clarke, Director General of the Royal United Services Institute says that early indications suggest that the jet may have been destroyed by a bomb on the aircraft."Early reports said it split into two and that suggests a catastrophic failure, not a mechanical failure, but perhaps an explosion on board, so I would be much more inclined to think, if we have to guess at this stage, it is much more likely to have been a bomb on board than a missile fired from the ground.NTS Notes: Second, I was over at Jim Stone's website (www.jimstone.is) to see if Jim had his own take on this "crash"... And yes, Jim and I do have our differences of opinions from time to time, but his report, that I have right here for all of my own readers to view makes perfect sense in regard to this Russian plane being shot out of the sky by an Israeli missile:*Update, November 3rd, 2015... This newest section was just added to Jim's blog just yesterday... It adds some most interesting material about this plane "crash" indeed:
Al Quaida promising another 911 (to scare people after Israel shot that plane down)
All the experts agree the plane did not crash naturally now and was blown out of the sky, and satellites even picked up the heat flash from the blast
My comment: Interesting it is that a satellite was looking in just the right spot when that happened! Interesting indeed!
Video of shoot down definitely authentic I finally got a high bandwidth connection and looked at all the pictures and video. It appears to me that the shoot down video is authentic. First of all, the shakiness of different versions, the camera focus, all of it confirms it as authentic. If it was faked, it simply would not have come out the way it did. All factors that would be present photographically are there. It was filmed with medium quality super zoom cameras, and more than one, from more than one vantage point. Also, in confirmation of claims, the engines really were blasted off both wings. Some jet engines can drop off the plane in the event of catastrophic failure (as a design feature) to help prevent passenger injury from flying parts. Both engines do not appear to be anywhere near the main wreckage, and appear to have fallen by themselves far from the wings. This proves a massive explosion, which sheared them off the plane, because only that or full blown engine explosions will provide enough of a shock to cause this to happen. RUSSIA IS NOT STUPID, AND KNOWS THIS. If I know it, they know it and they are keeping their mouths shut until they can put enough of the plane back together to find out exactly where the explosion happened. When they have their answer, it will include the make, model, and serial number of the missile or bomb, who provided it, who was likely to have had it, the whole 9 yards, and at that time appropriate action will be taken. This type of analysis takes a while, so it might even be months before we get the final answer. I am not going to be as careful as the Russians, because my hit rate is high enough anyway, I do not need the details to say the obvious. Here it is in a nut shell: The aircraft has certainly been brought down by an explosion. No if's or buts. With almost 100 percent certainty, it was a missile that did this. And it was an intelligent missile that can analyze a plane and know where to hit it perfectly to assure destruction, it was not a simple heat seeker going after a hot spot. And only scant few nations have such missiles, and in that area, only Israel had them in stock ready to go as part of their national defense, and if it was not Israel firing this from Israeli soil, it was Israeli/American provided. Obviously Egypt has a decent version of this type of missile as well, but it can be flatly stated they certainly did not do this.The type of missile that did this could never have been hidden from Egyptian forces in the area unless it was done with American style expertise, NO WAY would any rag tag band of jihadists do it. NO WAY would any rag-tag band of jihadists know it was a Russian plane and NO WAY would they have ever filmed it, this was done by the pros and the story line is a complete ruse. It was stated early on that there was no way ISIS did it and that there would not be a missile because the missile video did not get released to the public via any venue ISIS uses. That is another smoking gun, no rag tag band of jihadists did this, no rag tag band of jihadists got accurate info on what the plane was, yet there it is, plain as day on video getting nailed, it is definitely real, and that leaves TWO OPTIONS: America and Israel. No way out of it. And I need to stress a point here - it is freakishly difficult to film something like this happening live, no matter how good the camera is. The fact any video of this got made at all shows a degree of professionalism beyond the average joe. The cameras had their limits, but the people handling them were quite good, despite obvious camera shake. It is not a walk in the park to keep a half degree of sky in a camera lens, that takes really good hands which I seriously doubt any hack could ever pull off. It appears to me that professional photographers did this either with cheap tripods or very good supported handheld with mediocre equipment to make it all seem low key. Even high end professional gear properly mounted is hard to hold steady with such a shot, the fact it at least stayed in frame the whole time from multiple vantage points is another smoking gun.NTS Note, November 3rd, 2015: Here is supposedly that video that shows the shoot down "live"... .Some claim it is false and from a "previous" shooting down (If so when then???) and it definitely shows the photographer making the video able to follow the plane right up to the explosion and the plane falling out of the sky... Judge for yourselves about whether or not it is authentic:Ok, now they are coming around. First they said it was mechanical. Then they said that for some mysterious reason, the plane broke up in the air. Now they are saying it was a bomb in the cargo bay. I'd call that possible, but not the most probable. I still say missile, but if they at least say bomb that will be enough. Why would I say missile and not bomb? Because of where the fuel went, the damage characteristics, airport security, and the problems with getting a bomb aboard in addition to the fact that there is video of this plane exploding in the air. Whoever did this knew exactly where the plane would explode to get video of it, and that requires either a very high degree of sophistication, or complete control of the situation via line of sight and a missile launch. The fact that Israel and America are ISIS, and have missiles that can do this finish my initial conclusion. I would not be surprised if it was a bomb, but still see a missile as more probable.If it was a bomb, it will be possible to figure out. And if it was a bomb, the first question should be: Did an Israeli "security firm" provide the "security" (NOT) for the airport? Israelis have a history of providing "security" that is really just cover for clandestine ops. If it was a bomb, this should be the first thing asked. The fact ISIS took credit for this says it all anyway, yeah, we at least have a bomb now, someone took credit, and who is ISIS?It will be easy to know if it was a bomb or missile. This is easy to determine. If it was a missile, there will be penetration markings where the bent metal turns inward on the plane. If these markings exist, it will prove a missile. And if Russia does the investigation, this will not be hidden. They found these markings on the wreckage from TWA-800 but the whitewash was so extremely well done that they did not become huge public knowledge (though the alternative media did catch this).Why would this all come around in the MSM to the way I said it had to be right from the start, this time? Because Russia is not stupid, is not controlled, and the MSM just can't get away with lying about it this time. I am sure that if this plane was shot down over America it would have been a pilot suicide, or "whirl winds" off of another plane's wing tips that caused it and Russia would not have been allowed any closer to the crash than the Canadian border. We now have bodies and wreckage spread out over an area that is 8 kilometers long and 4 kilometers wide, just like what happens on the ground when someone throws confetti. If it was a bomb in the cargo hold, it had to have used advanced explosives, you would never do that with a pressure cooker.
Beheading 2 big lies
When anything big happens, such as the U.S./Israeli/whoever shootdown of a Russian airliner, troll teams test the water in think tanks trying to dream up whatever lie works. The two big lies are mechanical failure, and "tail strike damage" resulting in the tail falling off and causing the crash. Let's slay those quickly here . . . . . .1. How can the tail falling off rupture all forward mounted fuel tanks, spray fuel all over the cabin and cause the plane to fall to the ground in a flaming mess, with pieces scattered everywhere? The reality in the wreckage proves a missile strike, if the tail fell off there would be two big pieces on the ground showing almost all of an airplane in the two, not two big pieces with a bunch of little pieces that have been burned to smithereens scattered across a 5 KM radius. And the other big lie being told was : 2. The plane was a hunk-o-junk the pilot complained about all the time, and he even radioed in a malfunction (during some gray period near the end that is never defined). And I'll tell you why it was never defined: Because the plane went from cruising speed to terminal falling velocity in a fraction of a minute, and if the pilot did get word out of a malfunction, he did so while experiencing no less than 2 g's of deceleration as the fragments of the plane caught the wind and the wires ripped out of the radio. There was no time to assess what happened, and since missile strikes are not on everyone's mind when they go for a ride, he figured something happened with the plane. Well, the plane was NOT a hunk - o - junk. France made it. It was inspected regularly and still within its service life. The fact the pilots were not happy with it because it was hard to start is irrelevant, if a car won't start easily it does not mean that the back doors are going to fall off on the highway all by themselves.And "the tail blew out" lie really irks me, because: It is based upon a single incident where a different airplane did not get a proper inspection after it struck it's tail on the ground during landing, and a big piece blew out of it in flight. This happened ONE TIME in all of aviation history, and now we are supposed to believe that a Russian airline with no history of tail strikes suffered the exact same fate "just because" while it was flying near very hostile territory? Figure the odds, the white wash crew just chaps me. All of the so-called anomalies, such as seam failures and GEE, look at how this ripped out here" are EXACTLY WHAT WILL HAPPEN IN A MISSILE STRIKE WHEN THE WIND CATCHES ON A RIPPED OPEN CABIN, pointing at damage caused by wind shredding the plane after a blast ripped it open and then saying Oh, that's what caused it all is FRAUD pure and simple. The key piece of info that proves a missile strike is the flaming wreckage, having the tail fall off won't rip the fuel tanks open, spray fuel all over the cabin and then magically light it all on fire somehow. But they won't mention that. They just gotta bury this, and it might work for the couch potatoes but Russia is not stupid.
UPDATE: CONFIRMED: Russia announced (after this plane shoot down) that absolutely no foreign troops would be allowed in Syria without Assad's consent. This announcement means that Russia will now take direct action against American troops. THAT CINCHES IT, RUSSIA KNOWS * WELL WHO SHOT THAT PLANE DOWN and even if the political whitewash machine won't hang that fact out on the clothesline, Russia's subsequent action says it all. MAIN REPORT FOLLOWS, THIS ONE IS A DOOZIE:
SUSPICIOUS: Russian passenger jet goes down with 224 aboard over the Sinai close to Israeli borderUPDATE: CONFIRMED: PLANE SHOT DOWN BY MISSILE WHILE AT CRUISING ALTITUDE
NO MATTER WHAT THE WHITEWASH IS, THEY WILL NEVER WIGGLE OUT OF THIS ONE
Here is why: The plane, which "suddenly fell like a rock" was cruising at 30,000 feet right before it did, AND BODIES WERE FOUND OVER A FIVE KILOMETER RADIUS. Folks, there is only ONE WAY this can happen, and that is if an intelligent missile sought the plane's center of mass, exploded, and threw bodies in all directions from far far up. That is the only way they could possibly be spread out over a five kilometer radius. A bomb in the cargo bay would have to get a lucky shot to do that, and be absolutely HUGE. Not probable. NO MATTER THE WHITE WASH, CASE CLOSED. Now Egypt's "ISIS" is claiming responsibility. This means Israel or the U.S. did it. Since this happened within missile strike range of Israel, well, what do you think? This plane had only Russians aboard, which virtually assures it was only important people aboard because normal flights have people from more than one country on them. Who would know that before blowing this plane up? Certainly not ISIS, if ISIS was the rag tag band claimed, they would be clueless about what they were shooting at. How would they bag the perfect Russian aircraft, and where did such a missile come from? Forget the "engine problem" whitewash, it is unrelated and I looked into this, the crew only had problems starting the engines, once running they were fine and did not have a history of blowing people out of the airplane over a 5 KM radius . . . . . . which would be impossible anyway, an engine is not even able to get shrapnel into the passenger cabin, they are tested for that and France built the aircraft. Update: Israel has stated they had intelligence assets on the ground where the plane went down. This is likely to ruin any investigation and could actually be the cause of the crash to begin with.A Russian Airbus A321 went off radar while over the Sinai peninsula 23 minutes after takeoff with 217 Russian passengers and 7 Russian crew. RT has reported the plane had tourists aboard, but in addition to this the plane had only Russians aboard, which strongly indicates this was a very important aircraft flown out of Egypt for a purpose with important people aboard. Most likely they were either important to Russia's government and/or Russian defense or business, this is the only probable way both the passengers and crew were entirely Russian. If the plane was not flown for a specific official purpose, the passengers would have most likely been of mixed origin. RT has reported that the crew complained of engine problems before takeoff, and that they requested to land in Cairo, HOWEVER, the crash characteristics match a missile strike and not engine problems for the following reason - obvious complete structural failure of the airframe caused the plane to drop like a rock IN FLAMES after it hit cruising altitude at 30,000 feet. A plane cannot just fall out of the sky from 30,000 feet like this one did unless the wings are missing, if this was an engine failure it would have taken this aircraft a half hour to crash from that altitude, with full dialog from the pilots all the way down. Instead, radar tracked this plane falling like a rock, with no communication from the pilots while it did so, until it vanished from radar at 5,000 feet and fell in the mountains. There are survivors this time, so there will be stories told if any of them make it. This plane crashed in Egypt, which means the Israelis will be hindered in killing survivors to prevent testimony if they did shoot this plane down. UPDATE: Early rescue teams heard voices in the main wreckage, but are now reporting no survivors. THAT is suspicious. . . . .For now, Russia is playing it cool saying the plane went down due to an engine failure, but this simply does not wash, if it hit 30,000 feet it could have landed in Israel, Egypt, Jordan and possibly other places before it ran out of altitude, or at worst even in the ocean to improve it's chances if it still had it's wings. This one is suspicious to say the least and I would not doubt Israel did this one to settle a Syria grudge and will remain suspicious no matter what the "official story" ends up being. If the black boxes have bad news aboard, this could easily be the spark that does world war 3. If Israel did shoot this plane down, it will be a wrestling match between Israel and Russia for these black boxes, even if via Israeli infiltrators in Egypt's investigation if Egypt does the investigation. The best possible course is for Russia to get there ASAP and handle this one because no one can be trusted to do this type of investigation anymore. If Israel shot this plane down, it would end up being be another "suicide pilot" story if Russia does not handle this correctly.NTS Notes: I must admit that at first I did believe that the most probable cause for this plane to crash was most logically due to massive "structural failure" due to what may have been a damaged rear tail..... But the charred ruins and the way the plane "disintegrated" does not jive with the plane crashing due to break up from structural damage! Again, the evidence is clear that the Israelis were indeed conducting a massive military drill just over the border in Israel at exactly the same time this plane was making its flight over Sinai.... And how many times before have we seen these type of "crashes" when "military drills" are being conducted.. Honestly, too many....The facts are simple... Everything that we are hearing right now from the liars at the Jew spew media does not make sense, and I do sense a cover up in progress to hide the real truth... .We all know by now that Russia's intervention into Syria has truly pissed off the Americans and the Israelis, and therefore for Israel to fire a missile into a Russian passenger jet could just be the psycho Jewish way of saying to the Russians "Don't mess with us!"...... I would not put it past them considering their long history of false flags all over the planet....And finally, do not ever give me the crap that the fraud known as "ISIS" shot down this aircraft.. Anyone with at least 1/2 a brain knows by now that "ISIS" is and always has been a complete fraud and nothing more than a propaganda tool used by the US and Israel to try to scare people into supporting their equally fraudulent "war on terror"..... The facts are that ISIS = US/Israel and always has been.... Again, as more and more evidence comes out that brings the truth to light about this airplane crash, I will try my best to bring it forward for all to see here... Stay tuned, for there is definitely...More to comeNTS*Update November 3rd, 2015: Many articles are now surfacing claiming this was NOT a shoot down by a missile attack (Possibly to cover up for the criminal Israeli involvement?) and yes, there are some good points to be made in support of this being a "bomb" on board the aircraft... BUT if it was a bombing, then who is responsible and who has the most to gain by destroying this Russian aircraft? If you add it all up and see who gains, we again are looking at the psycho state of Israel itself at fault!