War For Water: NATO Drills For War In “Cerasia”

North Atlantic Treaty Organization
Allied Command Transformation/Joint Warfare Centre

March 3, 2015
SOROTAN will challenge NATO against hybrid threats
Developed by Allied Command Transformation’s (ACT) Joint Warfare Centre (JWC), NATO’s new training scenario will be launched during TRIDENT JUNCTURE 15 (TRJE 15), the Alliance’s largest exercise this year.
TRJE15 is sponsored by ACT.
Dubbed “SOROTAN”, the new scenario reflects a very complex threat environment in the fictional “Cerasia” region and looks to challenge NATO forces with a wide range of conventional and unconventional threats, including hybrid warfare.
Unlike the “SKOLKAN” scenario, which presents a complex Article 5 Collective Defence of a NATO Member Nation, SOROTAN provides a setting that enables an out-of-area, non-Article 5 Crisis Response Operation to bring a border war to an end before it expands to the entire region.
Scenario Theme: War over Water
“The catalyst for conflict in the Cerasia region is based upon water,” said British Navy Commander Tristan Lovering MBE, JWC’s Chief Main Events List and Main Incidents List (MEL/MIL) for TRJE 15.
“With desertification, dry aquifers, riparian disputes and an ever diminishing resource, Kamon, the aggressor country in the region, refuses international arbitration and invades southwards in order to seize key dams in Lakuta, which was caught ill-prepared to counter the invasion.”
Based on SOROTAN, exercise TRJE 15 will certify Allied Joint Force Command Brunssum (JFC Brunssum) to lead the NATO Response Force (NRF) in 2016; an up to 30,000-strong force of land, air, sea and special force components, ready to deploy on short notice wherever needed.
SOROTAN was formed on an 18-month cycle, incorporating what NATO identifies as the greatest challenges to its Member and Partner nations, based on the Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR) Annual Guidance on Education, Training, Exercises and Evaluation (SAGE).
Its use in TRJE 15 was approved by German Army General Hans-Lothar Domröse, Commander JFCB, in June 2014.
SOROTAN’s developers at JWC are a small team of uniformed officers and civilian experts.
Based on Lessons from contemporary Conflicts
“The scenario has harnessed the talents and experience of a wide range of experts. In effect, what we do is to take lessons identified from contemporary conflicts and weave them into a bespoke security scenario,” said Mr. Bruce Foster, a scenario specialist at JWC, adding: “With SOROTAN, several firsts have taken place in JWC such as war-gaming the STARTEX (Start of Exercise) conditions, multi-variant analysis of countries down to the provincial level and STRIKFORNATO (SFN) providing a dedicated Opposing Forces (OPFOR) staff. The scenario is flexible; it incorporates a myriad of Lessons Identified from contemporary conflicts and provides commanders with a wide range of operational level dilemmas. In particular, the Training Audience will be challenged to deliver coherency between lethal and non-lethal effects against a sophisticated, hybrid threat.”
The SOROTAN scenario sees a standoff in East Cerasia and a legion of problems caused by the standoff, including increasing regional instability, violation of territorial integrity and a deteriorating humanitarian situation. Additionally, enemy ships and aircraft threatening freedom of navigation pose a constant risk for high-intensity conflict in the Red Sea.
Commander Lovering noted that the scenario was not only about a conflict over scarce resources and the inevitable humanitarian consequences, but that it was also a “battle for the narrative.”
Indeed, an aggressive military dictatorship, Kamon, together with its proxies and surface-to-air missile systems, wage a hybrid war in the region while simultaneously carrying out a negative ‘strategic communication’ narrative that targets its own people and the international opinion.
“The scenario tests NATO operational level Training Audiences’ capabilities to work through the ambiguities that surround hybrid warfare as seen practiced today by various potential NATO competitor nations,” highlighted U.S. Army Lieutenant Colonel Charles Kurz, an exercise-planner at JWC.
Understanding the Limits of Military Engagement
He continued: “The operational dilemmas provided to NATO Training Audiences include analysing threat Courses of Action, when the threat nation retains plausible deniability of its true strategic goals. The focus is on understanding the limits of military engagement when working against hybrid threats, and developing operational Courses of Action that walk the necessary fine line between too much or too little kinetic actions inherent with trying to bring a hybrid war scenario to a successful political denouement. Also important is working inside an information environment that is risky both in NATO home countries as well as in the region where the intervention is occurring.”
When it comes to SOROTAN, the name “Cerasia” can be misleading as it had been the main geographical setting for NATO’s operational level exercises between 2008 and 2012. But, that’s as far as the comparison goes.
“Cerasia” in SOROTAN was designed and developed through the lens of a PMESII (Political, Military, Economic, Social, Information and Infrastructure) construct. It captures the complexities of conventional and unconventional threats, food insecurity, population displacements, cyber-attacks, chemical warfare and information war, and incorporates them all into the complex training environment of TRJE 15, supported by JWC’s advanced computer simulations.

German Army Major General Reinhard Wolski, Commander JWC, will be directing the Command Post Exercise (CPX) portion of TRJE 15 in October, which will involve more than 2,000 personnel, and that will be followed by a two-week joint LIVEX in November, co-directed by NATO’s Allied Air Command (AIRCOM), Allied Land Command (LANDCOM) and Allied Maritime Command (MARCOM) – with participation of more than 25,000 troops.

Source