https://archive.org/details/investigative_corona_committee_date_94
----------------
Corona_Fakten response to the 94th Corona Committee broadcast by Prof. Ulrike Kämmerer
"The control experiment discussed in the 94th Corona Committee broadcast by Prof. Ulrike Kämmerer !!
The so-called cytopathic effect (CPE), which is supposed to be induced in the laboratory, serves as the first indirect proof. What is this effect, which virologists equate with proof of a disease-causing virus?
Virologists kill tissue unnoticed in the laboratory
The virologists do not use the word "isolation" in the true sense of the word isolation and become suspiciously nervous when asked about it. They understand "isolation" to mean the creation of an effect in the laboratory, the so-called cytopathic effect, which they also call "
a) infection
b) Evidence of the presence of a virus
c) Evidence of its proliferation
d) Interpret evidence of the destructive power of the assumed virus.
In reality, they kill tissues and cells in the laboratory unnoticed and unconsciously - by starvation and poisoning. This circumstance causes a morphological change in the supposedly "infected" cells.
The alleged cultivation of the virus
This confluence is referred to as giant cell formation and the "cytopathic effect". This result of many violent and insane steps (in vitro) is interpreted as central evidence for the "presence, isolation, multiplication etc." of the suspected virus. Those involved then claim that they succeeded in cultivating the virus.
However, the control experiment clearly shows that this effect is not clear proof of the presence of viruses. We have shown in our correspondence that none of the virologists conducted these control experiments and therefore did not notice their wrong conclusions
We have described more about the cytopathic effect in detail in our article with various control experiments
-Power work - entry into the refutation of the virus claim"
Source:google translate: https://t.me/Corona_Fakten/847
”————-
"With the 7 core points that virologists use to detect a virus, they have actually achieved the opposite of what they intended - on a scientific basis they almost refuted the virus existence claims.
This article describes the following core elements in detail:
How are a virus and a corona virus defined?What does scientific work mean and what are the scientifically stipulated rules?What are scientific control experiments and what should they look like?The so-called cytopathic effect (CPE), which is supposed to be induced in the laboratory, serves as the first indirect proof.The sequence alignment serves as a second indirect proof.Information on the photos of the viruses claimed to be isolated.The PCR test - what does it prove and what significance does it have? [38]”
How are a virus and a corona virus defined?- How are a virus and a corona virus defined?
- How are sequences defined in this context?
- How do the sequence detection methods known as PCR, RT-PCR and real-time RT-PCR work?
- When can proof of the presence of sequences in humans be passed off as proof of the presence of a virus?
- How is the existence of a virus scientifically proven?
Terms:
- In science, a virus is defined by its specific genetic material that only belongs to this virus.
- The genetic material of a virus is also referred to as a viral strand of genetic material, as a viral genetic molecule or as its genome.
- The viral genetic material of a virus sequentially contains the different genetic sequences for the formation of the different viral proteins, which are referred to as viral genes.
- The genetic material of a virus can consist of one of two types of genetic molecules – DNA or RNA.
- Corona viruses are defined as consisting of a specific RNA molecule surrounded by an envelope.
- The genetic material of a specific virus is defined by its precisely determined length and the exact determination of the structure of the viral genetic strand.
- The composition of the genome of a virus results from the exact determination of the number and the specific sequence of the four building blocks that make up a genome. The four building blocks of genetic material are called nucleotides.
- The process of determining the specific sequence of the four building blocks of a genetic material is known as sequencing.
- The result of determining the sequence of the building blocks of a hereditary substance is referred to as a sequence or as a genetic sequence.
- Disease-causing viruses are defined by the fact that their sequence is unique and does not occur in healthy organisms.
- In order to be able to prove and determine the presence of the genetic material of a virus, according to the laws of thought and the logic that precedes every science as a fundamental rule, this virus must be isolated and available in pure form so that the cell's own gene sequences are not misinterpreted as components of a virus.
- Determining the sequence of a genetic substance is only possible if it is in the form of DNA.
- In order to be able to determine the sequence of a genetic substance that is in the form of RNA, it must first be biochemically converted into DNA.
- The process of converting a genetic substance from RNA to DNA is called "reverse transcription" and is abbreviated to "RT".
- The presence and length of a genetic material is determined by separating it lengthwise in an electric field. Short stretches move faster, longer ones slower. At the same time, in order to be able to determine the length of the genetic material to be examined, pieces of genetic material of known length are added. This reliable standard technique for detecting and determining the length of genetic material is called "gel electrophoresis".
- If the concentration of a certain genetic material is too low to be detectable using the technique of "gel electrophoresis", it can be reproduced indefinitely using the technique of unlimited amplification of DNA, known as the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). be propagated. In this way, undetectable DNA can be visualized in gel electrophoresis. This is a prerequisite for making genetic material accessible for further investigations, above all for the subsequent, crucial determination of its length and sequence. This method is also abbreviated as PCR.
- The inventor of the PCR technique, Karry Mullis, who received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for this in 1993, pointed out early on that this method, which was developed for clean room analysis in computer chip factories, is very error-prone. [1] He also pointed out in his Nobel Prize speech, which is documented on the Nobel Prize Committee website, that there is no verifiable, actual scientific evidence [2] that the genetic substance called the genome of HIV actually exists triggers an immune deficiency or one of the various diseases that are inadmissibly summarized under the term "AIDS" and treated with highly toxic chemotherapy. He pointed out that there is only a consensus among scientists involved that "HIV" would trigger an immune deficiency. [3]
- In order to be able to amplify DNA using the PCR technique, knowledge of the composition and sequence of the DNA is required. DNA can only be amplified using PCR if short, artificially produced gene fragments are attached to the beginning and end of the DNA, which correspond exactly to the sequence of the beginning and end of the DNA to be amplified
In fact, virology has nothing more to offer than indirect evidence, which it interprets as viral, i.e. "disease-causing" only because those involved suffer from an obsessive thinking that viruses must exist because the "prevailing opinion in biology/ Medicine" cannot offer any real explanations for the phenomena attributed to viruses. They don't notice their extremely unscientific actions and the associated self-deception and deception of others.
If the necessary control experiments are not available, the publication cannot and must not be described as scientific. Exactly this misconduct led to or reinforced the undesirable development within virology. Among other things, processes involving the death of tissue and cells in the reagent were misinterpreted as the presence of viruses and this error was not noticed. If those responsible had carried out the necessary control experiments, they would have noticed this immediately. A good analysis of this problem can be found here:
Prof. Harald Walach - What is a "scientific fact"? A small case study: The "measles trial" [7]"
Source - google translate from German article -https://telegra.ph/Alle-Publikationen-auf-einem-Blick---Warum-diese-Arb…
---------------
"Corona_Fakten evaluates the statements made by prof. Ulrike Kämmerer at the 94th Corona Committee Meeting - Part 1 of 2 !!
1. Prof. Ulrike Kämmerer shows her laboratory, where she has been working with bacteria and phages that are added to the viruses for 30 years. "And that's how you would work with viruses." She simply transfers her bacterial model to the viruses, which is a fallacy.
dr Stefan Lanka Discovered a meaningful biological structure that served as a model for virologists in the form of the useful "bacteriophage" (from 1954), when all claims, ideas and, above all, the alleged attempts at transmission turned out to be wrong
2 .Lanka discovered the "brown algae virus". So there are viruses. If he now sees things differently, he must withdraw his work or add an erratum, which is the norm, says Prof. Kämmerer.dr Stefan Lanka spoke several times about his publication and explained why it does not contain any pathogenic structure. You can read some of the answers in the following article.
-About the virus church
as dr Lanka recognized (through his teacher Prof. Fritz Pohl) that they are symbionts and that they do not have any pathogenic properties, his superiors at the University of Konstanz made it a condition not to publicly deny the HI virus, then he would become one get job. He didn't want to abjure and lie along. His boss even came home and talked to his mother in the garden to change his mind. He renounced his career and since 1995 has devoted himself to the question of virus evidence.
3.Prof. Kämmer: "One should believe what has been worked out, otherwise one could not believe anything."Faith is not knowledge and not science, but the abolition of knowledge. The comprehensive documentation of the control experiments for a procedure is a logical and legal (compliance with the scientific rules prescribed in the employment contracts) prerequisite for being able to describe the results of a procedure as scientific. By publishing the previous correspondence with leading virologists worldwide, we have proven that precisely these control experiments were not carried out and that they are all unscientific without exception.
4 Prof. Kämmerer: "Viruses exist until control experiments have proven that they don't exist."The reversal of the burden of proof applied here is unscientific. Anyone who claims that there are specifically pathogenic viruses has the burden of proof, not the other way around. In virology, no scientific specifications are observed. We have shown through control experiments that the claims made by the virologists are wrong and that they themselves did not carry out or document any control experiments. They openly admitted this!
-here for the control experiments
In Germany, the RKI is even legally obliged by the IfSG and the rules of the DFG to carry out all control experiments and to document them transparently. We published the correspondence with the RKI, which openly admitted that they did not carry out any research into the existence of the virus or control tests, despite the obligation to publish.
-DFG - Code of Good Scientific Practice "Guidelines for Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice"
- DFG: Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice | [Archived]
-RKI confirms: Neither virus existence research nor control experiments carried out➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
-more on @Corona_Fakten"
Source :google translate https://t.me/Corona_Fakten/848
---------
"Corona_Fakten evaluates the statements made by prof. Ulrike Kämmerer at the 94th Corona Committee Meeting - Part 2 of 2 !!
5.Prof. Kämmer: "If Lanka and Kaufman say the control experiments would end Corona immediately, why isn't it over yet?
She could have given the answer herself. Because even Corona critics (without exception) refused to carry out the control experiments with us when we all, including Prof. Kämmer, offered to carry them out at our expense, document them and publish them together, so that the pressure on the Growing mainstream virologists, all we got was rejection.
Prof. Ulrike Kämmer and friends still have the chance, let's hope they are serious. p.s. The Corona Committee should also have enough money.
6.Dr. Lanka also had the control exp privately. to the measles virus: You can find this in our article, among other things:
-Court records confirm: No scientific evidence for the existence of the measles virus
7.Prof. Ulrike Kämmer unfortunately did not have the original publication at hand, but used Dr. cowan She could have asked us, we would of course have made it available to her free of charge. On our channel I always offer a contact person 24/7.
The original publication can be found here by anyone who wants to find it-Control experiment phase 1 - Wissenschaftplus Magazin 2021 Issue 2 Page 52
-Control experiment phase 2 - Wissenschaftplus Magazin 2021 Issue 4 Page 28 (The genome of SARS-CoV-2 was constructed purely by calculation - A guide to refutation)
8 .In our article "Quota Critics" we intentionally included all the necessary sources that would have been relevant to the Corona Committee, it's a pity that none of the gentlemen read them, then you wouldn't have wrong or half-baked sources for the original -Work and the like have to fall back.
9 .A request to the Corona Committee, our contact person on Telegram @NotIsolate is always at your disposal, next time use this opportunity, then we can clear up problems or incomprehensibility in advance. In our book "The Contemporary Witnesses Volume 1.0", we have compiled the most important information for getting started with the refutation of the virus existence claim. We will be happy to send you one free of charge if our shipment did not reach you."➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
-more on @Corona_Fakten
Source: google translate :https://t.me/Corona_Fakten/849
-------------
"We are looking for dialogue with Prof. Ulrike Kämmerer !!
The statements made by Prof. Kämmerer in the 94th meeting of the Corona Committee give us hope. According to her own statement that she would like to be there when it comes to carrying out the control experiments and publishing them together, we would like to shake hands.
-Discuss the previous control experiments together, it will also become clear why we used yeast
-carry out further control experiments together
- to answer all the missing gaps that could be recognized in the 94th session of the CA with Prof. Kämmerer and bring them up to our level of knowledge.
This offer is absolutely serious. Please get in touch with our contact person on Telegram @NotIsolate
- If anyone is in contact with Prof. Kämmerer, we ask them to inform them of our offer.
!! These days we are releasing our publication "Structural analysis of sequence data in virology", which shows that genome construction was not done right and that simple control experiments have shown that the claims of virologists are not sustainable."
Source:google translate-https://t.me/Corona_Fakten/850
0
No votes yet