Joe the Boomer invited be back to debate the learned pagan Tweetophon, who is a lawyer with proclivities for Aristotle and paganism. His position is, ironically, similar to Thomism and I am sure we will touch on all this. Enjoy!
Covering the ecumenical councils and the epistemic issue of how we have doctrinal certainty. I will touch on the importance of Pentecost and the teaching office of the Spirit and the means the Spirit had ordained. We will cover the approach of the councils from the councils themselves, beginning in Acts 15 up through the ecumenical ones, depending on how far we get. I will also reply to the laughable pseudo-argument about my using the term “infused substance” instead of infused accident, as if it altered the argument (which it doesn’t).
Classical Theist has agreed to come on to begin our debate on the issue of the essence-energy distinction and the uncreated energies of God, contrasted with the Thomistic and later Roman-defined doctrine of absolute simplicity.
The well-known debate over Theism between JF and myself from last year. We cover atheism, nihilism, logic and whether the positions are coherent.
Tonight at 8PM EST we will cover Fr. Rose’s classic book Nihilism. We will focus on the revolutionary age and how it brought man to a point of empty materialism, which led to nihilistic scientism. Now, we are in the era of post-human Luciferianism – another logical step. The first half is public, while the full talk for subscribers can be obtained at JaysAnalysis links below.
The boiler room gang gathers to debate the latest news.
