Interesting comment included asking if the 5 eyes, should really be knows as the 6 eyes?Included after the main article Readers here have surely noticed I use the "5 eyes media" label to describe what is almost entirely all of the main stream and alternative mediaI caught exactly, ZERO news stories originating from here in Canada on this meeting. Yet, Canada is assuredly fully represented at the meeting in New Zealand.
I guess the PKK Kurds and their US backers have no need to take Raqqa, then? Right?I think the need is gone. But you can bet the annex/appropriation of Syrian territory will continue unabated.
Kobani and Tabqa plus three equals 5 accessible bases- Equals permanent occupation by the US of annexed, by the Kurds, northern Syria.
Insidious: waiting to entrap: harmful but enticing - developing so gradually as to be well established before becoming apparentBackground for two upcoming posts. Though I expect most who visit here are aware of Hollywood's influence in everythingAre your beliefs and ideas really your own? I comfortable stating, mine are. How about you?The video below is very introductory but it gets the idea across Hollywood. Where the unreal is made real. An industry that exists to make money while shaping your real world beliefs.
According to 5 eyes media- Both sides, Yvet (Yes) and Hayir (No), are neck and neck. Is that accurate? Come on, it's 5 eyes media!This is same media that swore up and down that Hillary Clinton was going to win the US election. This is the same media that makes real out of the unreal, thinking specifically about the recent, alleged chemical attack in Syria.Here's an example of five eyes media perception management regarding Turkey's referendum.Via Canada's own CBC
This is alarming if even remotely true. Though it feels like fear mongering. Thoughts?Link
January 25/17: Trump to 'absolutely do safe zones'April 01/2017 US Access to 5, yes 5, Air Installations In Stolen Northern SyriaOk, honestly I can't stay away from this, though, I really, really want to. My back is killing me today! The US has been advancing unjustly, illegally and immorally in Syria.
Alleged chemical attack in Syria- I'm not digging into it at all. Syria, Turkey and Russia have ZERO interest in engaging in an attack like this, if it did occur at all!Who benefits and who does not from such an attack , real or staged, occurring at this time?1- From a PR perspective?
Following up on today's news out of St Petersburg, Russia..
