Strategy of tension

 I'd seen the news of this assassination earlier this week. 1-Article dated November 04/2018:Tensions in Raqqa Following Assassination of Tribal Sheikh 

Oddly enough I wrote a post similar to this March 01/ 2017:

• NATO Fracturing at Manbij? US Reinforces Manbij to Defend From Turkish Attack??

Yesterday:

 When Pompeo claims it would be “unfortunate” if Turkey leaves NATO, I’m curious as to what the context for the use of the word ‘unfortunate’ is? What or who could make this move unfortunate? 

The “again” was included in the headline, because this is neither the first, second or third time that Turkey has called on the US in this regard.PKK is always included so it cannot be ignored, because it should not be ignored, that the US is cavorting, again, with known terrorists. Turkey on Saturday called on the U.S. to terminate its engagement with the terrorist group PYD/YPG in Syria.

TASS

HTS fightersWhat is the Future of HTS in Idlib? From the Atlantic Council...

Getting back to that which I've neglected.

Short list of who wants the agreement to succeed:

• Syria
• Russia
• Iran
• Turkey

Short list of who wants the agreement to fail:

• US
• Israel
• PKK
• France

US Backed Terrorists Behind Idlib Attack

I’m more of the mind that Turkey and Syria have been holding clandestine meetings  for some time now- Pretty sure there are reports to that affect here. Even if they haven’t met in a face to face format- Turkey and Syria have communicated via Russia.  Possibly via Iran.

Finally.. that which has been reported on for years  here at the blog is being admitted via TWITTER- which means the gullible masses are being prepped for the next big move-I'm including flashbacks to when much of what's being reported openly today was covered here. 1-Buzzfeed: