The Kevin Barrett – Noam Chomsky Dispute in Historical Perspective – Eleventh part of the series titled “9/11 and the Zionist Question” – Read the tenth part here By Prof. Tony Hall | American Herald Tribune | August 12, 2016 Jonathan Kay began his literary career in 1998 as a founding member of the editorial […]
Uprooted Palestinians | July 23, 2015 Gay hanging in Iran: Atrocities and impersonations By Scot Long I Everybody on earth knows that last week a deal on Iran’s nuclear program was announced. Everybody also knows that this apparent step toward peace launched a new stage in an old war: of propaganda. Proponents praise the possibility of […]
One of the more startling aspects of Andrew Weaver’s libel case was Weaver’s claim that it was defamatory in Canada to say, even in an opinion column, that Weaver had called for Pachauri’s resignation or even a change in leadership at IPCC. It was even more startling that novice judge Emily Burke found in Weaver’s favour on this point. Given the controversies surrounding Pachauri in 2010, one might ask of Weaver: if you didn’t call for Pachauri’s resignation, why didn’t you?
Andrew Weaver has been taking a victory lap following the recent decision in his favor by rookie judge Emily Burke. In previous commentary about Mann v Steyn, I’ve made some snide remarks about the competence of D.C. trial court judge Combs-Greene, either implying or stating that Canadian courts have higher standards. I take it all back. As a Canadian, it’s embarrassing to discuss Judge Burke’s disorganized and muddled decision with readers from other countries.
On a special October 16, 2014 episode of Exposing Faux Capitalism, I interviewed Arthur Topham, who has been charged as a political thought criminal for allegedly violating Canada’s Criminal Code provisions for “willfully promoting hatred,” for his writings at his site, RadicalPress.com. In this interview, the issues we discussed included: - The Ontario Civil Liberties […]
By Brandon Martinez | Press TV | June 19, 2014 The Canadian media is awash with hysteria about what it calls a potential Iranian-sponsored terror attack in Ottawa. Unsurprisingly, the hype is rooted in baseless innuendo typical of neocon warmongers who act as loudspeakers for the Zionist regime in Tel Aviv. The neoconservative National Post, […]
By Brandon Martinez | Press TV | June 19, 2014 The Canadian media is awash with hysteria about what it calls a potential Iranian-sponsored terror attack in Ottawa. Unsurprisingly, the hype is rooted in baseless innuendo typical of neocon warmongers who act as loudspeakers for the Zionist regime in Tel Aviv. The neoconservative National Post, […]
