Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

Greenpeace isn't anti-establishment anymore. Now it's just another arm of the authoritarian, UN green machine.

In Berlin this week, environmental activists were allowed to attend a four-day meeting that journalists were denied access to. This is normal IPCC procedure.

I’ll be in Germany and Scotland this month, giving speeches about the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. This Thursday, I’ll be addressing the International Conference on Climate and Energy, which is being held in Mannheim, Germany (info here). Also on the program: meteorologist Richard Lindzen, geologist Sebastian Lüning, astrophysicist Nir Shaviv, and solar physicist Henrik […]

By Roy W. Spencer, Ph. D. | Watts Up With That? | October 24, 2009

Facts that don’t agree with claims

By Anthony Watts | Watts Up With That? | April 1, 2014

This sentence…

“One of the panel’s most striking new conclusions is that rising temperatures are already depressing crop yields, including those of corn and wheat.”

Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, the marine biologist who led the IPCC's Ocean chapter, is a full-blown environmental activist. He recently wrote a politicized foreword to a WWF brochure, and has a long history of employment with both the WWF and Greenpeace.

In one chapter alone, IPCC personnel relied on unpublished studies 21 times to make their case.

An IPCC document produced for its meeting in Yokohama uses emphatically activist language. What happened to the scientific body delivering a scientific report based on scientific research?

Manipulation of a Summary document makes the UN's climate panel look like an overly-protective, hysterical mother.

How does the new climate report compare to the last one? Has the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change pulled up its socks?