IPCC Links New Report to Sneering Stephen Schneider
An organization whose reputation is in tatters links its new document to a rude, intolerant, highly politicized climate crusader.
An organization whose reputation is in tatters links its new document to a rude, intolerant, highly politicized climate crusader.
Why did a scientific organization issue a statement about the Scottish independence vote?
Rather than persuading us with reason and logic, the World Meteorological Organization is making stuff up.
Asking a random group of climate scientists to comment on policy measures (as opposed to scientific questions) leads to some disturbing answers.
Credentialed, experienced critics declare that the UN's climate panel is politicized - and that many of its conclusions are mistaken.
Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, the marine biologist who led the IPCC's Ocean chapter, is a full-blown environmental activist. He recently wrote a politicized foreword to a WWF brochure, and has a long history of employment with both the WWF and Greenpeace.
An IPCC document produced for its meeting in Yokohama uses emphatically activist language. What happened to the scientific body delivering a scientific report based on scientific research?
The IPCC's Chapter 7 was not written by neutral, dispassionate scholars. Three UN employees are among its authors.
A fake Nobel keynote speaker played an embarrassingly minor role in the IPCC.
A press release issued this week falsely describes economist Woodrow Clark as a Nobel Peace Prize winner.