Those who have been reading this blog for a while know that I absolutely cannot stand the bullshit of "political correctness' and especially the machinations of the so called "LBGTQEIEIO" community of retards and misfits.... I have also been attacking the stupidity of "transgenderism" and how that fraud has been ripping our societies apart with the ignorance of not even trying to understand that there are ONLY TWO GENDERS as nature has rightfully created for proper procreation of our species, and all this foolishness and talk of there being as many as 50 (!) genders is pure retardation and promoted by some of the stupidest people on planet Earth! Well, once again I do want to take a swipe at the stupidity of transgenderism" and how some of those out there are so supremely fucked up in not even knowing whether they are male or female.... For according to the following report from the Federalist online news service, at www.thefederalist.com, apparently a father of a 14 year old daughter in British Columbia Canada has just been found 'guilty" of the crime of calling his "transgender" daughter a girl! And on top of that the charge laid on that innocent man is "family violence" for correctly stating that his daughter is indeed female, called her a "she" and not something else (!). I do in fact have that article right here for all to see for themselves, and I have my own thoughts and comments to follow:
Father Gagged, Found Guilty Of ‘Family Violence’ For Calling His Trans Daughter A ‘She’
British Columbia's Supreme Court declared a father guilty of 'family violence' for giving interviews to publications including The Federalist in which he used female pronouns for his daughter.Last week, Justice Francesca Marzari of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Canada, declared a father guilty of “family violence” against his 14-year-old daughter on the sole basis that he had engaged in “expressions of rejection of [her] gender identity.” These “expressions” revolved entirely around his polite refusal to refer to his daughter as a boy in private, and his steady choice to affirm that she is a girl in public.As previously reported, the BC Supreme Court ordered in February that 14-year-old Maxine* receive testosterone injections without parental consent. Accordingly,Maxine began regular injections at British Columbia (BC) Children’s Hospital over the course of the last two months.Her father, Clark*, strongly objects to this treatment and immediately sought to reverse the decision in the BC Court of Appeal. Hoping to raise awareness of his case, Clark gave a number of interviews to media outlets, including The Federalist. In these interviews, he repeatedly referred to his daughter as a girl, stating to The Federalist that “she is a girl. Her DNA will not change through all these experiments that they do.”While many might take this to be an honest statement of biological fact, Marzari quoted it as a prime example of Clark’s “family violence of a public denial of [Maxine’s] gender identity.” Marzari convicted Clark of this violence, and issued a “protection order” preventing him from speaking to journalists or the public about his case.While the main thrust of Marzari’s ruling focused on Clark’s public statements, Marzari also ordered that Clark be enjoined from “exposing” Maxine to any materials that might “question whether [her] gender identity is real or the treatments [she] seeks are in [her] best interests.” This order arose from the fact that, in mid-March, Clark invited his daughter to watch a video of a small-time Canadian conservative commentator with him.The video contained a section discussing Maxine’s case, which she quickly recognized. She told her father she “did not want to watch the video, and went to [her] room.” This incident, according to Marzari, was a clear case of an “attempt to persuade [Maxine] to abandon treatment,” and, hence, of family violence.
Family Violence via Talking in Public?
What Marzari found particularly egregious, however, was not Clark’s private interactions with his daughter but his “continued willingness to provide interviews to the media … in which he identifies [Maxine] as female, uses a female name for [Maxine] … and expresses his opposition to the therapies [Maxine] has chosen.” According to the court, this willingness placed Maxine at “a significant risk of harm.”This harm was not so much feared because Maxine’s anonymity might be breached (it is worth noting that Maxine previously sought to have the press publish her real name), but because Clark’s “family violence of a public denial of [Maxine’s] gender identity” was regarded as likely to cause Maxine distress. Marzari argued that such a denial about such a “deeply private aspect of [Maxine’s] innermost thoughts and feelings” was likely to lead to a variety of dangers, “including self-harm.”Marzari argued that the “people and organizations” to whom Clark granted interviews had shown themselves “fundamentally opposed” to transgender ideology, yet Clark “continued to support the media organizations posting his commentary with additional interviews.” This kind of attitude was, in Marzari’s view, justification for enjoining Clark from sharing any information with journalists—or with practically anyone outside his legal team—about his daughter’s “sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, mental or physical health, medical status or therapies.”The court also emphasized that Clark must not allow relevant documents (petitions, affidavits, letters, court orders, etc.) to come into the hands of third parties not “authorized by order of this court,” or with “written consent” from his daughter.While forbidding Clark to speak to the public about his daughter’s case, Marzari stated that she was not overriding Clark’s “freedom of thought and speech.” “There is no requirement that [Clark] change his views about what is best for [Maxine],” she explained. “It is only how he expresses those views privately to [Maxine] and publically to third parties that is affected.”The fact that Clark is now not allowed to express his views publicly to anyone at all was, apparently, understood to be a fairly imposed consequence for his previous court-objected behavior. Had he strictly abstained from referring to his daughter “as a girl or with female pronouns,” he might not have been guilty of family violence and so subject to this order.While the judge’s view of matters enjoys support on the political left, some feel the ruling is biased and politically motivated. Kari Simpson, president of Canadian pro-family organization Culture Guard, argued that Marzari’s decision severely limits Clark’s freedom of speech. Citing Marzari’s significant and recent history of LGBT and pro-abortion activism before her 2017 appointment to the BC Supreme Court, Simpson argued that she was operating as an “activist judge” more interested in delivering a ruling convenient to her cause than enforcing laws designed to protect families and children.Unfortunately, the gag order on Clark makes it difficult to report his reaction to this new development in his case. In the meantime, his appeal of the court’s original ruling regarding testosterone injections is set to be heard on May 14.*Clark and Maxine are not the real names of the father and daughter involved. Their identities have been concealed by court order. Court documents use the initials CD and AB, respectively, and media refers to Maxine as simply “Max.”Jeremiah Keenan is a pro-life activist and freelance writer. He recently graduated from the University of Pennsylvania, where he argued with leftists and wrote for The Daily Pennsylvanian. He also earned a bachelors in mathematics and assisted the sociology department researching religious opinion trends on eugenics, race, birth control, and homosexuality. Jeremiah grew up in China and lives, at the moment, in Ohio. He can be contacted at JeremiahJKeenan@gmail.com.NTS Notes: Honestly... This is truly one fucked up country we have here called Canada, where a father that helped raise his own daughter is now found "guilty" in a retarded Canadian "court of law" of "family violence" for simply stating exactly what his daughter's gender is! I do wonder what will happen now that this precedence has been set in that stupid British Columbia courtroom? Will we now have all the stupid and brainwashed children out there put their parents in the dock in a courtroom for calling them "he" or "she" and not something else? Retardation indeed....Yes, readers, we are now witnessing the downfall of our societies, where thanks to the fraud of "transgenderism" our children and even adults are truly fucked up and everyone is fearful now of calling them either "male" or "female" out of fear of being charged with a crime! This is beyond stupidity and people out there must take a stand, and quickly, before this problem festers into an unstoppable avalanche of lunacy!I must inform readers that I too have been under attack over these last few months for my stand on this stupidity, and even "Google" has now been sending me "warnings" that unless I curtail my stand and adhere to "political correctness", I could be banned.... I am a truth seeker and will never change my stand, for I see the reality of all this bullshit as nothing more than weapons being used to collapse our societies.... Hopefully others see the same thing and will not bow down to such stupidity...Women are women, and men are men.... He is he and she is she.... There are only two sexes in terms of homo sapiens aka mankind, and therefore I will never bow to idiots out there that state otherwise...More to comeNTS