I did indeed catch some of the Jew spew media reports from yesterday about all those controversial "women's marches" that were staged right across North America... Many of these so called "marches" were supposed to be protests against incoming President Drumpf and his supposed and very fraudulent "hates women" agenda that does not exist.... I and others have carefully noted all of the incoming President's policies and statements, and I found NOTHING at all in his actions or statements that should have the ire of women across America... Therefore there has to be something else to the agenda and someone else wanting these women to "protest" across North America...Well, lo and behold, but the truth is finally out in the open...For according to the following article from the New York Times website, at nytlive.nytimes.com, apparently none other than the most evil creature on planet Earth (next to that insane slime ball Benyamin Miliekowski aka "Netanyahu") Dr Evil himself, George Soros, is the one that financed the groups that fomented these marches! First here is that article right here for everyone to look over for themselves, and I do have my own thoughts and comments to follow:Billionaire George Soros has ties to more than 50 ‘partners’ of the Women’s March on WashingtonWhat is the link between one of Hillary Clinton’s largest donors and the Women’s March? Turns out, it’s quite significantASRA Q. NOMANI01.20.17BILLIONAIRE INVESTOR GEORGE SOROS. (PHOTO BY SEAN GALLUP/GETTY IMAGES)In the pre-dawn darkness of today’s presidential inauguration day, I faced a choice, as a lifelong liberal feminist who voted for Donald Trump for president: lace up my pink Nike sneakers to step forward and take the DC Metro into the nation’s capital for the inauguration of America’s new president, or wait and go tomorrow to the after-party, dubbed the “Women’s March on Washington”? The Guardian has touted the “Women’s March on Washington” as a “spontaneous” action for women’s rights. Another liberal media outlet, Vox, talks about the “huge, spontaneous groundswell” behind the march. On its website, organizers of the march are promoting their work as “a grassroots effort” with “independent” organizers. Even my local yoga studio, Beloved Yoga, is renting a bus and offering seats for $35. The march’s manifesto says magnificently, “The Rise of the Woman = The Rise of the Nation.”It’s an idea that I, a liberal feminist, would embrace. But I know — and most of America knows — that the organizers of the march haven’t put into their manifesto: the march really isn’t a “women’s march.” It’s a march for women who are anti-Trump. As someone who voted for Trump, I don’t feel welcome, nor do many other women who reject the liberal identity-politics that is the core underpinnings of the march, so far, making white women feel unwelcome, nixing women who oppose abortion and hijacking the agenda. To understand the march better, I stayed up through the nights this week, studying the funding, politics and talking points of the some 403 groups that are “partners” of the march. Is this a non-partisan “Women’s March”?Roy Speckhardt, executive director of the American Humanist Association, a march “partner,” told me his organization was “nonpartisan” but has “many concerns about the incoming Trump administration that include what we see as a misogynist approach to women.” Nick Fish, national program director of the American Atheists, another march partner, told me, “This is not a ‘partisan’ event.” Dennis Wiley, pastor of Covenant Baptist United Church of Christ, another march “partner,” returned my call and said, “This is not a partisan march.”Really? UnitedWomen.org, another partner, features videos with the hashtags #ImWithHer, #DemsInPhily and #ThanksObama. Following the money, I poured through documents of billionaire George Soros and his Open Society philanthropy, because I wondered: What is the link between one of Hillary Clinton’s largest donors and the “Women’s March”? I found out: plenty.By my draft research, which I’m opening up for crowd-sourcing on GoogleDocs, Soros has funded, or has close relationships with, at least 56 of the march’s “partners,” including “key partners” Planned Parenthood, which opposes Trump’s anti-abortion policy, and the National Resource Defense Council, which opposes Trump’s environmental policies. The other Soros ties with “Women’s March” organizations include the partisan MoveOn.org (which was fiercely pro-Clinton), the National Action Network (which has a former executive director lauded by Obama senior advisor Valerie Jarrett as “a leader of tomorrow” as a march co-chair and another official as “the head of logistics”). Other Soros grantees who are “partners” in the march are the American Civil Liberties Union, Center for Constitutional Rights, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. March organizers and the organizations identified here haven’t yet returned queries for comment. On the issues I care about as a Muslim, the “Women’s March,” unfortunately, has taken a stand on the side of partisan politics that has obfuscated the issues of Islamic extremism over the eight years of the Obama administration. “Women’s March” partners include the Council on American-Islamic Relations, which has not only deflected on issues of Islamic extremism post-9/11, but opposes Muslim reforms that would allow women to be prayer leaders and pray in the front of mosques, without wearing headscarves as symbols of chastity. Partners also include the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), which wrongly designated Maajid Nawaz, a Muslim reformer, an “anti-Muslim extremist” in a biased report released before the election. The SPLC confirmed to me that Soros funded its “anti-Muslim extremists” report targeting Nawaz. (Ironically, CAIR also opposes abortions, but its leader still has a key speaking role.)Another Soros grantee and march “partner” is the Arab-American Association of New York, whose executive director, Linda Sarsour, is a march co-chair. When I co-wrote a piece, arguing that Muslim women don’t have to wear headscarves as a symbol of “modesty,” she attacked the coauthor and me as “fringe.” Earlier, at least 33 of the 100 “women of color,” who initially protested the Trump election in street protests, worked at organizations that receive Soros funding, in part for “black-brown” activism. Of course, Soros is an “ideological philanthropist,” whose interests align with many of these groups, but he is also a significant political donor. In Davos, he told reporters that Trump is a “would-be dictator.”A spokeswoman for Soros’s Open Society Foundations, said in a statement, “There have been many false reports about George Soros and the Open Society Foundations funding protests in the wake of the U.S. presidential elections. There is no truth to these reports.” She added, “We support a wide range of organizations — including those that support women and minorities who have historically been denied equal rights. Many of whom are concerned about what policy changes may lie ahead. We are proud of their work. We of course support the right of all Americans to peaceably assemble and petition their government—a vital, and constitutionally safeguarded, pillar of a functioning democracy.”Much like post-election protests, which included a sign, “Kill Trump,” were not “spontaneous,” as reported by some media outlets, the “Women’s March” is an extension of strategic identity politics that has so fractured America today, from campuses to communities. On the left or the right, it’s wrong. But, with the inauguration, we know the politics. With the march, “women” have been appropriated for a clearly anti-Trump day. When I shared my thoughts with her, my yoga studio owner said it was “sad” the march’s organizers masked their politics. “I want love for everyone,” she said. The left’s fierce identity politics and its failure on Islamic extremism lost my vote this past election, and so, as the dawn’s first light breaks through the darkness of the morning as I write, I make my decision: I’ll lace up my pink Nikes and head to the inauguration, skipping the “Women’s March” that doesn’t have a place for women like me.EDITOR’S NOTE: This story has been updated to include a statement from the Open Society Foundations.Asra Q. Nomani is a former Wall Street Journal reporter. She can be reached at asra@asranomani.com or on Twitter.NTS Notes: WHY am I not surprised or shocked that this evil and most wicked man is the one that financed these protests?? That alone should say to everyone that these "protests" were indeed a fraud, and that these "marches" were conducted to try to whip up propaganda against incoming President Drumpf... Luckily, most of these fraud "protests" fizzled out and they were indeed unsuccessful..Look, lets get the facts straight here... Donald Drumpf is NO saint, and his past is indeed controversial... He has had many women in his life and there is a distinct possibility that his dealings with some women has not been saintly.... But what would anyone expect? Perfection? EVERY President throughout history has carried some baggage into the White House, but now thanks to the digital age, every single wrong doing from anyone's past all they way to their childhood can be brought out in the open and thrown in that person's face.... We saw that happen during the horrid American political circus of a campaign for the Presidency and we all know that the Jew spew media would desperately try to find anything they can to fling at Drumpf.... Therefore again, what else is new?Lets also face the facts here... This evil and sick bastard, George Soros, has already said that he would do everything necessary to try to get Donald Drumpf out of the Oval Office... He has also already financed so many protests and riots across America before under the Soetoro administration and luckily those too have fizzled....I am truly hoping that most women that read this blog understand exactly what has been going on here, and what the REAL purpose of those "protests" was all about.... And that they should not fall for this type of pure propaganda and attempted brainwashing ever again!More to comeNTS
Source