Topic: Genetics

Language
Undefined

0
No votes yet

Genetics
 
"The case of Lukis Anderson as a video summary and which highly explosive study was used by the lawyer."
 
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fL4fM_sG414
 

Genetics 
 
https://t.me/NeueMedizinBibliothek/280
Telegram translate:
 
"How do “DNA” traces spread?
 
The study authors Oorschot & Goray investigated this question. 
 
https://www.floridaforensicscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/The-Complexities-of-DNA-Transfer-During-a-Social-Setting.pdf
 
In a videotaped laboratory experiment, 3 volunteers sat at a table and shared a jug of juice for 20 minutes. After chatting and drinking, swabs were taken from their hands, table, jug and juice glasses, among other things, and examined for genetic material. A total of 5 experimental runs were carried out.
 
Results:
 
3.2.3 Table:

• In 23.3% of the table samples, DNA profiles were found that could not be assigned to the experiment participants.

• 3.2.4 GlassesIn one case, no DNA could be detected on the glass used, even though the participant had his hand on the glass for the longest time during the experiment. In addition, no DNA could be found on his hand. In return, his DNA could not be excluded in a composite sample from another participant.

• Of the existing one-person samples, only 26.7% pointed to their own glass owner.

• Of all the mixed samples of two available, 44.4% had a participant's DNA, even though he had not touched it.

 
3.2.6 Jug handle

• In Experiment 1, a DNA mixture from 6 people was found with, among other things, a remarkable unknown profile. Because this unknown profile was not only evident on the jug handle, but also in the test sample of the chair and the control sample!

 
3.2.7 Hand

• An unknown profile was noticed in the hand swabs and a glass sample. What is remarkable is that that hand never touched this glass. (For this to happen, a third party's sample would have to have migrated from the hand over the jug handle to the glass, although the traces did not stop on the jug itself.)

• No DNA profiles could be determined from 4 swabs taken directly from the hand (16.6%).

• A hand swab revealed a 12-person mixed sample, which, however, could not be interpreted due to its complexity.

 
3.2.8 Analysis of transmission routes

• The jug corpus was touched by participant 2, but not by participant 1. Interestingly, however, participant 1's profile was recognized.

1. Valid results look different. Or you could say that the assumptions of genetics have once again been turned on their head."

 
t.me/NewMedicineLibrary