Stem cells - embarrassing misconceptions and manipulations are not addressed

Language
Undefined

0
No votes yet

Stem cells - embarrassing misconceptions and manipulations are not addressed
By Corona_Fakten auf Telegram • 11 October 2022
deepL translate : https://t.me/Corona_Fakten/
  
Stem cells - embarrassing misconceptions and manipulations are not addressed❗️
The topic of stem cells is the third most discussed topic. 
The awarding of the 2012 Nobel Prize for Medicine to stem cell researchers meant that embarrassing misconceptions and manipulations are not addressed through dogmatisation, so that this rapidly growing market is not endangered. 
Also the myth about the allegedly cloned sheep Dolly turned out in reality to be quite normal through in vitro fertilised breeding, thus Dolly's fate was sealed.
 
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
 
A contribution by Dr. Stefan Lanka
 
Stem cells - embarrassing misconceptions and manipulations are not addressed
 
 
deepL Translate:
 
https://telegra.ph/Stammzellen---peinliche-Fehlannahmen-und-Manipulationen-werden-nicht-thematisiert-10-11
 
The topic of stem cells is the third most discussed topic. The awarding of the Nobel Prize for Medicine of 2012 to stem cell researchers caused embarrassing misconceptions and manipulations not to be addressed through dogmatisation, so that this fast-growing market is not endangered. 
 
The misconceptions are: 
 
1. The cell nucleus contains the genetic information that could rejuvenate adult cells by reprogramming them. 
2. Genetically rejuvenated cells would again be able to develop into all kinds of cell types, just like a fertilised egg cell.
3. The actual stem cells, which are found everywhere in the body, are passed off as the supporting cells of the body and brain. It is claimed that stem cells were created from them. 
 
 
 
Regarding Point 1
 
1. The cell nucleus contains the genetic information that could rejuvenate adult cells by reprogramming them. 
 
When the electron microscope became available after 1945, none of the claimed disease-causing viruses could be photographed, isolated, photographed again and biochemically characterised. Therefore, the infection hypotheses were publicly admitted to be false and vaccination was discontinued. From 1952 onwards, massive propaganda by industry and the state spread the idea that disease-causing viruses could not be seen because they usually multiplied very slowly.
 
During the time when viruses are not visible, the information for their blueprint and disease toxin (Latin: virus) would be in the form of genetic information, which would be hidden in the cell nucleus. This became the idea of cancer genes, later the idea of genes for everything and the basis of the patentability of the food market. The fact that DNA can have nothing to do with heredity, since it changes constantly and massively in every cell, is kept from the public. 
 
With the then unproven and now disproven assertion by Watson and Crick that the structure of DNA is like a spiral staircase, the assertion that DNA is hereditary matter became state-taught dogma. It follows from the dogma that the hereditary substance of the egg cell would simultaneously carry the programme of transformation into different DNA of the 200 adult cell types of a human being. Adult, differentiated cells would therefore no longer be able to transform back into stem cells, which can still do everything.
 
The starting point of all claims about stem cells was and is wrong because they assume a genetic development programme that does not exist in reality. However, the dream of immortality was so great that it was claimed that through a genetic technology to be developed, the reprogramming of adult cells, thus rejuvenation and immortality would be possible. 
 
The first man who claimed twenty years ago to make humans immortal through cloning became filthy rich overnight (US$200 million), disappeared with the money of patrons, investors, shareholders and left us with a quote: "Cloning is the first serious step to becoming one with God."
 
 
 
Regarding Point 2
 
2. Genetically rejuvenated cells would again be able to develop into all kinds of cell types, just like a fertilised egg cell.
 
The elder of the two Nobel laureates for stem cell research, Prof. John B. Gurdon conducted experiments in which he nucleated fertilised eggs from frogs, from which it is quite easy to breed new frogs, and placed the cell nucleus into a cell of an adult frog. As this developed into a frog, he claimed that this was done by the power of the adult frog's DNA. This cell would have rejuvenated itself through the act of inserting itself into the enucleated egg cell.
 
What he and all other stem cell researchers fail to mention is that it is quite normal that fertilised and enucleated eggs ALWAYS develop into the same frogs, even if you put the cell nuclei of completely different frog species into the enucleated eggs. It is not the DNA that makes the metabolism, but the metabolism that makes the DNA. This has been unambiguously proven since 1953 by the experiments of Miller and Urey and has not been refuted to this day.
 
Under the same genetic dogma that the identity of an organism is determined by the DNA of the cell nucleus, it was later claimed that, as with frogs, it was possible to rejuvenate and clone mammals in the same way. When prominent US scientists became publicly outraged at claims by British stem cell researchers that Dolly the sheep was a clone and spilled the secret that Dolly was in fact bred normally by in vitro fertilisation, Dolly's fate was sealed.
 
Without saving cells and DNA material from Dolly, with which purely hypothetical investigations into its identity to the mother animal could and should have been carried out - especially if DNA is claimed to be a hereditary substance and its immutability - Dolly was immediately killed, stuffed and put in the museum. When Dolly's father, Prof. Keith Campbell, heard that he would be left empty-handed at the Nobel Prize for stem cells, although he was awarded the Shaw Prize, the "Nobel Prize of the East" for stem cells still together with Prof. Yamanaka, he passed away.
 
 
 
Regarding Point 3
 
3. The actual stem cells, which are found everywhere in the body, are passed off as the supporting cells of the body and brain. It is claimed that stem cells were created from them. 
 
The younger of the two Nobel laureates, the Japanese Prof. Shinya Yamanaka, came up with a new idea after the scandals surrounding Dolly and the Korean stem cell researcher who made up all the data for his claims that he could clone mammals and soon also humans:
 
He used stem cells, called them adult, differentiated cells, which he would have induced by a firework of genetic manipulations to change back into stem cells, in order to produce nerve cells, intestinal cells and connective tissue cells from them with another firework of genetic tricks. He called the cells created by this patented technique, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS). 
 
That the claimed adult connective tissue cells are stem cells has been known in "official" science for 10 years. These cells, called fibroblasts and in the brain glial cells, build up the entire basic substance in which all cells of the body are embedded. Anyone familiar with Pischinger's and Prof. Heine's research on basic substance has known this for over 20 years. So it is no wonder that clever imitators of Yamanaka soon published that they do not need genetic engineering at all to turn these cells into stem cells.
 
The intention of the Nobel Prize Committee to conceal the contradictions of stem cell research is proven: It conceals the fact that there has been published evidence since 2002 showing that nerves form directly from "connective tissue cells" without the need to first rejuvenate and form embryonic stem cells. All those involved, the Nobel Prize Committee and the journalists, who are obliged by law to report truthfully, are to be reproached for concealing these known facts.
 
The Nobel Committee's publicity for the stem cell industry distracts from the fact that we are ageing by being
 
1. important substances are missing in the diet, 
 
2. our veins and basic substance become increasingly impermeable due to deficiency and poisoning, 
 
3. it is medicine that is poisoning us and all life more and more through antibiotics, chemotherapy and genetic engineering, and 
 
4. due to more and more traumas in our society, the building up and breaking down of cells in the body is happening more and more frequently and violently or is not coming to rest, which leads to internal scarring in the organs and brain, energy and metabolic blockages.
STEM  CELLS SAVE THE CANCER INDUSTRY
The cancer industry also desperately needs stem cell claims to offset the refutation of metastasis claims. Metastasis claims have been the number one selling point for chemotherapy, other aggressive cancer treatments, and have generated the largest medical market, the aftermarket for these treatment consequences.
 
It was the results of so-called genetic engineering that refuted the previous metastasis hypotheses within the cancer scene. They showed that all cells involved in the build-up and degradation processes in the body, which are passed off as metastases, always look biochemically like the cells of the organs in which these processes are detected. According to the previous cancer hypotheses, however, the metastases would have had to match the so-called primary tumour, from which they would have detached, gone on a journey and, for example, triggered a second colon cancer in the brain. 
In order to maintain the claims about metastases and thus the alleged dangerousness of cancer, it has recently been claimed that metastases are actually mutated stem cells that would cause the respective typical cancer in the respective organs. For this purpose, the cancer stem cells would migrate all over the body, transforming themselves into the respective tissue in order to produce the respective cancer. That is why it is not possible to recognise where the cancer comes from. Because metastases are in fact mutated stem cells, they would always look like the environment in which increased growth or degradation occurs. So the metastasis and primary tumour hypotheses could be abandoned and replaced by the idea of cancer stem cells. The cancer industry and stakeholders therefore need the stem cell claims to maintain the largest medical market built by the metastasis claim.