Chicago billionaire realtor and casino magnate Neil Bluhm owns the two best hotels in Chicago, the Four Seasons and the Ritz Carlton. But he's probably best known, outside of billionaire real estate circles, for having thrown a 49th birthday party for Obama where the minimum price for admission was $30,000 (checks made out to the DNC). He's shoveled immense amounts of money into the political careers of neo-liberals and crooked pols like Rahm Emanuel, Hillary Clinton, Rod Blagojevich, the Madigans, Melissa Bean, etc. He writes big checks too. In 2016, he gave the DSCC $66,600 in July and then Schumer's Senate Majority PAC a million dollar check in August-- and another $350,000 in October. On Halloween of that same year, he gave the DNC $100,000. He's written 25 separate checks for $20,000 or more to federal Democratic committees and he's made maximum contributions to conservative neo-liberal Democrats like Biden, Frackenlooper, Hillary, Schumer, Brad Schneider, Kirsten Gillibrand, Tammy Duckworth, Ben Nelson, Michelle Nunn, Joe Lieberman, Robert Menendez, Max Baucus, Mary Landrieu, Tim Mahoney, etc. He's made 277 federal campaign contributions.On Thursday, Biden was in Chicago, collecting big checks from the super-rich... at three separate events. The first one was hosted by Bluhm.
At the first fundraiser, Biden stopped by a luncheon at Bluhm’s sprawling downtown residence near the Mag Mile. Biden was introduced by Bluhm, who told his high-profile guests that both presidential candidates Elizabeth Warren and Sanders “don’t represent the Democratic Party” that Bluhm supports. Bluhm said Biden “has the best chance of defeating Trump.”That prompted a response from Sanders’ campaign: “Mr Bluhm is right-- the Democratic Party I represent is the party of the working class, not billionaires. That’s why we’re going to win,” the Sanders campaign said in a statement to CNN.Sanders statement hit as Biden-- considered the most centrist of the Democratic frontrunners-- visited the homes of wealthy donors in Chicago. And it came as Sanders-- vying with Warren for the party’s more progressive wing-- announced his campaign had received donations from more than one million individual donors.
Asked about the Bluhm comments about him-- at an MSNBC Climate Crisis event Biden skipped so he could suck up to the billionaires and multimillionaires-- Bernie responded, "I would say to him, 'Joe, we are not going to make the changes we need in this country when you go to three fundraisers in Chicago sponsored by multi-millionaires.' We are going to make the changes that we need in this country when the working people of America stand up to the corporate elite, not [back candidates who] take their money."And it isn't only greedy, selfish billionaires like Bluhm trying to stop Bernie. As Krystal Ball pointed out in the video up top, Republicans and ex-Republicans who hate Trump are also pushing hard for Republican-lite Status Quo Joe. She focused primarily on the MSNBC Republicans. But last January Caitlin Johnstone was all over crooked ex-GOP hitman David Brock. She pointed out an NBC Op-Ed by the Clinton crony, Bernie Sanders’ fans can’t be allowed to poison another Democratic primary with personal attacks-- Bashing Beto O’Rourke (and every other Democrat) doesn’t help liberals’ cause in 2020. It only helps Trump. "The article," wrote Johnstone, "explicitly blames Hillary Clinton’s loss to Donald Trump on supporters of Bernie Sanders who criticized her during the primary, and makes it clear that such criticisms must be forcefully and aggressively fought against this time around.
“I’m hardly the only political observer who blames Hillary Clinton’s general election defeat to Donald Trump in part on personal attacks on Clinton first made by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and his backers,” Brock’s article begins. “Those attacks from her left laid the groundwork for copycat attacks lobbed by Donald Trump-- and, in the process, helped hand the Supreme Court to the right-wing for a generation.”Citing no evidence, Brock goes on to accuse journalists and social media users of staging a “coordinated effort” to “attack” Beto O’Rourke and other presidential hopefuls, as though coordination would be necessary for criticisms and questions to emerge about the voting records and campaign donations of public officials seeking the highest political office on the planet. The implication, of course, is that no criticisms of any kind should be leveled at Democratic presidential primary contestants, leaving narrative-shaping authority solely in the hands of the plutocratic media and beltway manipulators like David Brock.Brock concludes his screed as follows:In 2016, I ran a pro-Hillary SuperPAC which attempted to defend the candidate against false attacks, many of which came from or originated to her left. Though they were hardly in charge of our messaging, it was made very clear to us by our allies at her campaign headquarters that any efforts on our part to push back against the left-wing anti-Clinton brigades were unwelcome assistance; they feared alienating Sanders’ voters.That head-in-the-sand posture was ultimately self-defeating.Today, Democrats are rightly laser-focused on picking a winner in 2020, and the stakes are just too high to let bad faith actors-- whose real aim is to smear Democrats as no different than Republicans-- stage inter-party schisms. If Sanders decides to run again this time, he should focus on policy and eschew character attacks on Democrats-- and admonish his supporters to do the same. Otherwise, they put the core values we all share at risk, yet again.It is unclear what “character attacks” Brock is claiming Sanders made; the entirety of criticisms leveled by Sanders and the overwhelming majority of his supporters were directed at the policy decisions Clinton made in her political career and the shady places she took money from. What is clear is that the pro-Hillary SuperPAC he is referring to was the infamous “Correct the Record” troll operation, which employed literal shills to deceitfully pose as grassroots Hillary supporters online whose job was to attack anyone who criticized her. This despicable tactic was incalculably disruptive to online political discourse in 2016, and Brock clearly wants to implement a far more aggressive version of his operation in the 2020 primaries.“Let’s be clear about what’s going on here: this is a deliberate Dem Party effort to try to intimidate journalists and advocacy groups into not reporting on voting records and campaign donations,” tweeted progressive investigative journalist David Sirota in response to Brock’s article, adding, “Wanna know why I rejected working for this guy? That’s why.” Sirota had agreed to work with Brock on a new outlet billed as “The left’s answer to Breitbart” in early 2017, but later backed out of the project. Brock’s liberal Breitbart never materialized.If you want a quality illustration of what a manipulative sociopath David Brock is, contrast his obnoxious, dishonest accusatory screed with his open letter to Sanders at the beginning of 2017 titled “Dear Senator Sanders: I’m with You in the Fight Ahead”. Brock apologized for his harsh attacks on Sanders, gushed about the way Bernie “electrified millions” with his campaign and pledged to work with him to harness that energy against Trump. Brock wanted something from Sanders (control of his base in this case), so he smothered him in flattery; now people are criticizing Beto “Like Obama, only white” O’Rourke, and all of a sudden Sanders is back to being a red commie menace whose “character attacks” are to blame for Hillary Clinton’s loss. Brock has no relationship with truth beyond his ability to twist it to get things he wants.Hillary Clinton is to blame for Hillary Clinton’s loss, actually, as well as the strategists like David Brock who were behind her spectacular failure to defeat a historically unpopular reality TV star Republican. Establishment Democrats are trying to sell the narrative that “You progressives disobeyed us in 2016 and what happened was your fault; you will obey us this time,” while progressives are saying “No, you ignored us in 2016 and what happened was your fault; you will listen to us this time.” The early 2020 presidential race is repeating the same battle of official narrative manufactured by corporate elites versus the organic zeitgeist–the way ordinary people are feeling inside as a result of the conditions their government has put them in. I’m not sure how much coverage I’ll be giving to the U.S. presidential election this time around, but it will be interesting to see how this dynamic plays out.
America has a Trump-Biden problem at the root of its current politics. As former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich explained in the video below. "It's oligarchy versus democracy. When oligarchs fill the coffers of political candidates, they neuter democracy. The oligarchs know politicians won't bite the hands that feed them. As long as they control the money, they can be confident there will be no meaningful response to stagnant pay, the climate crisis, military bloat, or the soaring costs of health insurance, pharmaceuticals, college and housing. There'll be no tax increases on the wealthy. They're be almost no anti-trust enforcement to picture the power of giant corporations, no meaningful regulation of Wall Street's addiction to gambling with other people's money, no end to corporate subsidies. CEO pay will continue to skyrocket. Wall Street hedge fund and private equity managers will continue to make out like bandits. So long as the oligarchy divides Americans." The solution is staring us in the face: Bernie is the agent of change we need, desperately need.
