Author and researcher James Perloff joins us once again, this time to discuss his most recent book, “Truth Is A Lonely Warrior.” We discuss a range of subjects covered by the book, from false flag events and pretexts for war to the depopulation agenda, Zionism, the Rockefeller-funded ecumenical movement, the culture creation industry and more. We also engage in a discussion on differences in political ideology and the solution to the global government agenda.
Update: Note received from James Perloff after the interview:
There’s a clarification I’d like to make regarding your early question of whether the Establishment is patriotic or anti-patriotic. They are absolutely anti-patriotic and anti-sovereignty. This is proven by everything they write in in their internal organs such as the journal Foreign Affairs. Their occasional public flag-waving is simply to motivate young men to enlist and the people to get behind their wars.
Just to take World War I as an example, the war was used to destroy the sovereignty of other empires and nations–such as the Ottoman Empire, Austro-Hungarian Empire, Russia, the kaiser’s Germany, etc. Europe was sweepingly restructured and brought loosely under the internationalist League of Nations. But to get American soldiers to partake in this plan of nation-destruction, here in America the flag was waved, Uncle Sam appeared on recruiting posters, and people were told they were ‘defending America.’ However, these patriotics were propaganda solely for the purpose of manipulating of the public, and that process continues to this day, as when soldiers are sent to the Middle East on the pretext that they are defending our freedoms.
Ultimately, they have America’s sovereignty in their gun sights as well, as proven by the CFR’s push for a North American Union.
In the interview, I said it depended on context, and I don’t think my answer communicated it with adequate clarity, as is apt to happen in an impromptu response.
Update 2: Received from James Perloff August 11th
James, since you kindly posted my comments on democracy, I’d like to try adding add a couple more.
In our first interview, on the Shadows of Power, we’d been totally on the same page; so I was unprepared for challenges in the second interview. This is my fault, but I’d like to add further perspective that I consider relevant, but that I didn’t think of spur-of-the-moment.
(1) Regarding monarchies—this is not a major focus of Truth Is a Lonely Warrior, it is one section of one chapter, out of nearly 30 chapters and appendices. I was certainly not raised a monarchist; I grew up in a middle-class American home and was taught what a tyrant King George III supposedly was. However, in years of study I discovered that the Illuminati had their own reasons for denigrating monarchs. In the interview, I pointed out that many monarchies were destroyed because they symbolized nationhood, which stood in the way of world government.
But there is more to it. The Rothschild/banksters knew they could not insinuate themselves into the bloodline of an emperor or king. By eliminating monarchies, and replacing them with “democracy,” the banksters knew they would need only 51 percent of the vote to take over a nation. And when you own the media, 51 percent is a cinch. Also, monarchies tended to unify nations, whereas democracy inherently divides them (into political factions); a divided country is easier to conquer. This is simply the “divide and conquer” principle.
The czars executed 467 people between 1826 and 1904, but millions died under Lenin and Stalin. There were seven prisoners in the Bastille when it was stormed, but more than a million Frenchmen died in the post-Louis Reign of Terror. More people were executed by Ayatollah Khomeini during his first month in power than by the Shah of Iran during 38 years on the throne. I am NOT glorifying monarchs; but I am saying their “tyranny” was greatly exaggerated by others who had their own agenda for restructuring the world.
(2) You noted the paucity of footnotes in the culture-music chapter. I do want to mention that the chapter is only 3 pages long. I’d also like to comment on the approach of intelligence veterans like John Coleman. I have read all the newsletters of Hilaire du Berrier, dated 1958 to 2001. Du Berrier was in the OSS (the CIA’s forerunner) and had an extensive network of intelligence contacts. Sometimes his newsletter quoted a book or newspaper, and you could double-check it. But SOME information came from his personal intelligence contacts, and there was no way to verify it.
If we dismiss this category of information because it’s not footnoted to an accessible source, we risk omitting a lot of valuable information. OK, so how can I prove du Berrier wasn’t fabricating a particular statement? Usually, I can’t. But over 43 years, I found him trustworthy, a man whose observations were predictive, a man of integrity NOT given to sensationalism. He was no Hearst “Yellow Journalist.” As to Coleman, he has made the same observation about his critics. How is he supposed to footnote something seen in an intelligence file? MI6 is not a public library; we can’t go there and ask for the file. And let me just flip it here: footnotes themselves are no guarantors of credibility; I can produce copious footnotes linked to books and journals that are themselves sources of misinformation. Here is where discernment becomes vital.
I, too, would like to see more that supports Coleman’s remarks about the Beatles, but their intense coverage and promotion by the MSM of that day (TV networks, covers of Look and Newsweek, etc.) strongly suggests the Establishment’s hand at work. Of course, James, if Time Magazine puts YOU AND ME on its cover, I’ll reconsider.
SHOW NOTES
James Perloff’s website
Truth Is A Lonely Warrior
The Shadows of Power
Corbett Report Interview 901 – James Perloff Exposes the CFR Agenda