I have been in an uphill battle for years now in trying to get people everywhere to understand that this fear of man caused "Global Warming" or what the criminals behind the scam sometimes call "Climate Change" is a complete and utter fraud.... I have put up post after post here at this blog showing clear and factual evidence that this scam is being done on purpose as a method of "fleecing" the public out of their wealth for the scam of "carbon taxation"..... I had for years thought that my efforts have been in vain for there was little evidence to show that anyone else, and especially those in what I call the real "truth movement", was wanting to tackle this very important issue.. At least until now...I want to present the following report that just came out today from one of my fellow Canadian "truth seekers" Penny, who of course hails from the wilds of southern Ontario and writes the blog "Penny For Your Thoughts" at www.pennyforyourthoughts2.blogspot.com..... It is entitled: "PhD Physicist Says Evidence Of Major Human Role In Climate Is "Lacking"... Sees "Abuse Of Science"", and is a must read by everyone for it does indeed bring forward even more evidence that this "Global Warming" scare is indeed a scam... I have that article from Penny right here for everyone to see for themselves, and of course my own thoughts and comments to follow:
Tuesday, October 2, 2018
PhD Physicist Says Evidence Of Major Human Role In Climate “Is Lacking” …Sees “Abuses Of Science”
Link What follows is a taste of what readers can expect from the book. Ideal present for the upcoming Christmas season.
===========================================PhD physicist Ralph B. Alexander has authored a new book: Science Under Attack: The Age of Unreason.
Evidence Lacking for Major Human Role in Climate Change
By Ralph B. AlexanderConventional scientific wisdom holds that global warming and consequent changes in the climate are primarily our own doing. But what few people realize is that the actual scientific evidence for a substantial human contribution to climate change is flimsy. It requires highly questionable computer climate models to make the connection between global warming and human emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2).
No proof warming is human caused
The multiple lines of evidence which do exist are simply evidence that the world is warming, not proof that the warming comes predominantly from human activity. The supposed proof relies entirely on computer models that attempt to simulate the earth’s highly complex climate and include greenhouse gases as well as aerosols from both volcanic and man-made sources – but almost totally ignore natural variability.
Models way off mark
So it shouldn’t be surprising that the models have a dismal track record in predicting the future. Most spectacularly, the models failed to predict the recent pause or hiatus in global warming from the late 1990s to about 2014. During this period, the warming rate dropped to only a third to a half of the rate measured from the early 1970s to 1998, while at the same time CO2 kept spewing into the atmosphere. Out of 32 climate models, only a lone Russian model came anywhere close to the actual observations.
Add caption
Not only did the models overestimate the warming rate by two or three times, they wrongly predict a hot spot in the upper atmosphere that isn’t there, and are unable to accurately reproduce sea level rise. Yet it’s these same failed models that underpin the whole case for catastrophic consequences of man-made climate change, a case embodied in the 2015 Paris Agreement. The international agreement on reducing greenhouse gas emissions – which 195 nations, together with many of the world’s scientific societies and national academies, have signed on to – is based not on empirical evidence, but on artificial computer models. Only the models link climate change to human activity. The empirical evidence does not.
Correlation is not causation
Correlation is not causation:"The invalid assumption that correlation implies cause is probably among the two or three most serious and common errors of human reasoning."
Proponents of human-caused global warming, including a majority of climate scientists, insist that the boost to global temperatures of about 1.6 degrees Fahrenheit (0.9 degrees Celsius) since 1850 comes almost exclusively from the steady increase in the atmospheric CO2 level. They argue that elevated CO2 must be the cause of nearly all the warming because the sole major change in climate “forcing” over this period has been from CO2 produced by human activities – mainly the burning of fossil fuels as well as deforestation. But correlation is not causation,as is well known from statistics or the public health field of epidemiology. So believers in the narrative of catastrophic anthropogenic (human-caused) climate change fall back on computer models to shore up their argument.
With the climate change narrative trumpeted by political entities such as the UN’s IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), and amplified by compliant media worldwide, predictions of computer climate models have acquired the status of quasi-religious edicts.
Warmists on the wrong side of science
Indeed, anyone disputing the conventional wisdom is labeled a “denier” by advocates of climate change orthodoxy, who claim that global warming skeptics are just as anti-science as those who believe vaccines cause autism. The much ballyhooed war on science typically lumps climate change skeptics together with creationists, anti-vaccinationists and anti-GMO activists. But the climate warmists are the ones on the wrong side of science.
Of course employing name calling is just another propaganda tactic ..Name-calling as a propaganda device attaches negative attributes to an opponent or those who might threaten.
“Fear, hyperbole, heavy-handed tactics”
Like their counterparts in the debate over the safety of GMOs, warmists employ fear, hyperbole and heavy-handed political tactics in an attempt to shut down debate. Yet skepticism about the human influence on global warming persists, and may even be growing among the general public. In 2018, a Gallup poll in the U.S. found that 36% of Americans don’t believe that global warming is caused by human activity, while a UK survey showed that a staggering 64% of the British public feel the same way. And the percentage of climate scientists who endorse the mainstream view of a strong human influence is nowhere near the widely believed 97%, although it’s probably above 50%. Most scientists who are skeptics like me accept that global warming is real, but not that it’s entirely man-made or that it’s dangerous. The observations alone aren’t evidence for a major human role. Such lack of regard for the importance of empirical evidence, and misguided faith in the power of deficient computer climate models, are abuses of science.
Another common misleading tactic employed by the warmista's is the Red Herring: " While it is similar to the avoiding the issue fallacy, the red herring is a deliberate diversion of attention with the intention of trying to abandon the originalargument" ie: ignore what that questioner is asking they are on the payroll of big oil Shouldn't be stated as fact with no proof that it is true...Posted by Penny at 8:41 AM NTS Notes: I have indeed noticed that Penny has begun to take this "Global Warming" fraud as seriously as I have for years now... And I do want to thank her for that, and say "welcome to my world"!Lets face the facts here... This man caused "Global Warming" scheme has always been a fraud and nothing more than false fear-mongering to try to scare gullible people into surrendering their wealth for this "carbon tax" swindle..... And sadly too many people have fallen for this trap and will indeed surrender their money gladly and stupidly and will get ABSOLUTELY NOTHING in return!Living here in Canada, I am deeply ashamed of my fellow brain dead Canadians who are about to be fleeced royally by that crooked Liberal government under that heinous Justin Trudeau who is indeed about to ram through "legislation" that will make the fraud "carbon tax" the law of the land... And as I stated in last weekend's rant, we as Canadians are about to be bled by forking over some $1500 on average per person annually for this "carbon tax" swindle.. The reality is of course that money collected will absolutely not be going towards any "carbon footprint" reduction bullshit, but will disappear into the cesspool of federal general revenues....One other note: I need not remind everyone that the whole concept of "carbon taxation" is in itself a fraud.. Carbon Dioxide is absolutely NOT this horrendous "greenhouse gas" that the swindlers claim, but is a necessity for life itself on this planet... The increases in Carbon Dioxide in our atmosphere that the con men claim is doing "harm" to this planet has in fact done wonders for plant life as a whole.. And we are dependent on that plant life for life giving Oxygen! As far as I am concerned, we should be rejecting any of this bullshit of "carbon taxation" and "reducing carbon footprints", and be putting out all the CO2 we can for the benefit of our plant life!More to comeNTS