Language
Undefined
0
No votes yet
AFD symposium in the Bundestag: A possible attempt at a Trojan horse?
https://t.me/NextLevelOriginal/354
telegram translate:
In the run-up to Prof. Bhakdi's lecture in the Bundestag on November 11th, it is crucial that we engage with the information he will present and critically question it. It is our duty to provide clarity and point out misinformation that could cloud public perception.
Does Bhakdi overlook the weaknesses of the McKernan study?
Prof. Bhakdi appears to repeat Kevin McKernan's claims without considering the significant weaknesses in McKernan's study.
https://osf.io/b9t7m/
McKernan has relied on indirect methods that provide no direct evidence.
The results reported by Bhakdi et al. The line of argument pursued distracts from the actual dangers of vaccination and keeps outdated ideas about genetics, virology and detection techniques such as PCR alive. This delays the necessary confrontation with these outdated dogmas and their refutation and allows the true causes of possible vaccine damage to fade into the background.
- Real dangers of “vaccines” are ignored
It is important to emphasize that the nanoparticles and adjuvants used in the vaccines require thorough scientific study to understand their full potential for side effects. These substances are crucial for direct, mild to fatal damage.
———————————
McKernan study: Trojan horse?
- The authors confirm the limitation regarding the unknown origin of the vaccine vials, which were sent anonymously and without cold packs. All monovalent vaccines examined in this study had expired beyond the expiration date stated on the vial. This raises concerns about storage conditions and the potential degradation of RNA relative to DNA, which could skew DNA-to-RNA ratios. Control experiments using vials of known origin and storage history would have been crucial to validate the results.
- Plasmide DNA was not detected directly, but only indirectly via the unacceptable and highly distorting process of sequencing ("puzzle"), instead of direct detection by isolating the plasmids.
- It would have to be proven that these inserted plasmids are located in human chromosomes. This was not done either, although it would be easy if one followed the basic assumptions of their hypothesis.
- The central investigation was the contamination ratio of DNA to RNA. The study that Prof. Bhakdi plans to present claims DNA contamination in vaccine samples based on a comparison of the ratio of RNA to DNA.However, this approach is misleading because the RNA degrades quickly if not refrigerated. The mRNA vaccines usually need to be stored at -70 to -80 degrees Celsius to prevent RNA degradation. If this standard is not met, the rapid loss of RNA leads to an apparently increased proportion of DNA, which can be incorrectly interpreted as DNA contamination. The study results are therefore compromised by improper storage and are not reliable.
Call for scientific responsibility
Bhakdi and his team's approach leads us to a dead end in which firmly held assumptions about how genetics, virology and detection methods such as PCR work remain unchallenged. This further delays the knowledge of the refutations of these outdated dogmas, both among experts and the general public, and the actual causes of the dangerous vaccine damage are increasingly lost sight of.
By relying on this study, you open up a wide front of attack for the vaccine manufacturers, making it easy for them to invalidate the study results and miss the opportunity to present simple, robust and precisely verifiable facts.
NEXT LEVEL CoPilot
https://www.wissen-neu-gedacht.de/copilot
-