Visit ArabTopics.com

Why the Results of the Normandy Four Summit Were Predetermined… Almost

The media loves to make any sort of peace process look like a personal matter between two sides with hurt feelings, when nothing could be further from the truth. These deals are not a matter of emotions or being nice but achieving political objectives. Very often conflicts remain stagnant because there is no possible point of compromise between both forces– there is simply two diametrically opposed objectives to be satisfied by some sort of deal.. The negotiations regarding the horrific situation in Ukraine that have taken place are a perfect example of “peace process” that makes zero progress because it has virtually no wiggle room to work with. So will the Normandy Four Paris Summit actually be able to achieve anything? The answer to this lies in the positions of those involved.

Europe

The EU has probably the most flexibility position-wise in this negotiation if it can shed the US yoke. Washington has had a very strong grip over European politics, strong enough to get them to support anti-Russian sanctions that have been hell for EU economies. But right now, we are starting to see a measurable decline in US global hegemony: Trump pushing for Fortress America, Macron openly discussing a post-NATO European military future, and non-superpower Russia making major foreign policy victories despite US efforts. This means that Europe could possibly (finally) take steps to resolving certain issues like the Ukraine that are not approved from across the pond.

For Europe the conflict in the Donbass is a bit of ugliness from a bygone era that would best swept under the rug and forgotten. Although some EU faces appeared at the Maidan protests, the majority of foreign support and financing came from the US/State Department, i.e. the French and the Germans really never asked for an anti-Russian Maidan uprising and don’t seemed thrilled with having to deal with its consequences. It is a mess that they do not want to clean up.

From Berlin and Paris the war in the Donbass looks like one clan of pale aborigines fighting against nuclear-armed resource-rich pale aborigines, so guess who’s side it makes the most sense to take? Appeasing Russia at the cost of losing more Slavic migrant workers to clean toilets in London or work as prostitutes in Amsterdam is a low-cost high-benefit position. As we have seen core Western “values” are very flexible when they need to be and Ukraine simply offers Europe nothing but problems whereas Russian appeasement is very good for peace and business.

If Europe has the freedom to act in its own self-interest it will wash its hands of the Donbass and throw Kiev under the bus.

The United States

When it comes to Washington, it is really a question of which Washington is pulling the strings. Trump for example, sees China as America’s key threat that Russia could be used to leverage against. Foreign Policy’s website (which often reflects Beltway thinking out loud) even has a piece about how Ukraine should just “let the Donbass go”. Libertarian/Paleo-Conservatives like Ron Paul and Pat Buchanan have been quite outspoken as to the pointlessness of risking nuclear war over a region of the world that means nothing for Americans and everything for Russians.

However, there are plenty of PNAC faithful Cold Warriors still pushing for sanctions and looking for Russian influence in every shadow for whom the Donbass is a critical issue and somehow critical to the future of Democracy and Freedom. As Brzeziński put it “It cannot be stressed enough that without Ukraine, Russia ceases to be an empire…” and not only is he right about this, but the warhawks know he is right. So they are never going to back down on pushing for maximum Russophobia and chaos in the Ukraine.

Today’s Ukrainian mess is a roadblock to Russian greatness and the total inability of Moscow to save Russian culture in Ukraine is humiliating and damaging to the stability of Putin’s government as a whole. Russia did get Crimea and a portion of the breakaway Republics but ultimately as it stands now the US won the battle of Maidan and has taken more than ~85% of the country. This is a humiliating loss for Russia/Putin and everyone in Russia knows this, which means it is the biggest win for hardcore Russophobes so far in the 21st century.

It must also be noted that Trump has given up on making relations with Russia a key issue, as he promised during his campaign, in order to keep his Presidency afloat. No one in Washington, given the current paranoid climate will be willing to take Russia’s “side” on this issue. But often inaction is the strongest form of action and Trump may just sit back and let the Europeans do the work, i.e. do whatever it takes to make this situation go away.

Russia

As stated above Russia cannot be “Made Great Again” without at least some of the “Holy Lands” to the south from whence it came. Moscow very purposely a few years back erected a massive statue of Grand Prince Vladimir of Kievan-Rus who brought Orthodox Christianity to the nation. This was a very bold public ideological doubling down that Kiev/Ukraine are an inalienable part of (and the cradle of) Russian civilization. That massive statue is a symbols of Russia’s long term mission down south.

Now that Russia has en masse issued passports (i.e. citizenship) to residents of the breakaway Republics in the Donbass, they have created the same “beachhead” that was used during the 2008 war in Georgia. When Saakashvili attacked locals with dual Russian citizenship Moscow felt obliged to safeguard their own citizens militarily, which de facto retook large portions of lost territory with a minimal amount of blood and machinery being lost.

Furthermore, if we look at the participants of the Summit we see, Kiev, Paris, Berlin and Moscow at the table. There are no representatives (officially) either from America or the Donbass itself meaning that Europe and Kiev already acknowledge Moscow as the real power in the region with whom they need to make a deal. Kiev could make the excuse that they excluded representatives from the Republics “don’t deal with terrorists” but they have already made deals with them in the past, giving them legitimacy, which was an inexcusable mistake from the standpoint of International Relations. As soon as you acknowledge another party as having some legitimacy it is very hard to ever take it back.

In short, Russia’s position is going to be the most unyielding of all. They simply cannot back down and surrender the Donbass to be slaughtered by Kiev. If they were to allow this then Putin will have annulled everything he has achieved over the last 20 years and it could even become the death blow to end all of Russian civilization. Surrender is not an option.

The Russians took Crimea via referendum risking WWIII without even blinking as it was critical for survival for their civilizational survival in the short term. The Donbass and all pro-Russian areas of Ukraine (and some of the former USSR) are critical for the long term and we shouldn’t be so naive to think they won’t risk another WWIII moment to restore their greatness. As they say “Russia can only be great, or not be at all”.

Kiev

Since it has no political will of its own and is a vassal state, any opinions or words by Kiev only reflect others’ opinions. Kiev is an actor in this process in name only so anything stated about the EU or American position(s) above applies to them.

Zelensky just needs to keep his position in power and his head attached to his shoulders and that should be considered a winning position for him personally.

So what does this mean?

If the views of Washington Warhawks go against Russian Patriots then the stalemate will surely continue as neither can back down. This is an “either or” situation where there can be only one truly satisfied party. This is the most likely result of the Summit will be that absolutely nothing of any real value changes. The standoff will continue indefinitely and thousands more lives will be lost.
However, if Washington is willfully silent or the EU can actually act on its own, then there may begin a process of breaking Ukraine into chunks, which is what should have happened in 2014 as the Russians can live without Western Ukraine and Western Ukraine cannot live with the Russians. A roughly 50/50 break up of this fake nation is really the only option to end the madness that all sides (except for Kiev) can agree upon.

The Russians absolutely cannot back down, The EU would like to, and Trump’s Washington just simply doesn’t care about snow monkeys who have no oil.

Source: 
Strategic Culture

Dear friends of this aggregator

  • Yes, I intentionally removed Newsbud from the aggregator on Mar 22.
  • Newsbud did not block the aggregator, although their editor blocked me on twitter after a comment I made to her
  • As far as I know, the only site that blocks this aggregator is Global Research. I have no idea why!!
  • Please stop recommending Newsbud and Global Research to be added to the aggregator.

Support this site

News Sources

Source Items
Please Stop the Ride 24
The Infectious Myth 22
Lockdown Skeptics 26
Sam Husseini 32
Dr. Andrew Kaufman 3
Swiss Propaganda Research 20
Off Guardian 82
Cory Morningstar 10
James Bovard 51
WWI Hidden History 51
Grayzone Project 429
Pass Blue 376
Dilyana Gaytandzhieva 17
John Pilger 426
The Real News 367
Scrutinised Minds 29
Need To Know News 3388
FEE 5425
Marine Le Pen 403
Francois Asselineau 25
Opassande 53
HAX on 5July 220
Henrik Alexandersson 1228
Mohamed Omar 404
Professors Blog 10
Arg Blatte Talar 40
Angry Foreigner 19
Fritte Fritzson 12
Teologiska rummet 32
Filosofiska rummet 144
Vetenskapsradion Historia 196
Snedtänkt (Kalle Lind) 262
Les Crises 3954
Richard Falk 220
Ian Sinclair 136
SpinWatch 61
Counter Currents 12609
Kafila 661
Gail Malone 45
Transnational Foundation 221
Rick Falkvinge 95
The Duran 11383
Vanessa Beeley 216
Nina Kouprianova 9
MintPress 6104
Paul Craig Roberts 2569
News Junkie Post 74
Nomi Prins 27
Kurt Nimmo 191
Strategic Culture 6164
Sir Ken Robinson 30
Stephan Kinsella 120
Liberty Blitzkrieg 885
Sami Bedouin 65
Consortium News 2685
21 Century Wire 4143
Burning Blogger 324
Stephen Gowans 102
David D. Friedman 165
Anarchist Standard 16
The BRICS Post 1541
Tom Dispatch 632
Levant Report 18
The Saker 5132
The Barnes Review 603
John Friend 535
Psyche Truth 160
Jonathan Cook 162
New Eastern Outlook 4914
School Sucks Project 1828
Giza Death Star 2185
Andrew Gavin Marshall 28
Red Ice Radio 687
GMWatch 2595
Robert Faurisson 150
Espionage History Archive 35
Jay's Analysis 1177
Le 4ème singe 91
Jacob Cohen 222
Agora Vox 19568
Cercle Des Volontaires 456
Panamza 2611
Fairewinds 121
Project Censored 1253
Spy Culture 628
Conspiracy Archive 85
Crystal Clark 14
Timothy Kelly 649
PINAC 1482
The Conscious Resistance 1056
Independent Science News 91
The Anti Media 6877
Positive News 820
Brandon Martinez 30
Steven Chovanec 61
Lionel 317
The Mind renewed 460
Natural Society 2627
Yanis Varoufakis 1145
Tragedy & Hope 122
Dr. Tim Ball 114
Web of Debt 167
Porkins Policy Review 457
Conspiracy Watch 174
Eva Bartlett 646
Libyan War Truth 373
DeadLine Live 1916
Kevin Ryan 69
BSNEWS 2129
Aaron Franz 270
Traces of Reality 166
Revelations Radio News 124
Dr. Bruce Levine 160
Peter B Collins 1795
Faux Capitalism 205
Dissident Voice 11993
Climate Audit 227
Donna Laframboise 511
Judith Curry 1192
Geneva Business Insider 40
Media Monarchy 2738
Syria Report 84
Human Rights Investigation 94
Intifada (Voice of Palestine) 1685
Down With Tyranny 13634
Laura Wells Solutions 50
Video Rebel's Blog 483
Revisionist Review 485
Aletho News 22978
ضد العولمة 27
Penny for your thoughts 3403
Northerntruthseeker 2912
كساريات 37
Color Revolutions and Geopolitics 27
Stop Nato 4888
AntiWar.com Blog 3425
AntiWar.com Original Content 7682
Corbett Report 2670
Stop Imperialism 491
Land Destroyer 1299
Webster Tarpley Website 1154

Compiled Feeds

Public Lists

Title Visibility
Funny Public