Is the US on a Major About-turn on Iran?


In May 2018, more than a year ago, when the US threw the hard-negotiated nuclear deal with Iran out of the window of the Oval office, it did not come as a surprise, for Donald Trump was only fulfilling the promise he had made to his voters during his presidential election campaign the year before. When the deal was thrown out, the secretary of state, Mike Pompeo, made a speech in Washington and laid down 12 demands that, if Iran fulfilled them, would pave the way for normalisation of US relations with Iran and bring ‘peace’ in the Middle East. Among other things, his demands included an end of “proliferation of ballistic missiles”, “withdraw all forces under Iran’s command throughout the entirety of Syria”, “End the Islamic Revolutionary Guard corps-linked Quds Force’s support for “terrorists” and “militant” partners around the world”, and end its “threatening behaviour” towards its neighbours i.e., the UAE and Saudi Arabia.

None of the demands was about making Iran abide by the deal (because Iran wasn’t in violation) and only two were strictly about proliferation of nuclear weapons and/or uranium enrichment, although no evidence existed, and none exists to-date, that shows Iran was/is developing uranium beyond its limits or that it was/is taking steps towards potential proliferation of nuclear weapons. By focusing on Iran’s regional policies and influence, the US showed that it only wanted Iran to roll back and end expansion of political influence.

However, while Iran’s influence remains very much intact in Syria and in Iraq and elsewhere, Mike Pompeo’s recent offer to engage “unconditionally” with Iran in talks shows that the very author of the 12 demands has backed out of his otherwise non-negotiable conditions of talks with Iran. “We are prepared to engage in a conversation with no preconditions. We are ready to sit down with them,” said Pompeo in a news conference in Switzerland on June 2, 2019, although he also said that the US would continue to make efforts to roll back Iranian influence in the region.

What really is important here is the question of why is the US offering unconditional talks to Iran at a time when its (the US) president thinks that their sanctions on Iran are really working?

Donald Trump was recently in Japan where he minced no words in highlight how his sanctions were really ‘working’. To quote him, “Iran, when I first came into office, was a terror.  They were fighting in many locations all over the Middle East.  They were behind every single major attack, whether it was Syria, whether it was Yemen, whether it was individual smaller areas, whether it was taking away oil from people.  They were involved with everything…..Now they’re pulling back because they’re got serious economic problems.  We have massive — as you know, massive sanctions and other things.  I mean, we just said the other day: steel, copper, different elements of what they used to sell.  The oil is essentially dried up.”

However, despite the fact that Donald Trump thinks that his sanctions are working, he, too, seemed to sound a reconciliatory note during his press conference in Japan and said “and I think we’ll make a deal.  I think Iran — again, I think Iran has tremendous economic potential.  And I look forward to letting them get back to the stage where they can show that.  I think Iran — I know so many people from Iran.  These are great people.  It has a chance to be a great country, with the same leadership.”

The Trump administration is, as is evident, in a U-turn mode. One wonders why would that be the case if sanctions are working and why not let Iran ‘sink’ in the sea of sanctions and force it to emerge as a ‘reformed’ actor? This would obviously be the case unless the sanctions, as opposed to what Trump said in Japan, aren’t actually working. While sanctions have certainly hurt Iran’s economy; US sanctions have essentially failed to modify Iran’s policy the way the US and its allies would have ideally wanted.

A second reason for why the US is now finding itself in a U-turn mode is that Iran, instead of capitulating, has raised the stakes by moving an inch closer to closing the Strait of Hormuz. According to some analysts, if the Strait is blocked and the flow of energy from the Gulf—which is about twenty per cent of the whole world—-is completely shut down, it could lead to the price of oil reaching $200 a barrel, or much higher over an extended period. This would potentially crash the derivatives market, creating an unprecedented global depression. The Bank for International Settlements said last year that the “notional amount outstanding for derivatives contracts” was $542 trillion.

While it is not for the first time that Iran has threatened closure, what really makes it a serious threat today is that stakes have equally been never higher for Iran or even for the US.

While the US officials continue to mention that they would continue to pursue Iranian roll-back, there is little to no gainsaying that achieving this is hard to materialise, given that Iran, even after facing toughest ever US sanctions, has managed to bring the situation to a stalemate where the U.S. now feels compelled to change the tone and initiate the talk of ‘unconditional talks with Iran.’

This is a paradigm shift, evident also from the way US naval deployment has already started to decrease in the Persian Gulf. The USS Abraham Lincoln, which was scheduled to move towards the region, has stopped in the Arabian Sea, some 200 miles off the coast of Oman. Naval officials are also praising Iran for its professional behaviour. Rear Adm. John F. G. Wade, commander of the Lincoln strike group, said Iran’s naval forces have adhered to international standards of interaction with ships in his group. There are thus already signs of no-conflict in the Gulf and mediation and talks to ease down the military stand-off even if a deal doesn’t immediately take place.

Salman Rafi Sheikh, research-analyst of International Relations and Pakistan’s foreign and domestic affairs, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.

New Eastern Outlook

Dear friends of this aggregator

  • Yes, I intentionally removed Newsbud from the aggregator on Mar 22.
  • Newsbud did not block the aggregator, although their editor blocked me on twitter after a comment I made to her
  • As far as I know, the only site that blocks this aggregator is Global Research. I have no idea why!!
  • Please stop recommending Newsbud and Global Research to be added to the aggregator.

Support this site

News Sources

Source Items
WWI Hidden History 51
Grayzone Project 193
Pass Blue 220
Dilyana Gaytandzhieva 14
John Pilger 416
The Real News 367
Scrutinised Minds 29
Need To Know News 2660
FEE 4714
Marine Le Pen 380
Francois Asselineau 25
Opassande 53
HAX on 5July 220
Henrik Alexandersson 943
Mohamed Omar 377
Professors Blog 10
Arg Blatte Talar 40
Angry Foreigner 18
Fritte Fritzson 12
Teologiska rummet 32
Filosofiska rummet 110
Vetenskapsradion Historia 157
Snedtänkt (Kalle Lind) 221
Les Crises 2863
Richard Falk 170
Ian Sinclair 111
SpinWatch 61
Counter Currents 9724
Kafila 492
Gail Malone 41
Transnational Foundation 221
Rick Falkvinge 95
The Duran 9839
Vanessa Beeley 133
Nina Kouprianova 9
MintPress 5650
Paul Craig Roberts 1877
News Junkie Post 58
Nomi Prins 27
Kurt Nimmo 191
Strategic Culture 4892
Sir Ken Robinson 25
Stephan Kinsella 100
Liberty Blitzkrieg 854
Sami Bedouin 64
Consortium News 2685
21 Century Wire 3608
Burning Blogger 324
Stephen Gowans 91
David D. Friedman 152
Anarchist Standard 16
The BRICS Post 1518
Tom Dispatch 530
Levant Report 18
The Saker 4373
The Barnes Review 531
John Friend 481
Psyche Truth 160
Jonathan Cook 145
New Eastern Outlook 4076
School Sucks Project 1780
Giza Death Star 1945
Andrew Gavin Marshall 15
Red Ice Radio 617
GMWatch 2332
Robert Faurisson 150
Espionage History Archive 34
Jay's Analysis 994
Le 4ème singe 90
Jacob Cohen 210
Agora Vox 15810
Cercle Des Volontaires 436
Panamza 2203
Fairewinds 117
Project Censored 953
Spy Culture 542
Conspiracy Archive 76
Crystal Clark 11
Timothy Kelly 575
PINAC 1482
The Conscious Resistance 851
Independent Science News 80
The Anti Media 6700
Positive News 820
Brandon Martinez 30
Steven Chovanec 61
Lionel 296
The Mind renewed 443
Natural Society 2619
Yanis Varoufakis 1009
Tragedy & Hope 122
Dr. Tim Ball 114
Web of Debt 147
Porkins Policy Review 428
Conspiracy Watch 174
Eva Bartlett 603
Libyan War Truth 337
DeadLine Live 1913
Kevin Ryan 64
Aaron Franz 238
Traces of Reality 166
Revelations Radio News 121
Dr. Bruce Levine 149
Peter B Collins 1593
Faux Capitalism 205
Dissident Voice 10880
Climate Audit 224
Donna Laframboise 446
Judith Curry 1136
Geneva Business Insider 40
Media Monarchy 2428
Syria Report 78
Human Rights Investigation 93
Intifada (Voice of Palestine) 1685
Down With Tyranny 12076
Laura Wells Solutions 44
Video Rebel's Blog 439
Revisionist Review 485
Aletho News 20745
ضد العولمة 27
Penny for your thoughts 3046
Northerntruthseeker 2416
كساريات 37
Color Revolutions and Geopolitics 27
Stop Nato 4715 Blog 3103 Original Content 7018
Corbett Report 2390
Stop Imperialism 491
Land Destroyer 1207
Webster Tarpley Website 1112

Compiled Feeds

Public Lists

Title Visibility
Funny Public