Visit ArabTopics.com

Trump’s Desperate, Last-Ditch Effort To Hike Tensions With Iran-- This Might Be The Final Stretch For His Failed Policy Of Maximum Pressure

Iranian civilians are endangered by recent sabotage carried out  against both military and civilian targets. Here a woman sells spices in the bazaar. Photo: Reese Erlich

-by Reese Erlich
author, The Iran Agenda Today: The Real Story Inside Iran and What's Wrong with U.S. Policy.

During the past month, Iran has suffered a half-dozen explosions and fires at military and civilian sites. A bomb blew up near the Parchin missile base outside Tehran, Iran’s capital. Fires broke out at an electric power station and aboard seven ships in a southern port city.

Iranian government authorities say some of the incidents were accidents. But the most serious, it appears, was an act of sabotage.

On July 2, a blast ripped through the main assembly hall at Natanz, a facility that produces centrifuge parts essential for enriching uranium for Iran’s nuclear power program.

No one officially took credit for the sabotage, but the New York Times reported that a “Middle East intelligence” source admitted that Israel was behind the bombing. An Israeli newspaper later identified the source as Yossi Cohen, head of the Mossad intelligence agency.

Analysts say such a brazen attack, which constitutes an act of war, would need the approval of officials in Washington, D.C.

“If the US did not participate in the attack directly, at the very least it gave Israel its consent,” Muhammad Sahimi, a professor at the University of Southern California and Iran expert, says in an interview.

Washington and Tel Aviv think such attacks, along with the unilateral U.S. sanctions, are a low-risk means of pushing back on Iran. They are an escalation of Washington’s “maximum pressure” campaign—which has notably failed and will likely be abandoned after the U.S. presidential election.

“There’s a sense that there’s a bit of desperation right now” in both capitals, says Trita Parsi, executive vice president and co-founder of the Quincy Institute, an anti-interventionist think tank in Washington, D.C. He likens the attempts to those of medieval archers fighting a losing battle: “Empty your quiver... shoot all your arrows.”

October surprise?

Some analysts speculate that the Trump Administration is seeking to provoke Iran into military retaliation. Trump could then launch a war, rally support at home, and win the election. It’s a classic “October Surprise” or even a “Wag the Dog” scenario.

But Foad Izadi does not agree with that analysis.

“Iran is not Iraq,” Izadi, an assistant professor of American studies at the University of Tehran, tells me by phone from Tehran. “Any overt war runs the danger of serious US casualties. He should know, after being President for almost four years, attacking Iran has consequences.”

Izadi does not think that “starting a new war with Iran a few months before the election” is in Trump’s interest. “Even a limited war is not useful for him.”

But that doesn’t preclude other forms of U.S. aggression.

On July 23, a U.S. fighter jet flew close to an Iranian civilian airliner on a routine flight from Tehran, as it crossed Syria on its way to Beirut, Lebanon. The U.S. military claimed to be conducting a “visual inspection” of the plane in order to “ensure the safety of coalition personnel at At Tanf garrison,” says Captain Bill Urban, spokesperson for US Central Command.

Urban claimed the F-15 fighter jet kept 1,000 yards away from the airliner. But a video shot by passengers shows a jet flying much closer. The proximity of the F-15 forced the Iranian pilot to drop 14,000 feet in four minutes, injuring several passengers.

According to Izadi, the US military has no business “inspecting” a civilian airliner flying in a normal civilian air corridor over Syria. In fact, he says, the United States “has no right to be in Syria at all.”

The Trump Administration keeps several hundred troops in Syria in defiance of the Syrian government and without authorization from the United Nations or any other international body.

Iranians are particularly sensitive about US interactions with civilian planes. In 1988, the U.S. Navy shot down an Iranian airliner, killing all 290 passengers and crew. After initially providing false information about where and how fast the plane was flying, Washington admitted to shooting down the airliner and paid compensation to the victims’ families.

“These things unify the Iranian people,” Izadi says. “Whether they like the government or not, Iranians don’t want to be on a plane that will be shot down.”

Iranian response

To date, the Iranian government has not overtly responded to the U.S. provocations. It seems more likely that Iranian President Hassan Rouhani is waiting for the U.S. election on November 3, which could result in the election of Joe Biden.

“Iranians are holding their fire, playing the long game,” Parsi says. “They fear it may be a trap to give Trump an excuse to go farther.”

Iran’s conservative hardliners, meanwhile, denounce Rouhani as vacillating in the face of a US and Israeli onslaught. But Parsi says these hardliners “are playing a political game. They understand the logic of not doing anything for now, but that doesn’t prevent them from calling Rouhani weak.”

Sahimi, a close observer of Iranian politics, agrees that “there is a lot of ‘hot’ rhetoric against President Rouhani and Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif by the hardliners. But I do not expect any practical action in the near future.”

Depending on what policy the United States adopts after the elections, Sahimi expects “the response to come at a later time and in a manner and at locations where neither Israel nor the US would expect.”

Biden has pledged, if elected, to reverse course on Iran. Izadi believes a Biden Administration would change the Trump policy of maximum pressure. “Whether doing it through rejoining the nuclear agreement or coming up with some other policies, we have to wait and see,” he says.

Parsi, who is familiar with the views of Biden’s Iran advisors, says the new administration would likely call for “compliance for compliance.”

“Biden could lift sanctions by executive order without rejoining the nuclear accord,” he says. “That’s a necessary step, but not sufficient.” The new administration will also have to work with Congress and lay the groundwork for restoring the nuclear accord.

Despite the current crisis, Izadi says, “I’m optimistic. Trump’s policies are not working. The U.S. will have to change, and the change will be for the best.”

Source: 
Down With Tyranny

Dear friends of this aggregator

  • Yes, I intentionally removed Newsbud from the aggregator on Mar 22.
  • Newsbud did not block the aggregator, although their editor blocked me on twitter after a comment I made to her
  • As far as I know, the only site that blocks this aggregator is Global Research. I have no idea why!!
  • Please stop recommending Newsbud and Global Research to be added to the aggregator.

Support this site

News Sources

Source Items
Please Stop the Ride 32
The Infectious Myth 27
Lockdown Skeptics 85
Sam Husseini 34
Dr. Andrew Kaufman 3
Swiss Propaganda Research 51
Off Guardian 197
Cory Morningstar 10
James Bovard 88
WWI Hidden History 51
Grayzone Project 478
Pass Blue 420
Dilyana Gaytandzhieva 17
John Pilger 428
The Real News 367
Scrutinised Minds 29
Need To Know News 3586
FEE 5560
Marine Le Pen 431
Francois Asselineau 25
Opassande 53
HAX on 5July 220
Henrik Alexandersson 1292
Mohamed Omar 404
Professors Blog 10
Arg Blatte Talar 40
Angry Foreigner 19
Fritte Fritzson 12
Teologiska rummet 36
Filosofiska rummet 148
Vetenskapsradion Historia 197
Snedtänkt (Kalle Lind) 266
Les Crises 4174
Richard Falk 231
Ian Sinclair 142
SpinWatch 61
Counter Currents 13022
Kafila 714
Gail Malone 45
Transnational Foundation 221
Rick Falkvinge 95
The Duran 11958
Vanessa Beeley 236
Nina Kouprianova 9
MintPress 6253
Paul Craig Roberts 2765
News Junkie Post 77
Nomi Prins 27
Kurt Nimmo 191
Strategic Culture 6491
Sir Ken Robinson 88
Stephan Kinsella 124
Liberty Blitzkrieg 889
Sami Bedouin 65
Consortium News 2685
21 Century Wire 4335
Burning Blogger 324
Stephen Gowans 105
David D. Friedman 188
Anarchist Standard 16
The BRICS Post 1545
Tom Dispatch 662
Levant Report 18
The Saker 5340
The Barnes Review 623
John Friend 545
Psyche Truth 160
Jonathan Cook 173
New Eastern Outlook 5108
School Sucks Project 1842
Giza Death Star 2249
Andrew Gavin Marshall 28
Red Ice Radio 709
GMWatch 2670
Robert Faurisson 150
Espionage History Archive 35
Jay's Analysis 1217
Le 4ème singe 91
Jacob Cohen 226
Agora Vox 20297
Cercle Des Volontaires 458
Panamza 2676
Fairewinds 124
Project Censored 1273
Spy Culture 634
Conspiracy Archive 85
Crystal Clark 24
Timothy Kelly 669
PINAC 1482
The Conscious Resistance 1125
Independent Science News 94
The Anti Media 6895
Positive News 820
Brandon Martinez 30
Steven Chovanec 61
Lionel 318
The Mind renewed 465
Natural Society 2627
Yanis Varoufakis 1179
Tragedy & Hope 122
Dr. Tim Ball 114
Web of Debt 171
Porkins Policy Review 463
Conspiracy Watch 174
Eva Bartlett 650
Libyan War Truth 382
DeadLine Live 1916
Kevin Ryan 69
BSNEWS 2142
Aaron Franz 279
Traces of Reality 166
Revelations Radio News 128
Dr. Bruce Levine 162
Peter B Collins 1853
Faux Capitalism 205
Dissident Voice 12342
Climate Audit 228
Donna Laframboise 531
Judith Curry 1205
Geneva Business Insider 40
Media Monarchy 2831
Syria Report 84
Human Rights Investigation 94
Intifada (Voice of Palestine) 1685
Down With Tyranny 14051
Laura Wells Solutions 51
Video Rebel's Blog 497
Revisionist Review 485
Aletho News 23528
ضد العولمة 27
Penny for your thoughts 3485
Northerntruthseeker 3110
كساريات 37
Color Revolutions and Geopolitics 27
Stop Nato 4948
AntiWar.com Blog 3503
AntiWar.com Original Content 7862
Corbett Report 2749
Stop Imperialism 491
Land Destroyer 1332
Webster Tarpley Website 1165

Compiled Feeds

Public Lists

Title Visibility
Funny Public