Visit ArabTopics.com

They may not like it, but scientists must work with President Trump

by Judith Curry

Jack Stilgoe and Roger Pielke Jr. have written a superb article on the response of scientists to the Trump presidency.

The reactions from scientists about a Trump presidency are predictable: a disaster for the climate and planet, threats to leave the country, concerns about having to leave their current job that relies on government funding, etc.

In the midst of all this angst (not to mention craziness), Jack Stilgoe and Roger Pielke have published a superb article in the Guardian entitled They may not like it, but scientists must work with Donald Trump.  Excerpts:

Donald Trump has won. Science and scientists played almost no part in the campaign. Now, scientists must consider how they fit into a Trump future.  In the tribal world of US politics, many now find themselves on the outside looking in. Most university scientists are Democrats, and the 2017 President, House and Senate will all be Republican. For this group, nothing portends disaster more than the elevation of a long-time opponent to national and international policies, Myron Ebell of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, to oversee the transformation of the Environmental Protection Agency.

While speculating on details like who Trump will ask to replace John Holdren as his science advisor, scientists should not just be asking what Trump will do for them. They should face up to the difficult question of what they should be doing for Trump.

There are thousands of political appointees, including many science positions, that will need to be nominated, expert advisory bodies constituted and reconstituted, and experts put into staff positions under the White House. Any scientist who agrees to hold their nose and work with the Trump administration should expect much of the same criticism received by Marburger.

No one knows what Trump will do – on science or much else. However, the history of US science funding shows that Republican presidents “appear more eager to spend [money on R&D] than their Democratic counterparts”.
 
How should scientists engage on policy issues such as vaccination and climate change, where Republicans are often accused of being anti-science, or worse, at war with science? Despite Trump’s rhetorical nods to the social conservative wing of his party during the campaign and his enthusiasm for convenient conspiracy theories, he is clearly a pragmatist with little worry about changing his policy preferences.

Scientists should therefore ask themselves whether they would support policies that did what they regard as the right thing, but for the ‘wrong’ reasons. Policies focused on deploying electric vehicles and nuclear or wind power may be justified in purely economic rather than environmental terms. Alternatively, environmental regulations may provide convenient cover for the taxing of imports as the USA struggles to justify a new protectionism. When it comes to climate change, maybe the pragmatic business of policy design might finally take precedence over trying to convince a Republican Congress to see the world through a climate scientist’s eyes.

It would be easy for scientists to bring back an opposition strategy focused on defending a so-called ‘war on science’. Scientists should be aware that the playbook that many followed to oppose President George W Bush may not work as well under a less ideologically-driven president.

For scientists and other experts, the surprise election of Donald Trump to the US presidency comes with choices. How we respond, inside our own communities and in relation to governments will determine whether we remain relevant or jeopardise the constructive role that we should play in policy and politics, regardless of our allegiances.

JC reflections

In my recent post Trumping the Elites, along with my previous posts on the presidential election, I went out of my way to be non-partisan.  I bet none of you has any idea how I voted (I have only told two people).  Nevertheless, I am being roundly criticized for congratulating President Trump in my blog post (e.g. I shouldn’t be patting him on the back or pretending to support him in any way).  Heck, even Hillary Clinton and President Obama congratulated Trump.

I would like to thank Stilgoe and Pielke Jr. for their much needed analysis and statement.

I was struck by an article earlier this week in the WSJ: How Donald Trump Filled the Dignity Deficit.  It is focused on the white working class voters (the so-called ‘deplorables’).  Here’s to hoping that a change from the Obama/Clinton world of encouraging advocacy science can restore dignity the community of scientists that choose not to advocate for progressive causes and prefer to go where the evidence leads them.  Scientists (not to mention professional societies) calling other scientists ‘deniers’ and worse who directly or indirectly challenge their political causes and preferred policy outcomes needs to stop. Otherwise the scientific enterprise in the U.S. risks longterm damage.

JC message to scientists: Lets try to use the opportunity afforded by the election results to minimize advocacy science, support funding priorities that will serve the public good, and provide the best evidenced-based advice (tempered by a careful uncertainty assessment) that we can.

Filed under: Politics, Sociology of science

Source: 
Judith Curry

Dear friends of this aggregator

  • Yes, I intentionally removed Newsbud from the aggregator on Mar 22.
  • Newsbud did not block the aggregator, although their editor blocked me on twitter after a comment I made to her
  • As far as I know, the only site that blocks this aggregator is Global Research. I have no idea why!!
  • Please stop recommending Newsbud and Global Research to be added to the aggregator.

Support this site

News Sources

Source Items
WWI Hidden History 51
Grayzone Project 298
Pass Blue 284
Dilyana Gaytandzhieva 16
John Pilger 421
The Real News 367
Scrutinised Minds 29
Need To Know News 2970
FEE 5046
Marine Le Pen 391
Francois Asselineau 25
Opassande 53
HAX on 5July 220
Henrik Alexandersson 1084
Mohamed Omar 403
Professors Blog 10
Arg Blatte Talar 40
Angry Foreigner 18
Fritte Fritzson 12
Teologiska rummet 32
Filosofiska rummet 127
Vetenskapsradion Historia 176
Snedtänkt (Kalle Lind) 239
Les Crises 3229
Richard Falk 191
Ian Sinclair 119
SpinWatch 61
Counter Currents 10876
Kafila 555
Gail Malone 42
Transnational Foundation 221
Rick Falkvinge 95
The Duran 10440
Vanessa Beeley 174
Nina Kouprianova 9
MintPress 5808
Paul Craig Roberts 2179
News Junkie Post 59
Nomi Prins 27
Kurt Nimmo 191
Strategic Culture 5507
Sir Ken Robinson 25
Stephan Kinsella 107
Liberty Blitzkrieg 870
Sami Bedouin 65
Consortium News 2685
21 Century Wire 3837
Burning Blogger 324
Stephen Gowans 97
David D. Friedman 157
Anarchist Standard 16
The BRICS Post 1529
Tom Dispatch 574
Levant Report 18
The Saker 4757
The Barnes Review 556
John Friend 509
Psyche Truth 160
Jonathan Cook 162
New Eastern Outlook 4508
School Sucks Project 1789
Giza Death Star 2042
Andrew Gavin Marshall 15
Red Ice Radio 642
GMWatch 2466
Robert Faurisson 150
Espionage History Archive 35
Jay's Analysis 1082
Le 4ème singe 90
Jacob Cohen 214
Agora Vox 17563
Cercle Des Volontaires 445
Panamza 2374
Fairewinds 118
Project Censored 1069
Spy Culture 591
Conspiracy Archive 81
Crystal Clark 11
Timothy Kelly 607
PINAC 1482
The Conscious Resistance 924
Independent Science News 83
The Anti Media 6848
Positive News 820
Brandon Martinez 30
Steven Chovanec 61
Lionel 305
The Mind renewed 452
Natural Society 2621
Yanis Varoufakis 1054
Tragedy & Hope 122
Dr. Tim Ball 114
Web of Debt 158
Porkins Policy Review 446
Conspiracy Watch 174
Eva Bartlett 626
Libyan War Truth 352
DeadLine Live 1916
Kevin Ryan 64
BSNEWS 2101
Aaron Franz 253
Traces of Reality 166
Revelations Radio News 121
Dr. Bruce Levine 153
Peter B Collins 1685
Faux Capitalism 205
Dissident Voice 11362
Climate Audit 226
Donna Laframboise 478
Judith Curry 1160
Geneva Business Insider 40
Media Monarchy 2556
Syria Report 78
Human Rights Investigation 93
Intifada (Voice of Palestine) 1685
Down With Tyranny 12803
Laura Wells Solutions 46
Video Rebel's Blog 452
Revisionist Review 485
Aletho News 21795
ضد العولمة 27
Penny for your thoughts 3188
Northerntruthseeker 2582
كساريات 37
Color Revolutions and Geopolitics 27
Stop Nato 4803
AntiWar.com Blog 3286
AntiWar.com Original Content 7338
Corbett Report 2509
Stop Imperialism 491
Land Destroyer 1252
Webster Tarpley Website 1137

Compiled Feeds

Public Lists

Title Visibility
Funny Public