Visit ArabTopics.com

Suicide, Ketamine, the Propaganda Model and the New York Times

At the time, toward the end of 2018, it didn’t seem completely irrational to submit an op-ed to the New York Times. I had felt compelled to respond to a lengthy NYT op-ed “Can We Stop Suicides?” authored by Moises Velasquez-Manoff, who had offered what I considered to be a fairly insane solution: “an old anesthetic called ketamine that, at low doses, can halt suicidal thoughts almost immediately.”

I knew that Janssen/Johnson &Johnson was attempting to get their esketamine—a ketamine based nasal spray—approved by the FDA to be used as an antidepressant, and I recognized how much power the psychiatric-pharmaceutical industrial complex has over the NYT. But I had thought, geez, this is ketamine—“Special K,” which at high doses can result in a “K-Hole,” an out-of-body experience; which has been utilized as a date-rape drug and is officially classified as a “dissociative anesthetic” with adverse effects that include numbness, depression, amnesia, hallucinations, and potentially fatal respiratory problems.

Ordinarily, I am hopeless about the NYT publishing anything that honestly examines a proposed psychiatric drug in the context of the history of psychiatric drugs, but this was Special K, the notorious street drug! What further energized me to submit an op-ed was that I believed that Velasquez-Manoff’s NYT piece might be considered “radical” even by some NYT editors since (1) there is no data—not even the usual drug company pseudoscientific data—on ketamine’s long-term effects and potential risks, and (2) ketamine has not even been approved by the FDA for depression.

However, I hesitated to submit the op-ed. I’ve long known that the NYT and the mainstream media has “filters” that they use in their publishing decision, some of them detailed by Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky in in their book Manufacturing Consent. Two filters that Herman and Chomsky describe in their “Propaganda Model” that are most relevant to the psychiatric-pharmaceutical industrial complex are: “advertising as the primary income source of the mass media”; and mainstream media’s reliance “on information provided by government, business, and ‘experts’ funded and approved by these primary sources and agents of power.”

It is simply bad business for the NYT to offend their many readers who are utilizing psychiatric drugs for themselves or their children—readers who have religiously bought into psychiatry as a legitimate authority; and it is even worse business for the NYT to offend their drug company advertisers. Thus, there is little incentive for the NYT to challenge “official authorities” who are promulgating propaganda posing as science.  In 2008, when the NYT must have had—or should have had—sources telling them about the massive amount of drug company money being funneled to thought-leader psychiatrists such as Charles Nemeroff, Joseph Biederman, and several others, the NYT reported on this only after Congressional investigations exposed it, which gave the NYT “cover” to do so. While the NYT and the mainstream media, at times, does investigative journalism, it’s always filtered by the political and profit-making ramifications for the NYT.

The NYT proudly calls their filtering process “all the news that’s fit to print.” Journalists who are “fit” for the NYT internalize these filters, and so they genuinely believe that they are, as Herman and Chomsky observed, “operating with complete integrity and goodwill . . . able to convince themselves that they choose and interpret the news ‘objectively’ and on the basis of professional news values.” The reality is that rather than functioning as actual journalists—who should be skeptical of the motives of “official authorities”—it is politically and financially safer to simply report what official authorities assert.

There were a couple of other rationales for why I gave the NYT op-ed a shot which, in retrospect, were more based on my hope than reality. In 2014, the NYT had actually asked me to write a piece for them, which they had actually published, so I thought they might take my submission seriously; however, my 2014 published NYT opinion piece was not about the mental health profession (but a response to their “Room for Debate” question: “Why We Like to Watch Rich People”). My silliest rationale (which I even knew at the time was silly) was that I thought that maybe 2018 was my lucky year with op-eds, as I had two op-eds published in the only daily newspaper in my city, the Cincinnati Enquirer; but here again, neither one of these op-eds were about the mental health profession (the most recent one, Another Sad October for Reds Fans, slammed our losing baseball team’s management, an op-ed which actually made me quite popular in Cincinnati).

In retrospect, it now seems quite humorous to me that I had believed that there was any chance that the NYT would run my response, but when I wrote it, I mostly focused on overcoming this major hurdle: the bland New York Times style. My favorite story about NYT style comes from Paul Zimmerman, a legendary New York City sportswriter. Zimmerman had been asked by the NYT to write a book review for them, and after he noticed that a couple of passages in the book that he was assigned to review had been plagiarized from his own book, he wrote in his review: “What a bad break, lifting from a guy who happens to be reviewing your book. Tough luck. Just ain’t your day, kid.” After Zimmerman submitted his review, the NYT book review editor responded, “Well, your review is kind of rough. Can you bland it down a little?” Zimmerman refused, and his review never ran, and the NYT never again asked him to write another piece.

It was so important for me to get my response published that I even tried to bland it down so as to fit NYT style. Then I followed all the rules of the NYT “How to Submit an Op-Ed Essay,’ and I sent it off. But my hopes were dashed immediately. I received an automatic response that proclaimed another rule, one that had not been stated in the submission rules: “We discourage essays that are primarily responses to other opinion articles, columns or editorials in The Times.”

So, I chuckled about my NYT op-ed publication delusion, put color back in the piece, changed the title, added a snarky crack about the NYT in the first paragraph, and submitted it to another publication—the muckraking CounterPunch, whose readers know what the NYT is all about. You can read the piece by clicking The Ketamine Chorus: NYT Trumpets New Anti-Suicide Drug.

 

Source: 
Dr. Bruce Levine

Dear friends of this aggregator

  • Yes, I intentionally removed Newsbud from the aggregator on Mar 22.
  • Newsbud did not block the aggregator, although their editor blocked me on twitter after a comment I made to her
  • As far as I know, the only site that blocks this aggregator is Global Research. I have no idea why!!
  • Please stop recommending Newsbud and Global Research to be added to the aggregator.

Support this site

News Sources

Source Items
WWI Hidden History 51
Grayzone Project 245
Pass Blue 256
Dilyana Gaytandzhieva 16
John Pilger 418
The Real News 367
Scrutinised Minds 29
Need To Know News 2810
FEE 4919
Marine Le Pen 391
Francois Asselineau 25
Opassande 53
HAX on 5July 220
Henrik Alexandersson 1020
Mohamed Omar 392
Professors Blog 10
Arg Blatte Talar 40
Angry Foreigner 18
Fritte Fritzson 12
Teologiska rummet 32
Filosofiska rummet 118
Vetenskapsradion Historia 166
Snedtänkt (Kalle Lind) 230
Les Crises 3051
Richard Falk 181
Ian Sinclair 115
SpinWatch 61
Counter Currents 10324
Kafila 511
Gail Malone 42
Transnational Foundation 221
Rick Falkvinge 95
The Duran 10124
Vanessa Beeley 152
Nina Kouprianova 9
MintPress 5704
Paul Craig Roberts 2037
News Junkie Post 58
Nomi Prins 27
Kurt Nimmo 191
Strategic Culture 5211
Sir Ken Robinson 25
Stephan Kinsella 103
Liberty Blitzkrieg 863
Sami Bedouin 65
Consortium News 2685
21 Century Wire 3721
Burning Blogger 324
Stephen Gowans 94
David D. Friedman 154
Anarchist Standard 16
The BRICS Post 1523
Tom Dispatch 555
Levant Report 18
The Saker 4541
The Barnes Review 541
John Friend 499
Psyche Truth 160
Jonathan Cook 162
New Eastern Outlook 4312
School Sucks Project 1784
Giza Death Star 2000
Andrew Gavin Marshall 15
Red Ice Radio 628
GMWatch 2409
Robert Faurisson 150
Espionage History Archive 34
Jay's Analysis 1038
Le 4ème singe 90
Jacob Cohen 213
Agora Vox 16727
Cercle Des Volontaires 440
Panamza 2294
Fairewinds 117
Project Censored 1010
Spy Culture 567
Conspiracy Archive 78
Crystal Clark 11
Timothy Kelly 590
PINAC 1482
The Conscious Resistance 876
Independent Science News 83
The Anti Media 6768
Positive News 820
Brandon Martinez 30
Steven Chovanec 61
Lionel 300
The Mind renewed 447
Natural Society 2621
Yanis Varoufakis 1039
Tragedy & Hope 122
Dr. Tim Ball 114
Web of Debt 150
Porkins Policy Review 439
Conspiracy Watch 174
Eva Bartlett 621
Libyan War Truth 341
DeadLine Live 1914
Kevin Ryan 64
BSNEWS 2089
Aaron Franz 247
Traces of Reality 166
Revelations Radio News 121
Dr. Bruce Levine 151
Peter B Collins 1644
Faux Capitalism 205
Dissident Voice 11139
Climate Audit 226
Donna Laframboise 462
Judith Curry 1146
Geneva Business Insider 40
Media Monarchy 2488
Syria Report 78
Human Rights Investigation 93
Intifada (Voice of Palestine) 1685
Down With Tyranny 12442
Laura Wells Solutions 45
Video Rebel's Blog 444
Revisionist Review 485
Aletho News 21263
ضد العولمة 27
Penny for your thoughts 3118
Northerntruthseeker 2496
كساريات 37
Color Revolutions and Geopolitics 27
Stop Nato 4742
AntiWar.com Blog 3187
AntiWar.com Original Content 7186
Corbett Report 2448
Stop Imperialism 491
Land Destroyer 1237
Webster Tarpley Website 1119

Compiled Feeds

Public Lists

Title Visibility
Funny Public