Should Jeremy Corbyn commit to a second referendum? The Independent

Should Jeremy Corbyn adopt an unequivocal commitment to holding a second referendum? Under normal circumstances, it should be an easy question to answer: democrats who think of referendums as a useful injection of direct democracy into our system of representative government, should be in favour. And those who are sceptical of referendums should be against.

Alas, our circumstances have stopped being “normal” from the moment Leave won the June 2016 referendum.

The strongest evidence that we live in abnormal times is the curious observation that many who lambasted David Cameron for holding the first referendum, and who are generally inimical to the use of referendums in representative democracies, now support a people’s vote to reverse the first one. To complete the paradox, many who are, in general, in favour of referendums today oppose a second vote.

In the interests of full disclosure, I am an enthusiastic supporter of people’s direct votes as long as they are embedded fully into representative democracy, as in Switzerland.

It is a model that has served progressive causes well at many levels. For instance, it is standard practice in labour disputes that, once trade union leaders strike a deal with employers, they put it to their members. European progressives who opposed the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, Greece’s “bailouts” etc, have always demanded that negotiated international treaties should be put to plebiscites.

From this perspective, under normal circumstances, it would make perfect sense to demand that Jeremy Corbyn commits to a people’s confirmatory vote. The reason why our circumstances are anything but normal, and our political climate so poisoned, is the ticking countdown clock, and the deadline effect that comes attached to Article 50 of the EU’s Lisbon Treaty.

But, if they fail to agree by the end of the two years, the company closes down immediately, damaging both sides (though not symmetrically). Finally, the employer side is allowed, unilaterally, to approve extensions of the two-year period, but only via another fixed deadline.

What would happen under such conditions? When the negotiation endpoint is fixed exogenously (eg by the law), both negotiating sides have a powerful incentive to leave their last concession for that last moment. And when one of the two sides has the monopoly of the right to extend the negotiation, bargaining power tilts in its favour massively.

In such a world, the employers know that the trade union membership’s right to vote on the final offer is irrelevant. Indeed, it would be in their interest to insist on a terrible deal so as to put those members in a bind: “Accept a deal that is awful by design, vote the deal down at the price of retrenchment, or seek an extension during which to reconsider the wisdom of having mandated your leaders to negotiate with us better terms and conditions.”

In short, the effect of the Article 50 deadline was designed to leave no room for a meaningful confirmatory vote, and to railroad a hapless prime minister into a humiliating defeat. While it is technically possible to hold a Final Say referendum before October, when the Article 50 process expires, the result will seem illegitimate in the eyes of a large minority if a fresh referendum is not preceded by a genuine people’s debate.

Whichever side wins, one thing is for certain: it will be the last such referendum we see in the UK for a century. Those of us who think that democracy is an end in itself should be terrified by the idea of a second referendum that becomes the tombstone of all future people’s votes.

But the question remains: should Jeremy Corbyn commit to a second referendum? I think he should. On one condition: that Article 50’s ticking clock has been removed and the all-important people’s debate is given the time and space it needs to unfold. What would that mean in practice? It depends on the situation a future Labour government inherits from the Tories’ calamitous reign.

A Corbyn government forming after a Tory Brexit should immediately kickstart a people’s grand debate on the UK’s business model, internal constitution (eg the Northern Ireland question, and the creation of one or more English assemblies) and, of course, the UK-EU relationship. The new referendum to follow would include the option of the UK rejoining the EU, staying within a Norway-plus arrangement, or going it alone.

And if the new Labour government is elected while Article 50 is still ticking away, it should pave the ground for the same democratic process, either by revoking Article 50 for as long as it is necessary or after first concluding a customs union-based withdrawal agreement. A Corbyn-led Labour Party has the power to rise above the new sectarianism and create the circumstances where people’s votes actually count.

Yanis Varoufakis

Dear friends of this aggregator

  • Yes, I intentionally removed Newsbud from the aggregator on Mar 22.
  • Newsbud did not block the aggregator, although their editor blocked me on twitter after a comment I made to her
  • As far as I know, the only site that blocks this aggregator is Global Research. I have no idea why!!
  • Please stop recommending Newsbud and Global Research to be added to the aggregator.

Support this site

News Sources

Source Items
WWI Hidden History 50
Grayzone Project 160
Pass Blue 204
Dilyana Gaytandzhieva 14
John Pilger 416
The Real News 367
Scrutinised Minds 29
Need To Know News 2560
FEE 4554
Marine Le Pen 378
Francois Asselineau 25
Opassande 53
HAX on 5July 220
Henrik Alexandersson 900
Mohamed Omar 370
Professors Blog 10
Arg Blatte Talar 40
Angry Foreigner 18
Fritte Fritzson 12
Teologiska rummet 32
Filosofiska rummet 106
Vetenskapsradion Historia 152
Snedtänkt (Kalle Lind) 216
Les Crises 2781
Richard Falk 165
Ian Sinclair 106
SpinWatch 61
Counter Currents 9397
Kafila 469
Gail Malone 38
Transnational Foundation 221
Rick Falkvinge 95
The Duran 9694
Vanessa Beeley 120
Nina Kouprianova 9
MintPress 5625
Paul Craig Roberts 1802
News Junkie Post 58
Nomi Prins 27
Kurt Nimmo 191
Strategic Culture 4730
Sir Ken Robinson 24
Stephan Kinsella 97
Liberty Blitzkrieg 850
Sami Bedouin 64
Consortium News 2661
21 Century Wire 3522
Burning Blogger 324
Stephen Gowans 88
David D. Friedman 152
Anarchist Standard 16
The BRICS Post 1512
Tom Dispatch 522
Levant Report 18
The Saker 4293
The Barnes Review 526
John Friend 469
Psyche Truth 158
Jonathan Cook 145
New Eastern Outlook 3952
School Sucks Project 1775
Giza Death Star 1908
Andrew Gavin Marshall 15
Red Ice Radio 612
GMWatch 2291
Robert Faurisson 150
Espionage History Archive 34
Jay's Analysis 958
Le 4ème singe 90
Jacob Cohen 207
Agora Vox 15412
Cercle Des Volontaires 436
Panamza 2178
Fairewinds 117
Project Censored 944
Spy Culture 525
Conspiracy Archive 76
Crystal Clark 11
Timothy Kelly 566
PINAC 1482
The Conscious Resistance 833
Independent Science News 80
The Anti Media 6656
Positive News 820
Brandon Martinez 30
Steven Chovanec 61
Lionel 292
The Mind renewed 441
Natural Society 2619
Yanis Varoufakis 999
Tragedy & Hope 122
Dr. Tim Ball 114
Web of Debt 145
Porkins Policy Review 421
Conspiracy Watch 174
Eva Bartlett 596
Libyan War Truth 335
DeadLine Live 1913
Kevin Ryan 63
Aaron Franz 232
Traces of Reality 166
Revelations Radio News 121
Dr. Bruce Levine 145
Peter B Collins 1560
Faux Capitalism 205
Dissident Voice 10742
Climate Audit 224
Donna Laframboise 436
Judith Curry 1129
Geneva Business Insider 40
Media Monarchy 2382
Syria Report 78
Human Rights Investigation 91
Intifada (Voice of Palestine) 1685
Down With Tyranny 11868
Laura Wells Solutions 44
Video Rebel's Blog 435
Revisionist Review 485
Aletho News 20403
ضد العولمة 27
Penny for your thoughts 3005
Northerntruthseeker 2375
كساريات 37
Color Revolutions and Geopolitics 27
Stop Nato 4711 Blog 3066 Original Content 6932
Corbett Report 2356
Stop Imperialism 491
Land Destroyer 1197
Webster Tarpley Website 1102

Compiled Feeds

Public Lists

Title Visibility
Funny Public