Visit ArabTopics.com

With Pompeo Visit, US Seeks New Justification for Ongoing Presence in Afghanistan

KABUL – During an unannounced visit to Afghanistan on Monday, a brief speech by Mike Pompeo betrayed what appears to be a major shift in U.S. policy towards the war in Afghanistan, the longest war in American history. Though the U.S. press widely reported that the purpose of Pompeo’s visit was to promote “peace talks” between the U.S.-backed government of Afghan President Ashraf Ghani and the Taliban insurgency, Pompeo’s own remarks suggest that the promotion of such talks instead disguise the Trump administration’s new approach to Afghanistan, one which is set to formalize the U.S.’ nearly two-decades-long occupation of the country.

Indeed, in contrast to decades of official rhetoric from Washington asserting that the purpose of the U.S. presence in the country was “defeating the Taliban”, Pompeo’s speech in the Afghan capital of Kabul was strangely optimistic given the reality on the ground. For instance, Pompeo asserted that “progress” had been made in the conflict as “many of the Taliban now see that they can’t win on the ground militarily,” adding that the Taliban were “beginning to see that they cannot wait us out.”

However, there is every indication that the conflict has actually worsened in recent months, with Daesh (ISIS) and Taliban forces launching major attacks in ostensibly “secure” areas, a jump in “insider” attacks on U.S. troops and continued Taliban control of more than half of the country. Furthermore, the Taliban remain as defiant as ever, a defiance likely fueled by anger over the massive spike in civilian casualties resulting from the Trump’s “new rules of engagement” for the U.S. military in Afghanistan.

In addition, the U.S. is well aware that the Taliban do not actually believe that “waiting out” the U.S. is futile, particularly given the fact that the U.S.-backed Afghan government has stated that its military would fold to the Taliban within 6 months if the U.S. were to withdraw troops and military aid, which accounts for 90% of Afghanistan’s defense budget.

Notably, Pompeo’s unrealistically optimistic assessment of the conflict was followed by a comment that the U.S. “now more than ever […] stands as an enduring partner for Afghanistan.” The shift of the U.S. role in Afghanistan from “defeating the Taliban” to “enduring partner” is significant as it signals the U.S.’ continued presence in the country will continue in the years to come.

Indeed, the U.S.’ previously stated goal of “defeating the Taliban” suggested that, if and when the Taliban insurgency could be controlled or mitigated, the U.S. and NATO would remove thier troops and turn control over to the Kabul-based government. However, the U.S.’ new goal of acting as an “enduring partner” instead lays the foundation for an indefinite U.S.’ presence in the country as an occupying power, regardless of the status of the Taliban insurgency.

 

US push for foreign military presence makes peace impossible

Further proof that the Trump administration has no legitimate plans for peace talks in Afghanistan are apparent in the fact that the talks, promoted by Pompeo, are doomed to fail. This is clear given the Taliban’s long-standing refusal to negotiate with the U.S.-backed Afghan government – which it dismisses as “mere American puppets” – in favor of negotiating with the U.S. directly. In addition, the Taliban has long made it clear that their key demand in any peace talks would be a complete withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan, which currently number around 14,000.

Pompeo’s recent speech made it clear that the peace talks he promoted on Monday would be “Afghan-led and Afghan-owned” with promises that U.S. participation would only be in a supportive role. As a result, the Taliban rejected and “shrugged off” the talks Pompeo was pushing – an eventuality that Pompeo must have known would occur given the group’s very clear previous demands for direct talks with the U.S. and not with the U.S.-backed Afghan government.

Another indication that the Trump administration is not interested in “peace” with the Taliban, and instead plans to deepen and formalize its occupation, is the fact that the U.S.’ new commander of forces in Afghanistan has stated that the U.S. will not withdraw its troops anytime soon. Appointed to the position of commander less than two weeks ago, Army General Austin Scott Miller – the 17th commander to oversee the U.S./NATO occupation of Afghanistan – told the Senate Armed Services Committee in a hearing last month that the continued military occupation was in “the vital interests of [U.S.] national security]” and that he would continue the same military strategy practiced by his predecessors – i.e. the indefinite continuation of the occupation.

Furthermore, in addition to indications that the U.S. military presence in Afghanistan will be ongoing, this week the U.S. pushed its allies to greatly increase their military presence in the country and has even pushed other countries to join the occupation. Just one day after Pompeo’s visit, the U.K. announced that it would double its troop presence in Afghanistan at the Trump administration’s request in order to help address the country’s “fragile security situation.”

Mike Pompeo speaks with UAE Foreign Minister Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan in Abu Dhabi‎ ahead of Pompeo's visit to Afghanistan, July 10, 2018. Andrew Harnik | AP

Mike Pompeo speaks with UAE Foreign Minister Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan in Abu Dhabi‎ ahead of Pompeo’s visit to Afghanistan, July 10, 2018. Andrew Harnik | AP

The Trump administration has also just convinced two of its Middle Eastern allies – Qatar and the United Arab Emirates – to join the foreign occupation of Afghanistan. The inclusion of the two countries, both of whom have funded the Taliban in the past, will be formally approved during a NATO meeting next week.

In addition, another U.S. Middle Eastern ally with connections to the Taliban, Saudi Arabia, hosted a conference of Afghan religious scholars on Wednesday in an effort to use its influence as the fountainhead of extremist Wahhabi Islam to declare Taliban resistance to the U.S. occupation as contrary to Islam. The Taliban has already dismissed the findings of the Saudi-hosted conference.

 

Pompeo-promoted “peace” distracts from Russian, Chinese efforts to target ISIS in Afghanistan

Beyond indications from the U.S. that its military presence in Afghanistan is set to continue for some time, other international efforts aimed at brokering peace in the country were deliberately sabotaged by the Trump administration just last year. Those efforts, led by Russia, China and Pakistan were scuttle by the Trump administration’s decision to increase the presence of U.S. troops during the talks and Trump’s tanking of U.S.-Pakistani relations, specifically over Pakistan’s role in Afghanistan and Pakistan’s cooperation with the U.S.’ rival states (Russia and China).

Interestingly, those same powers are again meeting in Pakistan this week to discuss the same issue, this time joined by Iran. Sergei Ivanov, the chief of the press bureau of the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service, told TASS news agency this week that the heads of those countries’ intelligence services were meeting to discuss “the dangers arising from a buildup of Daesh on the Afghan territory,” a threat which has grown as the Daesh presence in Syria and Iraq has been greatly reduced. The U.S., however, has made no mention of these talks despite their ostensible interest in targeting Daesh’s presence in Afghanistan. Instead, reports have surfaced suggesting that the U.S. is actively allowing Daesh to infiltrate and grow in Afghanistan as a means of creating instability along the Afghan-Iranian border in order to aid the U.S.’ policy of “turning up the heat” on Iran’s government.

Given the past scuttling of peace efforts led by other nations as well U.S. efforts to greatly increase the presence of foreign troops in the country, Pompeo’s recent “peace promoting” visit can only be considered a publicity stunt meant to disguise the formalization of the U.S. occupation as a promotion of “Afghan-led” peace efforts which are clearly doomed to fail.

Top Photo | Secretary of State Mike Pompeo meets with coalition forces at Bagram Air Base, Afghanistan, July 9, 2018. Andrew Harnik | AP

Whitney Webb is a staff writer for MintPress News and a contributor to Ben Swann’s Truth in Media. Her work has appeared on Global Research, the Ron Paul Institute and 21st Century Wire, among others. She has also made radio and TV appearances on RT and Sputnik. She currently lives with her family in southern Chile.

The post With Pompeo Visit, US Seeks New Justification for Ongoing Presence in Afghanistan appeared first on MintPress News.

Source: 
MintPress

Dear friends of this aggregator

  • Yes, I intentionally removed Newsbud from the aggregator on Mar 22.
  • Newsbud did not block the aggregator, although their editor blocked me on twitter after a comment I made to her
  • As far as I know, the only site that blocks this aggregator is Global Research. I have no idea why!!
  • Please stop recommending Newsbud and Global Research to be added to the aggregator.

Support this site

News Sources

Source Items
Grayzone Project 17
Pass Blue 71
Dilyana Gaytandzhieva 14
John Pilger 410
The Real News 367
Scrutinised Minds 29
Need To Know News 1758
FEE 3375
Marine Le Pen 236
Francois Asselineau 25
Opassande 53
HAX on 5July 220
Henrik Alexandersson 574
Mohamed Omar 251
Professors Blog 10
Arg Blatte Talar 37
Angry Foreigner 17
Fritte Fritzson 11
Teologiska rummet 32
Filosofiska rummet 74
Vetenskapsradion Historia 120
Snedtänkt (Kalle Lind) 180
Les Crises 1963
Richard Falk 118
Ian Sinclair 80
SpinWatch 52
Counter Currents 6574
Kafila 365
Gail Malone 34
Transnational Foundation 221
Rick Falkvinge 93
The Duran 6669
Vanessa Beeley 93
Nina Kouprianova 9
MintPress 4898
Paul Craig Roberts 1197
News Junkie Post 47
Nomi Prins 24
Kurt Nimmo 191
Strategic Culture 3602
Sir Ken Robinson 16
Stephan Kinsella 67
Liberty Blitzkrieg 799
Sami Bedouin 61
Consortium News 2176
21 Century Wire 2976
Burning Blogger 284
Stephen Gowans 67
David D. Friedman 133
Anarchist Standard 16
The BRICS Post 1468
Tom Dispatch 420
Levant Report 17
The Saker 3506
The Barnes Review 477
John Friend 368
Psyche Truth 146
Jonathan Cook 135
New Eastern Outlook 3182
School Sucks Project 1738
Giza Death Star 1589
Andrew Gavin Marshall 15
Red Ice Radio 571
GMWatch 1855
Robert Faurisson 149
Espionage History Archive 34
Jay's Analysis 763
Le 4ème singe 87
Jacob Cohen 200
Agora Vox 11162
Cercle Des Volontaires 417
Panamza 1694
Fairewinds 103
Project Censored 723
Spy Culture 383
Conspiracy Archive 67
Crystal Clark 11
Timothy Kelly 495
PINAC 1482
The Conscious Resistance 570
Independent Science News 66
The Anti Media 5666
Positive News 820
Brandon Martinez 30
Steven Chovanec 61
Lionel 259
The Mind renewed 213
Natural Society 2475
Yanis Varoufakis 822
Tragedy & Hope 122
Dr. Tim Ball 65
Web of Debt 129
Porkins Policy Review 353
Conspiracy Watch 174
Eva Bartlett 563
Libyan War Truth 280
DeadLine Live 1905
Kevin Ryan 61
BSNEWS 1978
Aaron Franz 191
Traces of Reality 166
Revelations Radio News 121
Dr. Bruce Levine 115
Peter B Collins 1358
Faux Capitalism 205
Dissident Voice 9636
Climate Audit 221
Donna Laframboise 362
Judith Curry 1056
Geneva Business Insider 40
Media Monarchy 2016
Syria Report 70
Human Rights Investigation 90
Intifada (Voice of Palestine) 1685
Down With Tyranny 10253
Laura Wells Solutions 28
Video Rebel's Blog 412
Revisionist Review 485
Aletho News 18011
ضد العولمة 27
Penny for your thoughts 2683
Northerntruthseeker 2068
كساريات 37
Color Revolutions and Geopolitics 27
Stop Nato 4624
AntiWar.com Blog 2713
AntiWar.com Original Content 6176
Corbett Report 2098
Stop Imperialism 491
Land Destroyer 1111
Webster Tarpley Website 957

Compiled Feeds

Public Lists

Title Visibility
Funny Public