On Political Issues Raised by the Latest Tokyo African Development Forum


With the existing fabric of international relations unravelling, one area of activity is attracting more and more attention; the leading nations are jostling each other for influence in what they see as the most interesting regions.

And increasingly, one of the most important regions is the vast continent of Africa, rich in a wide range of natural resources, and which forms the “western boundary” of the Indo-Pacific region, currently the main focus of geopolitical maneuvering between the great world powers. As a result, the control of that boundary is of great strategic as well as economic importance.

That strategic importance helps to explain why the leading world powers are competing with each other for a “piece” of the African continent. But if they were able to coordinate their efforts then a lot more progress could be made in solving the key problems that beset most of the countries on the continent. Problems like economic fatigue, poor transport infrastructure, vulnerability to epidemics, an underdeveloped education system and the resulting lack of opportunities for young people, and various forms of political or religious extremism including international terrorist organizations.

But far from cooperating, those leading world powers are actively working against each other. Their failure to work together is an obstacle to progress in solving Africa’s problems, and, what is more, it is causing them to view each other with a great deal of suspicion.

Those two points were highlighted by the Chinese newspaper the Global Times, in an article on the 7th Tokyo International Conference on African Development (TICAD VII) which took place in Yokohama and ended on August 30.

47 African countries officially took part in TICAD VII. Of those, 42 sent delegations headed by senior officials. The 4500 delegates included representatives of state bodies from the participating nations, as well as private companies and a range of international organizations.

It should be noted that at present TICAD is, for Japan, the most important bilateral forum for promoting its interests in a continent that is full of opportunities. Three years ago, at the time of the previous conference (TICAD VI), held in the Kenyan capital Nairobi, we briefly reviewed the forum’s history and its main areas of focus.

The document issued at the end of TICAD VII generally reaffirmed those areas of focus and the specific proposals set out in the Declarations accepted in the 2013 Conference, also held in Yokohama, and the 2016 Conference, held in Nairobi.

But the Declaration issued in 2019 included a new and very striking political innovation which immediately attracted a great deal of attention from political observers. The Declaration recorded a resolution passed by the conference delegates to uphold the principles of the Free and Open Indo-Pacific Initiative. This phrase, which is absolutely innocuous, and even positive in nature – no-one has any objections to its wording – needs a little explanation.

Towards the end of 2011, when, under Barak Obama and Hilary Clinton, US foreign policy changed course, the so-called “turn towards Asia”, China was identified as the main threat to US national interests. As for the nature of those threats, they were associated with the idea that China could upset the “freedom and openness” of the region. And, in order to demonstrate that this threat was not just a figment of its imagination, the US cited the complex situation in South China Sea, where there are a number of territorial disputes between China and its neighbors over a number of archipelagoes and individual islands.

That phrase (“a free and open Indo-Pacific”) has turned into a kind of meme, or mantra, which US allies tend to repeat or make references to, directly or indirectly, when participating in any international forum dealing with the region.

As for the Japanese government’s interpretation of that mantra, it was set out by Shinzo Abe, the Japanese Prime Minister, in his speech before TICAD VI, in 2016. But, we repeat, it was not until August 2019, at the end of TICAD VII, that the phrase made its appearance in the text of the final Declaration.

The present author does not, by any means, believe that the Declaration’s African signatories are aware of or agree with the document’s anti-Chinese subtext put in it by China’s “well-wishers”. After all, China is now the uncontested leader in the development of wide-ranging relations with African countries and it is more involved in the continent’s economy than Japan is.

That is clearly demonstrated by the comparative data on a range of different indicators published by the Japanese newspapers Yomiuri Shimbun and Mainichi Shimbun during TICAD VII. Japan allocated $20 billion for investment in Africa between 2016 and 2018 (from private sources of finance), and has allocated the same amount for the next three years, while China has allocated $60 billion (primarily from the state budget), also over a 3-year period, but in China’s case the period of 3 years started in 2018. The number of companies from the two countries doing business in Africa is as follows: Japan – 800, China – 10,000 The two countries’ exports to African countries: Japan – $8.1 billion, China – $105.3 billion

In other words, it is clear that there is no reason why the African nations in question should want to “spit in the well from which they draw water” and insult China by signing an official document. Each person is free to interpret the (completely innocuous, as we have already said) document as they wish, but their interpretation may reveal more about that person’s own cynicism than it does about the document itself.

It is worth noting that, since 2000, China has held its own competing forum, the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC), which is no less prestigious than TICAD. The most recent FOCAC, held in Beijing on September 3-4, 2018, was jointly led by Xi Jinping, the Chinese President, and his South African counterpart Cyril Ramaphosa.

In conclusion, the author would once again like to express his regret that, in the important matter of working together to promote the wide-ranging social and economic development of the African nations, the two leading Asian powers have chosen to follow entirely separate parallel paths and as a result view each other with suspicion. That suspicion is completely unwarranted, given the marked improvement in relations between China and Japan over the last two years.

Vladimir Terekhov, expert on the issues of the Asia-Pacific region, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.

New Eastern Outlook

Dear friends of this aggregator

  • Yes, I intentionally removed Newsbud from the aggregator on Mar 22.
  • Newsbud did not block the aggregator, although their editor blocked me on twitter after a comment I made to her
  • As far as I know, the only site that blocks this aggregator is Global Research. I have no idea why!!
  • Please stop recommending Newsbud and Global Research to be added to the aggregator.

Support this site

News Sources

Source Items
WWI Hidden History 51
Grayzone Project 191
Pass Blue 218
Dilyana Gaytandzhieva 14
John Pilger 416
The Real News 367
Scrutinised Minds 29
Need To Know News 2647
FEE 4703
Marine Le Pen 380
Francois Asselineau 25
Opassande 53
HAX on 5July 220
Henrik Alexandersson 939
Mohamed Omar 375
Professors Blog 10
Arg Blatte Talar 40
Angry Foreigner 18
Fritte Fritzson 12
Teologiska rummet 32
Filosofiska rummet 109
Vetenskapsradion Historia 157
Snedtänkt (Kalle Lind) 220
Les Crises 2853
Richard Falk 167
Ian Sinclair 111
SpinWatch 61
Counter Currents 9697
Kafila 492
Gail Malone 41
Transnational Foundation 221
Rick Falkvinge 95
The Duran 9822
Vanessa Beeley 131
Nina Kouprianova 9
MintPress 5647
Paul Craig Roberts 1869
News Junkie Post 58
Nomi Prins 27
Kurt Nimmo 191
Strategic Culture 4878
Sir Ken Robinson 25
Stephan Kinsella 99
Liberty Blitzkrieg 854
Sami Bedouin 64
Consortium News 2685
21 Century Wire 3602
Burning Blogger 324
Stephen Gowans 90
David D. Friedman 152
Anarchist Standard 16
The BRICS Post 1518
Tom Dispatch 529
Levant Report 18
The Saker 4365
The Barnes Review 530
John Friend 481
Psyche Truth 160
Jonathan Cook 145
New Eastern Outlook 4062
School Sucks Project 1779
Giza Death Star 1941
Andrew Gavin Marshall 15
Red Ice Radio 617
GMWatch 2332
Robert Faurisson 150
Espionage History Archive 34
Jay's Analysis 989
Le 4ème singe 90
Jacob Cohen 210
Agora Vox 15768
Cercle Des Volontaires 436
Panamza 2202
Fairewinds 117
Project Censored 952
Spy Culture 540
Conspiracy Archive 76
Crystal Clark 11
Timothy Kelly 575
PINAC 1482
The Conscious Resistance 851
Independent Science News 80
The Anti Media 6690
Positive News 820
Brandon Martinez 30
Steven Chovanec 61
Lionel 296
The Mind renewed 443
Natural Society 2619
Yanis Varoufakis 1007
Tragedy & Hope 122
Dr. Tim Ball 114
Web of Debt 146
Porkins Policy Review 428
Conspiracy Watch 174
Eva Bartlett 602
Libyan War Truth 337
DeadLine Live 1913
Kevin Ryan 64
Aaron Franz 238
Traces of Reality 166
Revelations Radio News 121
Dr. Bruce Levine 147
Peter B Collins 1586
Faux Capitalism 205
Dissident Voice 10865
Climate Audit 224
Donna Laframboise 445
Judith Curry 1136
Geneva Business Insider 40
Media Monarchy 2419
Syria Report 78
Human Rights Investigation 93
Intifada (Voice of Palestine) 1685
Down With Tyranny 12056
Laura Wells Solutions 44
Video Rebel's Blog 438
Revisionist Review 485
Aletho News 20712
ضد العولمة 27
Penny for your thoughts 3042
Northerntruthseeker 2412
كساريات 37
Color Revolutions and Geopolitics 27
Stop Nato 4715 Blog 3098 Original Content 7006
Corbett Report 2385
Stop Imperialism 491
Land Destroyer 1206
Webster Tarpley Website 1111

Compiled Feeds

Public Lists

Title Visibility
Funny Public