Ever had to deal with a narcissist in the real world? Sadly, I've had to. Oh how they lie and lie. Lies give cover to other lies, regularly.Link
Narcissists view other people as objects and feel completely justified in exploiting them. Lying is integral to impression management and mirroring; the lies enable narcissists to present false images of themselves to potential targets
With the media mouthpieces, alt as well as msm, always at ready to do their bidding it's easy enough for the narcissists in charge to lie, flagrantly. This latest news exemplifies exactly the narcissistic mindset of those that should not lead. They are playing us for fools and the vast majority are more then happy to be foolish fools. (That's clear today in the media hype: alt and msm) The news report below demonstrates how a lie is covered with yet another lie.Despite all the claims that the US 'green lighted' this move by withdrawing troops..... there are a whole bunch of US troops impeding SAA. Despite claims of a deal. It's clear there isn't one. I'm shocked! Not! It was clearly stated here the withdrawal pull back claim was Phooey. Baloney. Hogwash. And the SDF deal with Damascus was shot down as well.
"Watch out for spin doctors. Making non credible claims. Glossing over and obfuscating, today as expected, certain sites are deceiving, obfuscating, employing 5 eyes spin in line with the CIA’s CNN."
US is Not Withdrawing Troops The US withdrawing troops? Or moving them back? Laughable. Recall the big psyop late last year about the US troop withdrawal? Didn't happen then. Isn't happening now.Go back to July 10/19 : U.S Forces Staying in Northern Syria INDEFINITELY
Damascus has NO demonstrable agreement with SDF/YPG/PKK, though that's the claim.Which was covered extensively in today's earlier report, where it was explained clearly why there is no rational or realistic reason to believe this agreement exists.
How to cover that big lie? Why pile on yet another one. No one will question it. Well hardly anyone will? There was no deal. Okay? It didn't exist. Ever. There was no troop withdrawal. No green light. There is just lies on top of lies atop more lies.Morningstar online
"US TROOPS blocked the Syrian army from entering Kobane and Manbij this morning, despite a deal being struck with Kurdish forces allowing them to defend the semi-autonomous region known as Rojava"
I covered the fact that SAA had not entered Manbij yesterday- despite the myriad of bogus claims everywhere.
The Syrian government, meanwhile, said in a press release that the coalition does not let them enter Manbij.
Syrian government stated flat out they can't get to Manbij. Because it's occupied by US troops alongside their Kurdish proxies. The SAA has no deal with the SDF Kurds because the SDF Kurds are in no position to make a deal. Which is why Russia has been negotiating with non SDF allied Kurds. Get it? SDF/YPG/PKK can't make deals. They are embedded with Usrael.
"A military agreement has been negotiated by the Syrian Democratic Forces militia alliance under which the Syrian Arab Army (SAA) would enter the largely Kurdish cities of Kobane and Manbij.The government forces began mobilising to the area late on Sunday night to protect the towns, which had come under fierce bombardment by the Turkish military and its jihadist allies of the Free Syrian Army.But early today, US forces had blocked the bridge which is the main road into Manbij to stop SAA forces from advancing to the city.Footage showed four vehicles across the road barring anyone from passing.The US claimed it was “deconflicting” with Moscow and the Syrian government so that the SAA forces can find a route into Kobane while keeping US personnel safe.But sources indicated that the US was also blocking roads outside Kobane and video footage circulated appearing to show vehicles preventing entry.Talks between the Syrian Democratic Forces and the Syrian government produced the agreement, which is purely on a military basis.Rojava’s autonomous administration remains responsible for running the areas under its control while political negotiations were said to be continuing."
Rubbish, rubbish, rubbish. As stated in today's earlier post- News report # 5
(a) Should we believe that at a time when Damascus is holding all the cards they make a deal that doesn't require the administrative return of these areas to the central Syrian government? Does that make sense to you?
There is no deal between Damascus and SDF. There never was. The claims about this deal were so absurd and false it could have only been spin. And yet, most people are happy to go along with the lie. The US troops are still present. That's clear too.
Recent related that isn't already embedded above:
-
War's First Casualty: Truth. Turkish Fighters Kill Kurdish Politician? Or Rival Kurds Kill Politician?
-
Operation Peace Spring: Explosion Near US Soldiers Occupying Alongside Kurdish Proxies- Source Unclear
-
Operation Peace Spring- Day 2
-
As Expected Assad Sends Reinforcements To Eastern Euphrates
Check Scott's latest @ nomadiceveryman- he's talking Syria and the lies about the SDF/Damscus deal.
*Max Blumenthal is Still a Servant of the Regime Change Business Class, Always Has Been
Scott is also covering the ABC News retraction mentioned in the comment section of my previous post. So glad not everyone is buying the lies. Sad that so many are.
PennyOctober 14, 2019 at 1:02 PMFake news outed:https://freebeacon.com/politics/abc-news-airs-syria-footage-that-was-ac…"ABC News aired footage claiming to show a Turkish attack on a Syrian border town that was actually from a 2017 video of an American shooting range.""But the footage appears to be taken from a YouTube video uploaded by user derekknoll titled "Knob Creek night shoot 2017," showing a controlled machine gun fire at a gun range. The caption reads "2017, Merica."We've taken down video that aired on World News Tonight Sunday and Good Morning America this morning that appeared to be from the Syrian border immediately after questions were raised about its accuracy," a spokesperson told the Washington Free Beacon in a statement. "ABC News regrets the error."A source familiar with the matter told the Free Beacon that ABC News had obtained the footage from a third party — who cited the dangerous situation on the border to avoid giving fuller details — and that there would be an investigation into how the footage made it on to air."