Visit ArabTopics.com

NATO’s colonization of Ukraine under guise of partnership

By Scott Ritter | RT | June 13, 2020

NATO has extended yet another in a long line of “incentives” designed to tease Ukraine with the prospects of joining the transatlantic alliance, while stopping short of actual membership.

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has designated Ukraine as an “Enhanced Opportunity Partner,” making it one of six nations (the others being Georgia, Sweden, Finland, Australia and Jordan) rewarded for their significant contributions to NATO operations and alliance objectives by having the opportunity for increased dialogue and cooperation with the alliance.

A main objective of this enhanced interaction is for NATO and Ukraine to develop operational capabilities and interoperability through military exercises which will enable Ukrainian military personnel to gain practical hands-on experience in operating with NATO partners.

Seen in this light, the “Enhanced Opportunity Partner” status is an extension of the “Partnership Interoperability Initiative” designed to maintain the military interoperability between NATO and Ukraine, developed after more than a decade of involvement by Ukraine in the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan. Thus Kiev keeps open the door for the possibility of military cooperation in any future NATO operational commitment, ensuring that Ukrainian military forces would be able to fight side by side with NATO if called upon to do so.
Also on rt.com NATO owes Ukraine $200 BILLION over Kiev’s decision to forgo nuclear arsenal in 1990s – ex-MP

The designation of “Enhanced Opportunity Partner” is the latest example of NATO outreach to Ukraine, which fosters the possibility of full membership, something that the Ukrainian Parliament called its strategic foreign and security policy objective back in 2017. The current president, Volodymyr Zelensky, has likewise expressed his desire to put engagement with NATO at the top of his policy priorities.

The dream of Ukraine becoming a member of NATO dates back three decades. Dialogue and cooperation between NATO and Ukraine began in October 1991, on the eve of the collapse of the Soviet Union, when a newly independent Ukraine joined the North Atlantic Cooperation Council (NACC). NACC was envisioned as a forum for dialogue and cooperation between NATO and the non-Russian members of the former Warsaw Pact. Then came the “Partnership for Peace” program in 1994, giving Ukraine the opportunity to develop closer ties with the alliance.

In July 1997 Ukraine and NATO signed the “Charter on a Distinctive Partnership,” which established a NATO-Ukraine Commission intended to further political dialogue and cooperation “at all appropriate levels.” In November 2002 Ukraine signed an “Individual Partnership Plan” with NATO outlining a program of assistance and practical support designed to facilitate Ukraine’s membership in the alliance, and followed that up in 2005 with the so-called “Intensive Dialogue” related to Ukraine’s NATO aspirations.
Also on rt.com Ukraine’s ex-leader Poroshenko blames President Zelensky’s office for helping ‘fabricate’ audio of his call with Biden

In 2008 NATO declared that Ukraine could become a full member when it was ready to join and could meet the criteria for membership, but refused Ukraine’s request to enter into a formal Membership Action Plan. The lack of popular support within Ukraine for NATO membership, combined with a change in government that saw Viktor Yanukovych take the helm as President, prompted Ukraine to back away from its previous plans to join NATO.

This all changed in 2014 when, in the aftermath of the Euromaidan unrest Yanakovych was driven out of office, eventually replaced by Petro Poroshenko, who found himself facing off against a militant minority in the Donbas and the Russian government in the Crimea. The outbreak of fighting in eastern Ukraine since 2014 prompted Poroshenko to renew Ukraine’s call to be brought in as a full-fledged NATO member, something the transatlantic alliance has to date failed to act on.

There is a saying that if something looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, then it must be a duck. Given its lengthy history of political and military interaction with NATO, including a decade-long military deployment in Afghanistan, Ukraine has achieved a level of interoperability with NATO that exceeds that of some actual members. US and NATO military personnel are on the ground in Ukraine conducting training, while Ukrainian forces are deployed in support of several ongoing NATO military commitments, including Iraq and Kosovo. Ukraine looks like NATO, talks like NATO, acts like NATO – but it is not NATO. Nor will it ever be.
Also on rt.com NATO’s call on ‘like-minded nations’ to stand up to rise of China is just a desperate bid for global relevance

The critical question to be asked is precisely what kind of relationship NATO envisions having with Ukraine. While the status of “enhanced opportunity partner” implies a way toward eventual NATO membership, the reality is that there is no discernable path that would bring Ukraine to this objective. The rampant political corruption in the country today is disqualifying under any circumstances, and the dispute with Hungary over Ukraine curbing minority rights represents a death knell in a consensus-driven organization like NATO.

But the real dealbreaker is the ongoing standoff between Kiev and Moscow over Crimea. There is virtually no scenario that has Russia leaving it voluntarily or by force. The prospects of enabling Ukraine to resolve the conflict by force of arms simply by invoking Article 5 of the UN Charter is not something NATO either seeks or desires.

Which leaves one wondering at NATO’s true objective in continuing to string Ukraine along. The answer lies in the composition of the six nations that have been granted “enhanced opportunity partner” status. Four of them – Ukraine, Georgia, Sweden and Finland – directly face off against Russia on a broad front stretching from the Arctic to the Black Sea. Jordan’s interests intersect with Moscow’s in Syria. Australia provides NATO with an opening for expanding its reach into the Pacific, an objective recently outlined by NATO Secretary General, Jens Stoltenberg.

NATO aspires to be a political organization, but in reality it is nothing more than a military alliance with geopolitical ambition. Its effectiveness rests in its ability to project military power, and in order to do this effectively, the military organizations involved must possess a high level of interoperability across a wide spectrum of areas, including command and control, logistics and equipment.
Also on rt.com NATO-backed group admits it doesn’t care about Orban’s disregard for ‘Western values,’ so long as Hungary helps oppose Russia

By extending the status of “enhanced opportunity partner” to Ukraine and the other five nations, NATO is expanding its military capabilities without taking on the risks associated with expanding its membership; Ukrainian troops can be sacrificed in some far-off land void of any real national security interest to the Ukrainian people, and yet NATO will never mobilize under Article 5 to come to Kiev’s aid on its own soil. In many ways, the relationship mirrors that of a colonial master to its subjects, demanding much while delivering little. At the end of the day, the status of “enhanced opportunity partner” is little more than that of a glorified minion who trades its own flesh and blood for the false promise of opportunity that will never materialize.

Scott Ritter is a former US Marine Corps intelligence officer. He served in the Soviet Union as an inspector implementing the INF Treaty, in General Schwarzkopf’s staff during the Gulf War, and from 1991-1998 as a UN weapons inspector. Follow him on Twitter @RealScottRitter

Source: 
Aletho News

Dear friends of this aggregator

  • Yes, I intentionally removed Newsbud from the aggregator on Mar 22.
  • Newsbud did not block the aggregator, although their editor blocked me on twitter after a comment I made to her
  • As far as I know, the only site that blocks this aggregator is Global Research. I have no idea why!!
  • Please stop recommending Newsbud and Global Research to be added to the aggregator.

Support this site

News Sources

Source Items
Please Stop the Ride 32
The Infectious Myth 27
Lockdown Skeptics 86
Sam Husseini 34
Dr. Andrew Kaufman 3
Swiss Propaganda Research 53
Off Guardian 199
Cory Morningstar 10
James Bovard 88
WWI Hidden History 51
Grayzone Project 479
Pass Blue 421
Dilyana Gaytandzhieva 17
John Pilger 428
The Real News 367
Scrutinised Minds 29
Need To Know News 3591
FEE 5562
Marine Le Pen 432
Francois Asselineau 25
Opassande 53
HAX on 5July 220
Henrik Alexandersson 1293
Mohamed Omar 404
Professors Blog 10
Arg Blatte Talar 40
Angry Foreigner 19
Fritte Fritzson 12
Teologiska rummet 36
Filosofiska rummet 149
Vetenskapsradion Historia 197
Snedtänkt (Kalle Lind) 266
Les Crises 4176
Richard Falk 231
Ian Sinclair 142
SpinWatch 61
Counter Currents 13036
Kafila 715
Gail Malone 45
Transnational Foundation 221
Rick Falkvinge 95
The Duran 11965
Vanessa Beeley 236
Nina Kouprianova 9
MintPress 6257
Paul Craig Roberts 2766
News Junkie Post 77
Nomi Prins 27
Kurt Nimmo 191
Strategic Culture 6496
Sir Ken Robinson 88
Stephan Kinsella 124
Liberty Blitzkrieg 889
Sami Bedouin 65
Consortium News 2685
21 Century Wire 4337
Burning Blogger 324
Stephen Gowans 105
David D. Friedman 188
Anarchist Standard 16
The BRICS Post 1545
Tom Dispatch 662
Levant Report 18
The Saker 5346
The Barnes Review 623
John Friend 545
Psyche Truth 160
Jonathan Cook 173
New Eastern Outlook 5113
School Sucks Project 1842
Giza Death Star 2250
Andrew Gavin Marshall 28
Red Ice Radio 710
GMWatch 2670
Robert Faurisson 150
Espionage History Archive 35
Jay's Analysis 1217
Le 4ème singe 91
Jacob Cohen 226
Agora Vox 20302
Cercle Des Volontaires 458
Panamza 2676
Fairewinds 124
Project Censored 1274
Spy Culture 634
Conspiracy Archive 85
Crystal Clark 25
Timothy Kelly 669
PINAC 1482
The Conscious Resistance 1127
Independent Science News 94
The Anti Media 6895
Positive News 820
Brandon Martinez 30
Steven Chovanec 61
Lionel 318
The Mind renewed 465
Natural Society 2627
Yanis Varoufakis 1179
Tragedy & Hope 122
Dr. Tim Ball 114
Web of Debt 171
Porkins Policy Review 463
Conspiracy Watch 174
Eva Bartlett 650
Libyan War Truth 382
DeadLine Live 1916
Kevin Ryan 69
BSNEWS 2142
Aaron Franz 279
Traces of Reality 166
Revelations Radio News 128
Dr. Bruce Levine 162
Peter B Collins 1854
Faux Capitalism 205
Dissident Voice 12346
Climate Audit 228
Donna Laframboise 531
Judith Curry 1205
Geneva Business Insider 40
Media Monarchy 2831
Syria Report 84
Human Rights Investigation 94
Intifada (Voice of Palestine) 1685
Down With Tyranny 14057
Laura Wells Solutions 51
Video Rebel's Blog 497
Revisionist Review 485
Aletho News 23538
ضد العولمة 27
Penny for your thoughts 3487
Northerntruthseeker 3112
كساريات 37
Color Revolutions and Geopolitics 27
Stop Nato 4949
AntiWar.com Blog 3504
AntiWar.com Original Content 7863
Corbett Report 2749
Stop Imperialism 491
Land Destroyer 1333
Webster Tarpley Website 1165

Compiled Feeds

Public Lists

Title Visibility
Funny Public