Visit ArabTopics.com

More SKS in the Mann Pleadings

I am in the process of writing a post showing that Mann’s claim that he had personally been exonerated by the UK House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (report here) of a wide range of counts was also untrue. It’s so untrue that it’s hard to even make an interesting post of it.

In the process of writing the post, I noticed the following quotation from Mann’s Reply Memorandum, which has some extra interest given the evidence that the doctored quotation in Mann’s pleadings came from the SKS blog, rather than original documents. Mann and/or Cozen O’Connor wrote:

In March 2010, the United Kingdom’s House of Commons Science and Technology Committee published a report finding that the skeptics’ criticisms of the CRU were misplaced, and that its actions “were in line with common practice in the climate science community.”

The first sentence is completely untrue: the Committee Report said nothing of the sort. The assertion that “criticisms of the CRU were misplaced” is neither made nor supported in the Committee Report. This phrase originated instead with SKS, who, once again, altered the language, though, in this case, not going so far as to fabricate a quotation.

Contrary to the assertion that the Commons Committee had found that criticisms of CRU were misplaced, the Commons Committee was extremely sympathetic to criticisms of data obstruction, particularly given the importance of climate science. For example, they stated that, if CRU’s practices were “found to be in line with the rest of climate science, the question would arise whether climate science methods of operation need to change”. (It is hard to conceive of a more thorough misrepresentation of this finding than the wording in the Mann/Cozen O’Connor pleading.)

As we explained in chapter 2, the practices and methods of climate science are a key issue. If the practices of CRU are found to be in line with the rest of climate science, the question would arise whether climate science methods of operation need to change. In this event we would recommend that the scientific community should consider changing those practices to ensure greater transparency.

In paragraph 54, the Committee again unequivocally pointed to the importance of climate science for public policy and the resulting transparency requirement:

54. It is not standard practice in climate science and many other fields to publish the raw data and the computer code in academic papers. We think that this is problematic because climate science is a matter of global importance and of public interest, and therefore the quality and transparency of the science should be irreproachable. We therefore consider that climate scientists should take steps to make available all the data used to generate their published work, including raw data; and it should also be made clear and referenced where data has been used but, because of commercial or national security reasons is not available. Scientists are also, under Freedom of Information laws and under the rules of normal scientific conduct, entitled to withhold data which is due to be published under the peer-review process. 78 In addition, scientists should take steps to make available in full their methodological workings, including the computer codes. Data and methodological workings should be provided via the internet. There should be enough information published to allow verification.

Similar statements are made throughout the report. Rather than the report rebuffing “skeptic” demands for data transparency, the Committee squarely endorsed these demands.

In this context, they commented that the “focus” on Phil Jones was “misplaced” – not because transparency was wrong, but because the problem was more far-reaching than Jones himself. They observed that “many of the problems at UEA” would have been avoided with data transparency. In the Summary, for example, they stated:

We believe that the focus on CRU and Professor Phil Jones, Director of CRU, in particular, has largely been misplaced. Whilst we are concerned that the disclosed e-mails suggest a blunt refusal to share scientific data and methodologies with others, we can sympathise with Professor Jones, who must have found it frustrating to handle requests for data that he knew -or perceived- were motivated by a desire simply to undermine his work.

In the context of the sharing of data and methodologies, we consider that Professor Jones’s actions were in line with common practice in the climate science community. It is not standard practice in climate science to publish the raw data and the computer code in academic papers. However, climate science is a matter of great importance and the quality of the science should be irreproachable. We therefore consider that climate scientists should take steps to make available all the data that support their work (including raw data) and full methodological workings (including the computer codes). Had both been available, many of the problems at UEA could have been avoided.

The Committee thoroughly endorsed demands for data transparency as a matter of considerable urgency and categorically did not find that “skeptics’ criticism” was “misplaced” on this point – only the focus on Jones.

As noted above, the phrase “criticisms of CRU were misplaced” does not occur in the Committee Report. The first few Google entries for the phrase point to SKS, with the first entry pointing to the same SKS post providing the doctored quotation in the Mann pleadings about the Muir Russell report. Here is the phrase as occurring at SKS: indeed not only the phrase, but the entire sentence is pretty much lifted from SKS. (This is true of other points in the pleading as well, a matter that I will return to.)

sks on parliament

Source: 
Climate Audit

Dear friends of this aggregator

  • Yes, I intentionally removed Newsbud from the aggregator on Mar 22.
  • Newsbud did not block the aggregator, although their editor blocked me on twitter after a comment I made to her
  • As far as I know, the only site that blocks this aggregator is Global Research. I have no idea why!!
  • Please stop recommending Newsbud and Global Research to be added to the aggregator.

Support this site

News Sources

Source Items
Please Stop the Ride 26
The Infectious Myth 26
Lockdown Skeptics 50
Sam Husseini 33
Dr. Andrew Kaufman 3
Swiss Propaganda Research 34
Off Guardian 136
Cory Morningstar 10
James Bovard 69
WWI Hidden History 51
Grayzone Project 448
Pass Blue 395
Dilyana Gaytandzhieva 17
John Pilger 426
The Real News 367
Scrutinised Minds 29
Need To Know News 3472
FEE 5492
Marine Le Pen 419
Francois Asselineau 25
Opassande 53
HAX on 5July 220
Henrik Alexandersson 1256
Mohamed Omar 404
Professors Blog 10
Arg Blatte Talar 40
Angry Foreigner 19
Fritte Fritzson 12
Teologiska rummet 36
Filosofiska rummet 148
Vetenskapsradion Historia 197
Snedtänkt (Kalle Lind) 265
Les Crises 4072
Richard Falk 225
Ian Sinclair 137
SpinWatch 61
Counter Currents 12754
Kafila 680
Gail Malone 45
Transnational Foundation 221
Rick Falkvinge 95
The Duran 11610
Vanessa Beeley 226
Nina Kouprianova 9
MintPress 6163
Paul Craig Roberts 2650
News Junkie Post 75
Nomi Prins 27
Kurt Nimmo 191
Strategic Culture 6314
Sir Ken Robinson 82
Stephan Kinsella 123
Liberty Blitzkrieg 888
Sami Bedouin 65
Consortium News 2685
21 Century Wire 4219
Burning Blogger 324
Stephen Gowans 103
David D. Friedman 168
Anarchist Standard 16
The BRICS Post 1543
Tom Dispatch 645
Levant Report 18
The Saker 5222
The Barnes Review 612
John Friend 538
Psyche Truth 160
Jonathan Cook 173
New Eastern Outlook 4990
School Sucks Project 1833
Giza Death Star 2213
Andrew Gavin Marshall 28
Red Ice Radio 698
GMWatch 2629
Robert Faurisson 150
Espionage History Archive 35
Jay's Analysis 1193
Le 4ème singe 91
Jacob Cohen 224
Agora Vox 19987
Cercle Des Volontaires 458
Panamza 2639
Fairewinds 122
Project Censored 1263
Spy Culture 631
Conspiracy Archive 85
Crystal Clark 19
Timothy Kelly 658
PINAC 1482
The Conscious Resistance 1091
Independent Science News 91
The Anti Media 6895
Positive News 820
Brandon Martinez 30
Steven Chovanec 61
Lionel 318
The Mind renewed 463
Natural Society 2627
Yanis Varoufakis 1165
Tragedy & Hope 122
Dr. Tim Ball 114
Web of Debt 168
Porkins Policy Review 459
Conspiracy Watch 174
Eva Bartlett 648
Libyan War Truth 381
DeadLine Live 1916
Kevin Ryan 69
BSNEWS 2135
Aaron Franz 275
Traces of Reality 166
Revelations Radio News 126
Dr. Bruce Levine 162
Peter B Collins 1814
Faux Capitalism 205
Dissident Voice 12156
Climate Audit 227
Donna Laframboise 519
Judith Curry 1200
Geneva Business Insider 40
Media Monarchy 2786
Syria Report 84
Human Rights Investigation 94
Intifada (Voice of Palestine) 1685
Down With Tyranny 13814
Laura Wells Solutions 51
Video Rebel's Blog 488
Revisionist Review 485
Aletho News 23224
ضد العولمة 27
Penny for your thoughts 3444
Northerntruthseeker 3007
كساريات 37
Color Revolutions and Geopolitics 27
Stop Nato 4913
AntiWar.com Blog 3460
AntiWar.com Original Content 7759
Corbett Report 2707
Stop Imperialism 491
Land Destroyer 1307
Webster Tarpley Website 1160

Compiled Feeds

Public Lists

Title Visibility
Funny Public