Language
Undefined
0
No votes yet
"Monkeypox"
Is the next pandemic narrative already set?
- - -
A few months ago we were still assuming that the Corona hysteria would be replaced by some new alleged animal flu. The fact that there has been talk of "monkeypox" for a few days now surprised us a little at first. But a closer look at the official disease definition makes it clear: "Corona" and "monkeypox" can indeed be very easily interchanged as a pandemic narrative.
- - -
CONTENTS
- what is supposed to have happened so far in terms of monkeypox according to the WHO?
- how is monkeypox defined?
- what parallels are there between monkeypox and corona?
- how easy is it to exchange pandemic narratives?
- what becomes of the Corona narrative?
- what is the new G7 simulation about?
- is the monkeypox narrative coming in a big way or will it disappear again?
- - -
ℹ️ more information about our project can be found at www.projekt-immanuel.de
deepL translate : https://t.me/projekt_immanuel/100
————
Monkeypox
deepL: https://projekt-immanuel.de/affenpocken/
Is the next pandemic narrative already set?
When we recently heard that scientists and the media were spreading the next scaremongering with monkeypox, we were a little surprised at first, as we had actually expected something like a new animal flu. With some supposed pathogen that would once again trigger unspecific respiratory symptoms, which would have simply meant changing the name of the narrative, but otherwise everything would have remained the same. Now there should actually be a supposed pathogen spreading that is supposed to produce specific, easily recognisable symptoms?
You might think that with a term like "smallpox", but it is not so at all. Because even a first glance at the official definition of the disease makes it clear: monkeypox would not change the narrative that much, on the contrary. Monkeypox is actually quite suitable to take over from Corona. And should they indeed represent the next pandemic narrative, we can already say: No, the next alleged "pandemic" will definitely not be worse than the last one.
Last year's junk, only repackaged
Let's first take a look at how "monkeypox" is exactly defined. According to the Robert Koch Institute, "monkeypox" is a viral disease (genus orthopoxvirus), which, contrary to the name, is mainly transmitted from rodents to humans. Transmission from person to person, on the other hand, is rather rare and only possible in close contact. In addition, the disease is actually restricted to parts of Africa, which is why "monkeypox" is referred to as an endemic disease, i.e. a disease that is said to occur only in a certain area or only among a certain population and to occur regularly there.
In the past, it has happened from time to time that individual cases have also been diagnosed as monkeypox outside Africa. Now, in May 2022, according to the WHO, there would have been a number of confirmed cases of "monkeypox" in several countries. These include Great Britain (8 cases), Portugal (5 cases) and the USA (1 case), as well as other suspected cases in several countries. They are already looking for the sources of infection, observing the contact persons of those infected, etc.
The first confirmed case was also reported in Germany on 20 May.
Clinically, monkeypox is said to manifest itself with the following symptoms:
- Fever
- Chills
- headache, muscle and joint pain
- Swollen lymph nodes
- in rare cases, an unproductive cough
- Skin changes (skin fluorescences) of various kinds
Overall, the disease is said to be not quite as dangerous as real/classical smallpox, but there would of course be risk groups. Especially for very young or "immunocompromised" people, the disease can easily be fatal.
Fortunately, there is already a supposedly very effective antiviral drug against "monkeypox" that has been approved in Europe and the USA since January 2022. At the moment, however, it is not yet available on a large scale.
The transmission of the disease allegedly occurs primarily through body fluids (contact, smear, droplet infection), which in humans means primarily transmission in the area of health care and, of course, during sex. At the same time, it is said that even before the outbreak of the disease, it is possible to transmit the alleged virus through "excreted respiratory secretions during face-to-face contact" (source: RKI).
The RKI finds it worrying that large parts of the world's population no longer have any significant immune protection from previous smallpox vaccinations. This is despite the fact that in recent years, an increasing number of "monkeypox" infections have been detected in humans. Therefore, the classical smallpox vaccinations should be resumed, as they might also be effective against "monkeypox". There is already a great vaccine for this, which is supposed to contain a modified vaccinia virus Ankara (attenuated cowpox virus).
The general recommendation of the RKI when dealing with monkeypox is: If there are suspicious symptoms, travelers returning from Africa and of course their contacts should be observed. However, since there would also be increased cases of infected persons without a travel history, i.e. people for whom it is not clear whether they previously came from endemic areas in Africa, people whose symptoms (especially the skin changes) indicate an infection with "monkeypox" should be considered as potentially infected persons.
In order to prevent spread, doctors and laboratories should of course immediately report possible cases of infection in accordance with the Infection Protection Act. These would then be systematically recorded by the RKI. Specialised laboratories such as those of the RKI also offer molecular diagnostics so that infections with monkeypox can be examined in more detail right away. So far, the risk of infection in Germany is considered to be very low.
The diagnosis of "monkeypox" is currently carried out by (who would have thought it) PCR or "virus detection" in the laboratory. However, doctors should always carry out differential diagnostic considerations. This means that they should also consider that all the symptoms attributed to "monkeypox" could well be a whole range of other diseases.
The monkeypox virus (Orthopoxvirus simiae) is said to be an enveloped DNA virus, and infection leaves a lasting immunity.
So much for the official orthodox medical definition of "monkeypox" and the current, worldwide situation, according to information from the RKI and the WHO [as of 20.05.22].
Now let's compare the whole thing with the Corona narrative and see if and how much the two narratives resemble each other.
Nature of the disease
Corona and monkeypox are both alleged viral diseases, and both are said to be primarily zoonoses, i.e. diseases transmitted from animals to humans (or vice versa). With Corona it was the bat, with monkeypox it is now rodents.
-> Most people probably don't even know that in the case of Corona, at the beginning of 2020, it was still said that transmission from human to human was not possible or very unlikely, which is why there was initially no concern about a spread in China. But when PCR tests were introduced, a very slight human-to-human transmission was suddenly detected.
In the case of monkeypox, human-to-human transmission is already said to be possible but rare. We can be curious to see how long it will take this time before the 'rare' becomes 'very easy and fast'. PCR test methods for monkeypox already exist in principle.
Clinical picture
What about the symptoms of monkeypox? How many of them are also in the definition of COVID-19?
All of them. Which is not surprising, since the absurd disease definition of COVID-19 is now so extensive that there are probably very few symptoms that cannot also be attributed to COVID-19 in one way or another.
Skin lesions are also included in COVID-19?
Yes, these too. In studies (what else?) from various countries, a whole range of skin changes in alleged COVID patients were investigated as early as 2020. These skin changes were subsequently listed as official symptoms of COVID-19, although they are usually only listed as completely non-specific "skin changes (exanthema)". Thus, a huge spectrum of symptoms was summarily listed as a symptom of COVID-19.
Some have even gone so far as to claim that in some cases COVID-19 would manifest itself exclusively through skin symptoms. Itchy wheals, oozing blisters, spots, swelling, open sores, pustules, etc.. All according to studies also contained in COVID-19.
-> Anyone who knows how the definition of COVID-19 came about also knows that you can't put anything past such studies. Whoever got a positive corona test, their symptoms were documented and thus ended up in the official clinical picture. Basically, it didn't matter what the symptoms were. Accordingly, the COVID 19 symptom catalogue grew steadily until COVID could finally be everything and nothing at all, thus becoming the most ridiculous disease definition in the history of orthodox medicine.
In monkeypox, too, the skin changes according to the definition are manifold. It starts, as so often, with fever, chills, etc. and when the first skin symptoms appear after a few days (often on the face), "pockmarked exanthema" is said to form first, which again can be and by definition is anything - spots, fluid-filled vesicles, pus-filled vesicles, etc.
Fine apparent differences in symptoms, usually defined in minute details, which are often used as an argument to claim that the unspecific symptom complexes of certain disease definitions can certainly be distinguished from each other and are not comparable at all, are medically, scientifically untenable, not to say eyewash. In our article on the disease definition of COVID-19, we have already shown the curious way in which attempts have been made since 2020 to present COVID-19 as an independent disease that could be "clearly" distinguished from the common cold or influenza.
After the first skin changes have appeared, they are supposed to gradually develop on other parts of the body as well. On the limbs, in the genital area, on the abdomen, etc. All this is also included in the international definition of COVID-19.
-> And not only in it. Nowadays, such skin changes are often diagnosed as scabies, even if there is no evidence for the presence of mites. In the first one and a half years of the Corona crisis, there are said to have been quite a number of cases of scabies in Germany, which in many cases is probably only due to the fact that the people in question simply did not test positive.
Symptoms without a positive PCR test = scabies (or neurodermatitis); identical symptoms with a positive PCR test = COVID.
In this way, one can also claim widespread vaccination successes and even the eradication of diseases. The definition of a disease is softened in such a way that the symptoms are completely unspecific and can thus also be assigned to other diseases. If the symptoms remain the same, they simply diagnose something else: "The patient can no longer have this disease, because he has been vaccinated against it, so it must be something else."
The entire symptomatology of monkeypox is therefore also contained in Corona. A great many of the alleged Corona cases (those without severe pneumonia) could therefore easily be rediagnosed as monkeypox cases on the basis of their symptoms.
The clinical picture of monkeypox is not as comprehensive as that of Corona, but what is not, can still be with the help of studies. Then we might find out that monkeypox does not necessarily cause skin lesions, but can also trigger various respiratory problems.
Alleged modes of transmission
In the case of Corona, the alleged smear infection was eventually dismissed as improbable, which did not prevent many people from continuing to maltreat their hands with aggressive disinfectant and to wear latex gloves all the time. Monkeypox, on the other hand, is said to be spread primarily by contact and smear infection, but droplet infection is also possible. This means: everyone would have to wear a mask again, disinfection would also become compulsory again and gloves possibly too.
One can already imagine the headlines of the "quality media":
"Experts recommend wearing full-body condoms during sexual intercourse".
"Virologist XY suggests banning all physical contact for the next 5 years".
"Childbearing only fuels pandemic, says family minister"
So also in terms of transmission and the measures associated with it, there wouldn't be too much difference to Corona. And here too, of course, the definition could change over time.
Dangerousness of the disease
Monkeypox is said not to be as dangerous as "classical smallpox" and the risk of transmission is also rather low. However, there are of course a few risk groups that should be protected, especially children. Otherwise, the infections are supposed to be mild.
If you change the name of the disease and put old people instead of children as the alleged risk group, you basically have the initial Corona narrative one to one. And as we remember from the early days of Corona, such statements mean absolutely nothing. Even Christian Drosten and the German Health Minister at the time, Jens Spahn, quickly changed their initial opinions on Corona from 'it's more harmless than flu, no need to panic' to 'the epidemic of the century is here, prepare to die'. It happens faster than you think. Therefore, it would be more than foolish to put any stock in (current) assessments, forecasts and opinions of 'experts' and politicians on the subject of monkeypox.
Medical treatment
And what about the treatment of monkeypox? Are there parallels to Corona? There would already be an antiviral treatment for monkeypox, which, as luck would have it, was approved in Europe and the US earlier this year. How lucky we are. Then, unlike with Corona, we are not completely defenceless if the monkeypox virus should finally spread in Germany. The drug cannot be mass-produced at the moment, but we assume that our health minister will order huge quantities of it for the whole of Germany as a precautionary measure.
-> The synthetic-chemical drugs that are predominantly used in orthodox medicine have either a "stimulating" effect, i.e. a strengthening effect, or a relaxing, calming effect. The reinforcing agents, the sympathicotonics, include, for example, the antibiotics and many other agents that are used primarily for supposed "infectious diseases".
Basically, all the remedies prescribed by orthodox medicine against infectious diseases are basically toxic. Not so toxic that you would die right away, but they are definitely anything but good for the body. Officially, the effect of the drugs is supposed to be that the evil pathogens are fought, e.g. by killing them or preventing them from multiplying. However, the actual effect of the drugs is merely to reduce or even suppress the symptoms, which is why a temporary improvement can occur after taking them, but this fades as soon as the drug has been broken down and excreted by the body.
This effect can indeed be useful in severe cases; if someone has very bad symptoms, the administration of antibiotics can help temporarily. However, such drugs should only be taken for a short time and only in emergencies, as they can also cause damage, especially if taken for a longer period of time.
Antivirals of any kind, on the other hand, are simply toxic and, from the point of view of new biological and medical findings (new medicine/universal biology), have no benefit.
But the real recommendation against monkeypox is of course (how could it be otherwise?) vaccination. And fortunately for all of us, the classical smallpox vaccines are also supposed to be effective against monkeypox. So maybe we don't have to wait another year for vaccines to be developed. Just order a few hundred million doses of the vaccine, refresh the smallpox vaccination throughout the country, and the matter could be settled.
So the difference with Corona might be that this time it would be done with just one vaccination. But we wouldn't want to bet on that. And the vaccine against (monkey) smallpox will be toxic in any case!
Basically, all the remedies prescribed by orthodox medicine against infectious diseases are basically toxic. Not so toxic that you would die right away, but they are definitely anything but good for the body. Officially, the effect of the drugs is supposed to be that the evil pathogens are fought, e.g. by killing them or preventing them from multiplying. However, the actual effect of the drugs is merely to reduce or even suppress the symptoms, which is why a temporary improvement can occur after taking them, but this fades as soon as the drug has been broken down and excreted by the body.
This effect can indeed be useful in severe cases; if someone has very bad symptoms, the administration of antibiotics can help temporarily. However, such drugs should only be taken for a short time and only in emergencies, as they can also cause damage, especially if taken for a longer period of time.
Antivirals of any kind, on the other hand, are simply toxic and, from the point of view of new biological and medical findings (new medicine/universal biology), have no benefit.
But the real recommendation against monkeypox is of course (how could it be otherwise?) vaccination. And fortunately for all of us, the classical smallpox vaccines are also supposed to be effective against monkeypox. So maybe we don't have to wait another year for vaccines to be developed. Just order a few hundred million doses of the vaccine, refresh the smallpox vaccination throughout the country, and the matter could be settled.
So the difference with Corona might be that this time it would be done with just one vaccination. But we wouldn't want to bet on that. And the vaccine against (monkey) smallpox will be toxic in any case!
Diagnostics and case definition
How similar are Corona and monkeypox in these respects? How a "confirmed case" is officially defined and diagnosed can change over time, so this point is also only a temporary inventory.
Monkeypox virus is, of course, primarily diagnosed by PCR. But alleged "virus detection" is also a possibility, which means nothing more than killing a cell culture in the lab and then claiming without clean controls that this caused a virus. The same game as with Corona and many other viral diseases as well.
In the case of Corona, it was still the case at the beginning that the RKI also allowed a pure assumption as confirmation of a case at medical institutions. The RKI's case definition in mid-2020 still stated:
Epidemiological confirmation in the case of "occurrence of two or more pneumonias (specific clinical picture) in a medical facility, nursing home or home for the elderly, where an epidemic connection is probable or suspected, even without the presence of evidence of a pathogen." This point was then deleted from the case definition at the end of 2020.
Epidemiological confirmation in the case of "occurrence of two or more pneumonias (pneumonias) (specific clinical picture) in a medical facility, nursing home or home for the elderly, where an epidemic link is probable or suspected, even without the presence of pathogen evidence". This point was then deleted from the case definition at the end of 2020.
In the case of monkeypox, laboratory diagnostics, which are just as meaningless but at least give the appearance of scientific seriousness, still seem to be recommended as the sole confirmation at present. Let's see if it stays that way.
Moreover, and this is something in relation to Corona, this time doctors are supposed to consider that the symptoms could possibly also indicate another disease. We are just surprised that the list of possible other diseases does not include COVID-19 (irony). However, should monkeypox PCR tests come on the market in a big way, symptoms will certainly no longer play a role.
Definition of the virus
And last but not least, the corona virus is said to be a single-stranded RNA virus for which it is not clear whether infection confers subsequent at least temporary "immunity", whereas the monkeypox virus is said to be a double-stranded DNA virus that even confers lifelong immunity once you have survived infection. But as we have seen with Corona, politicians, health authorities and vaccine manufacturers can adjust the duration of immunity a bit more if the worst comes to the worst.
We have not looked at the supposed scientific proof of the monkeypox virus at this point. But we have an idea of what to expect when we look at the corresponding publications. To put it better: we are sure that, just as with SARS-CoV-2, there will be no scientific evidence that could even remotely stand up to scrutiny.
With monkeypox, we could be sold about 80% of the Corona narrative again under a new name at the drop of a hat. And if you look at how the Corona narrative has changed over time, we can assume that with the help of the media and a lot of "experts", monkeypox could still be turned into a danger for the whole world.
And what will become of Corona?
There are several ways to get rid of the old narrative or to combine it with the new. If one wants to make Corona disappear, one could do the following:
1.) one claims that the virus has finally mutated into a harmless variant (as was the case with swine flu) and disappeared on its own - even though the current German health minister and expert on everything strictly rejects such a possibility.
2) they claim that the current Corona variant is quite harmless, but that the virus is far from gone, so that the old narrative can be reheated at the end of 2022 or even in a year or two -> at the moment it looks as if they will try it that way
3) a new super-vaccine is brought onto the market that is supposed to be really effective this time. Then a lower vaccination rate would suddenly do the trick, and the virus could ultimately be successfully combated after all. This possibility is conceivable, but it is questionable whether it would be possible to vaccinate another vaccine en masse. Perhaps there will just be an antiviral super-drug on the market that can combat COVID-19 highly successfully and make vaccinations superfluous.
And 4) Corona is simply silenced from one day to the next and the focus is only on the new narrative.
In principle, however, one could also combine the old narrative with the new one, just as one tried to do with the flu in early 2022. In other words, one would try to drive on two tracks and maintain both narratives in parallel. In doing so, one could either continue both alleged diseases separately - if it looks too much like respiratory problems, it is corona, if it affects the skin too much, it is monkeypox - or one tries again with a "twindemic" claim, which could then again lead to funny neologisms such as "monkeypoxona" or "coropox".
A rocket boost for the new narrative?
Theoretically, there would be one aspect that could give a huge boost to the potential new narrative of monkeypox and lead to many people being convinced of its reality and dangerousness.
One of the many possible health after-effects of the corona hysteria would be an increased incidence of various skin disorders in the population. As mentioned before, already in the midst of the Corona crisis, among many other ("unusual") complaints, an increased occurrence of troublesome skin complaints (among others, also among us in the team) became apparent. According to the system of New Medicine/Universal Biology, the cause of these skin changes lies primarily in the (intentional or unintentional) severance of contact with other people, primarily caused by the lockdown and the nonsensical AHA rules, and thus has psychosomatic reasons.
The symptoms do not occur during the psychological stress ("I'm not allowed to see grandma any more..."), but afterwards, when one is mentally detached again and physically relaxes ("I'm finally allowed to see grandma again!"). Incidentally, this is also the reason for the typical holiday cold. Once you are finally away from the unfair boss, the annoying work colleagues or the project that bores and stresses you so much, and now see yourself lying on the beach in the sun for a full two weeks, your body goes into relaxation. The stress falls off you and the body begins to return the functions that were previously throttled back or running at full throttle to normal. This causes the typical symptoms of illness, which is why you lie sick in bed for the first few days of your holiday in the hotel. Once you are back from holiday and back at work, you feel the strain again and your body (unnoticed by you) changes certain functions again, which starts the whole thing all over again.
Such a significantly more frequent occurrence of skin complaints after the corona hysteria would therefore still be theoretically possible, but in practice it is now rather unlikely. Many people have hardly been interested in the required distance since summer 2021, or they had already become so accustomed to the distance to other people that this no longer represented a psychological burden for them. And also with the Corona vaccinations, it became apparent that a very large part of the population did not get vaccinated at all out of conviction or fear of Corona, but rather out of convenience, conformity, laziness, fear of reprisals or, in all seriousness, for a free bratwurst (what a cliché!). Therefore, there may not even be more cases of skin lesions than those that have already occurred during Corona.
But one cannot look into people's heads and therefore cannot say how many may still have psychological stresses active as a result of the Corona hysteria. Stresses that, once resolved, would lead to visible and sometimes severe physical reactions that could then be presented as monkeypox. A renewed, mass generation of psychological stresses with the help of a new narrative and new scaremongering would also be conceivable in principle, but it remains to be seen whether the broad masses would really participate consistently in this again so soon after Corona.
However, all this is just speculation and theoretical considerations. If there is indeed an increased occurrence of skin complaints in the next 12 months, we will write a separate article and explain in detail how these phenomena come about. In any case, they have nothing to do with viruses, that much we can already say.
The suspicious "leopard pox" game
Another indication that strengthens the suspicion that "monkeypox" could become the next pandemic narrative is a simulation game conducted by the G7 health ministers in Berlin on 19 May. Germany, France, Italy, Great Britain, the USA, Canada and Japan played out a hypothetical epidemic situation with fictitious "leopard pox". The basic idea is, of course, to be much better prepared for the next alleged pandemic and thus to be able to react more quickly than with Corona. And the danger of a new pandemic is of course very great according to the "experts".
The starting point of the simulation was probably that in 2023 a leopard bites a human and transmits a dangerous smallpox virus that then spreads rapidly. The mortality rate is astronomically high, of course, and the hospitals are hopelessly overcrowded. In addition, many young people are infected with the virus and a large number of them die. The WHO again declares an international state of emergency, and after 12 weeks there is finally hope in the form of a new vaccine that is being developed. So far so familiar.
Is this simulation realistic?
No, of course not. Neither was the simulation for Corona. And just as with Corona, a pandemic narrative involving smallpox can only be based on the faith and trust of the masses in the "authorities" and not on tangible, verifiable facts.
Isn't this simulation highly suspect?
Not necessarily. The fact that there was already a pandemic simulation with a fictitious corona virus outbreak a few months before the Corona hysteria should be known to everyone by now, which is why many people are naturally highly suspicious now that history seems to be repeating itself. This can be fully understood.
BUT the Corona simulation alone is in no way proof that the Corona crisis must have been a planned production. It is perhaps circumstantial, but not proof. In any case, the beginnings of the Corona crisis in China could also have been only a logical consequence of this simulation.
As can be seen in our comparison above between the definitions of corona and monkeypox, the non-specific symptom complexes of different disease definitions can be interchanged as easily as child's play. And the only thing that can still be seriously claimed to be a pandemic are precisely those non-specific symptom complexes (syndromes) that can be found in countless orthodox medical disease definitions and are interchangeable with each other. Respiratory complaints, skin changes and gastrointestinal complaints are "pandemic", if you will. Quite typical complaints with a wide range that occur regularly in every society (in some cases can also lead to death) and that can be attributed to this or that "pathogen" at will.
So if you had done a simulation with a new animal flu in 2019, you would have just found bat flu in the market in Wuhan in 2020, because that's what you would have seen in cases of illness that occurred. And just as with the coronavirus, the bat flu virus could then have easily been elevated, with the help of studies, to an all-encompassing super virus that can trigger symptoms in any tissue of the body at will.
With the unscientific tricks of virology, every conceivable virus model can then be inserted into the natural proteins of humans and animals in order to ultimately confirm any initial suspicion. There is a suspicion of a coronavirus? Then that's what the virologists "find". SARS, corona, smallpox, hantavirus, Ebola or animal flu. Take your pick and that's what we'll find.
Is this done in bad faith? No, it doesn't have to be. Apart from the fact that the virologists are only doing what they have been trained to do, in such cases they themselves are most likely just as convinced of the suspicion that a new virus must be going around. In addition, they are under pressure and may even be afraid of infection themselves, which quickly gives them tunnel vision and blinds them to errors and contradictions.
It is therefore by no means highly suspicious that a simulation game was made with Corona and "by chance" we then also get a Corona pandemic. "That can't be a coincidence!" No, it isn't, but there doesn't automatically have to be an evil plan behind it either. There may be other aspects that perhaps substantiate the suspicion of a staged crisis, but the 2019 simulation is not one of them. This could also have just become a self-fulfilling prophecy. The governments of the world play out a horror scenario with a corona virus, animal flu or the hantavirus, and suddenly everyone sees corona, animal flu or, indeed, the hantavirus everywhere. Subsequently, the situation and the fear of the citizens are then shamelessly exploited by various entities (who may have only been waiting for such an opportunity) for political, economic and ideological purposes. It COULD perhaps have been like this.
The "leopard pox" plan game, as far as we know, was officially initiated out of concern about the reported cases of monkeypox and their possible spread. So this justification is quite possible and in principle may very well be true. The alleged smallpox is worrying the health ministers and authorities right now, so they are already preparing for smallpox. And yes, then it can easily happen that all cases of disease that are reported and observed from now on are automatically interpreted by those responsible only within the framework of the smallpox thesis, which is quite easy due to the vague definition of the disease and the unsuitable PCR test procedures. This is a no-brainer that can result in a nasty vicious circle, as we have all already experienced with Corona.
The simulation game can therefore definitely result in monkeypox becoming the next narrative, but that is then rather proof of the incompetence, ignorance and blindness of politics and science.
Conclusion
Is monkeypox really becoming the new pandemic narrative? We don't know, but we will probably all find out soon. At least, there are indications that this is the case.
The parallels that already exist between monkeypox and Corona are manifold, and the only question is whether the populations of the countries will really allow themselves to be told the same story again under a different name, and in the process actually fall into the same panic once more. We hope not! However, if we look at what so many people in this world can still be sold after all the contradictions, obvious lies, sloppiness, scientific fraud, outrageous false statements, ridiculous forecasts and completely nonsensical scaremongering (not only on the subject of "health", but currently also on the subject of "peace"), we have to consider that, despite everything, it could also work a second time.
On the other hand, a new epidemic panic has already been tried several times in the past year and a half (unnoticed by the masses). Besides the hantavirus or a new animal flu, there was even talk of a new outbreak of the plague for a short time. In these cases, too, it was always said that there had already been the first cases in several countries or that the disease had so far only occurred in animals, but some "experts" had once again warned that it was only a matter of time, and so on, and so on. So maybe monkeypox will disappear again after a while, who knows.
But maybe in countries like Germany, because of an economic collapse, blackouts, food shortages and other very real problems, soon no one will be interested in any alleged viruses.
But one thing is certain: no matter when the new pandemic narrative arrives and what it will ultimately look like and be called, it will be exactly the same in terms of content and also on a scientific level as Corona, swine flu, bird flu and so many other alleged epidemics that have already occurred. The "next pandemic", which self-proclaimed "experts" say will be much worse than Corona, will never come. It won't come because biology doesn't work that way and never will.
So the narrative will be broadly the same, no matter what the disease is called. The measures, however, will change. They will, if the population does not fight back, certainly get worse. Even more surveillance, even more censorship, even more restrictions on freedom, even more dictatorship and who knows, maybe next time any criticism of the narrative and the "expert testimonies" will be punishable.
That is why, as we have often said, it is also so important to ask the viral evidence question. Those who always relativise the narrative instead of getting to the root of the problem will sooner or later have to get used to the "new normality" of the hysterics. Those who ask the virus evidence question and force the so-called "experts" to finally provide verifiable evidence for all their claims or admit that they were "wrong" will help bring about an urgently needed paradigm shift in medicine that will forever remove any basis for any pandemic claims, any vaccination mania and also nonsense like transhumanism.
Therefore, let us continue. No matter what, our work is not done yet! Stay critical, stay vigilant, but most of all: stay relaxed.
Your Project Immanuel team