Speaking at a White House business convention on 21st March 2022, the US President Joe Biden said:
We are at an inflection point, I believe, in the world economy [. . .] it occurs every three of four generations. [. . .] Now is a time when things are shifting, there's going to be a new world order out there, and we've got to lead it and we've got to unite the rest of the free world in doing it.
This caused a bit of a storm because Biden, once again, used the term "New World Order" (NWO). We are told that there is no identifiable globalist project called the NWO. Apparently, the only people who think such a project exists are "conspiracy theorists." These people are all antesemites, can't be trusted and absolutely must not be heard, or something like that.
In his 1992 article for the Wall Street Journal, titled, How I Learned To Love The New World Order, Biden spoke about "America's proper role in the new world order." His latest statement indicates that his concern lingers, on this occasion with good reason. The US position as nominal leaders of the NWO is under threat from Russia and China.
Politicians, oligarchs and other alleged "leading voices" keep talking about the NWO. Every time they mention it, the mainstream media (MSM) immediately spring into action, eager to "dispel the myths," "set the record straight", defining the term for us. Why do they feel the need to keep doing this? Why are the establishment and their lapdog media so sensitive about the term "new world order?"
The NWO Is Not an Antisemitic Trope
The “New World Order” is a phrase that gets flung around by all sorts of people for a variety of reasons. It is occasionally expressed in distinctly antisemitic terms.
Some people believe that the NWO is a “Jewish plot to enslave humanity.” Very few people who have researched and studied the NWO share this view. It is not supported by the evidence.
Nonetheless, the false allegations of antisemitism, applied to anyone—other than politicians—who talk about the NWO, provides a very useful canard that “debunkers” consistently deploy. As historian Antony C. Sutton pointed out in his exploration of Wall Street and The Bolshevik Revolution:
The persistence with which the Jewish-conspiracy myth has been pushed suggests that it may well be a deliberate device to divert attention from the real issues and the real causes. [. . .] What better way to divert attention from the real operators than by the medieval bogeyman of antisemitism?
The role of the mainstream media (MSM) is to confuse and mislead the public. They do not want the people to know what the NWO really is. They hide its history and generally deny its existence, but if those tactics fail, they exploit the Holocaust to bolster their disinformation.
Antisemitism means “a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews.” That hatred and perception led, in part, to the Holocaust. Falsely accusing people of antisemitism as a way of undermining their arguments and merely dilutes its true meaning. Doing so shows a lack of respect for the victims of the Holocaust and a deliberate disregard for Jewish people and their history.
The MSM insist that when US presidents talk about the NWO they are simply referring to changes in the behavioural norms, regulations and laws that broadly shape international relations. This may be the case, but it doesn’t alter the fact that the NWO has a precise historical meaning.
Given that it is a heavily charged term, is it likely that senior politicians, foreign policy strategists and national leaders would routinely use it unwittingly, without understanding what it means? Perhaps in some cases. But not in all, for it is clear that many presidents, prime ministers and geopolitical experts have referred to the NWO in its proper context.
The Term "New World Order" As Propaganda
In a typical example of MSM disinformation, the UK’s Independent newspaper attempted to cover up Biden’s slip by trotting out the usual denials and obfuscations. The Independent claimed that Biden was simply referring to the “shifting sands of geopolitical relations.”
The Independent did not divulge the reality of the NWO to his readers. Instead, it relied upon the tired slurs and allegations traditionally used to discredit those who intelligently discuss the NWO. It alleged:
[P]ost-war paranoia tapped into much more ancient social anxieties about the possibility of shadowy secret covens engaging in evil [. . .] The Illuminati, the model for all subsequent sinister behind-closed-doors cabals feared by conspiracy theorist [. . .] traces its origins to the German Enlightenment of the 18th century. Belief in such a group plotting insurrection to realise its “new world order” first gained real prominence in the US among anti-government extremists in the 1990s. [. . .] The movement brings together American right-wing militant instincts with Christian fundamentalist doom prophecies [. . .] and has exploded over the last three decades in tandem with the growth of the internet. [. . .] Conspiracy theories have now become a form of mass entertainment on social media. [. . .] [Z]ealots, bored in lockdown during the pandemic, blended ancient anti-Semitic smears with quest narrative mythologies and pop cultural borrowings to worrying ends.
[caption id="attachment_14819" align="alignleft" width="300"] Adam Weishaupt - founder of the Illuminati[/caption]
With his explanation, this so-called “news paper” followed all of the state-approved propaganda to the letter. Mixing genuine history—yes, the Illuminati really did exist—with total gibberish—there is no “movement” of NWO-exposing “extremists”—the Independent managed to fuse “conspiracy theory” with “right-wing” extremism and antisemitism. This is the standard approach to NWO denialism.
By linking the whole hodgepodge together in a word-salad of misdirection and innuendo, the Independent was able to deliver its essential message: people who talk about the NWO do not trust government, and questioning government can only lead to “worrying ends.”
The Independent didn’t offer any evidence to substantiate its conclusion. But then again, making factual, informative statements wasn’t the point of the article. Claiming that NWO investigators are all antisemites who believe in “lizard men” allows readers to safely discount as crazy all the historians and geopolitical analysts who have ever published research on the NWO.
According to the Independent, no one would even bother talking about the NWO were it not for the internet. By claiming that questioning government policy online is “extremism,” the Independent offered its support for the government’s proposed censorship of the internet.
Ironically, the best NWO historians published their work long before the internet was invented. Indeed, the NWO was a hot topic of conversation decades before we took to our keyboards and devices, as the Independent pointed out in one of its many contradictory observations.
Introducing The New World Order
Contrary to the opinions of propagandists and debunkers, the NWO is a defined globalist project. The objective is to establish global governance. It was inaugurated more than 100 years ago. Over the generations since then, it has undergone numerous changes.
Although it wields immense political influence, the NWO dares not reveal its tyrannical and oppressive nature. It must use subterfuge to conceal its intention to control the masses. Its architects know they cannot get away with openly enforcing their diktats: we the people would resist to the hilt. And if we did so in sufficient numbers, there’s not much the NWO could do about it, for, despite its swagger, the NWO is not “all powerful.”
Therefore, we must be controlled by other means. The NWO uses the school system, academia, society, culture, economics, party politics, finance, applied psychology, behaviour modification, censorship, propaganda, war and crisis management as tools to manoeuvre us into accepting its policy agendas. We persistently fall into the NWO’s trap because we imagine our “elected” leaders are making important decisions on our behalf—for our good. They’re not.
The New World Order (NWO) is an idea that was first proposed—though not with that exact name—by Cecil Rhodes’ Round Table Movement. It was envisaged as a secret system of global governance that would be led by an Anglo-American—or transatlantic—alliance. However, it didn’t stay “secret” for very long.
Not only have politicians and leaders of industry, commerce and finance frequently mentioned the NWO in speeches, but it has also been thoroughly exposed by historians and researchers—perhaps most notably by Professors Carroll Quigley and Antony C. Sutton.
[caption id="attachment_14821" align="alignright" width="300"] Cecil Rhodes[/caption]
Even in the early 20th century, when it was first devised, the concept of the NWO wasn’t a particularly novel idea. It was simply an attempt by a Western hegemonic power bloc to establish global domination. As such, it was an extension of the age-old game of empires.
Rhodes’ NWO project was built upon preexisting global power structures. The Venetian bankers and other private enterprises, such as the British East India Company, had already surpassed nation-states in terms of their resources, wealth and global political control. Rhodes’ vision was to convert this private financial power, which he possessed in abundance, into one cohesive system of global rule.
Rhodes was a British imperialist who, alongside his fellow Brits, bemoaned the loss of “their” American colony. The New World Order, which was given that name after his death in 1902, was supposed to reassert British control in the US, with the City of London ruling Wall Street. This is not how the US contingent viewed the burgeoning transatlantic alliance, though. American bankers, philanthropists and industrialists would soon come to the fore. Indeed, internecine struggles have been a consistent feature of the NWO throughout its history.
The NWO that Rhodes and his Round Table members proposed was a hierarchical, compartmentalised, authoritarian structure, designed as a system of rings-within-rings.
It was led from the centre by “the Society of the Elect,” who would oversee, and be protected by, the first ring of power, called “the Association of Helpers.” Consecutive rings were then established, affording the NWO control of financial institutions, multinational corporations, governments, intelligence agencies and military forces, etc.
Only the members of the “Society” and the “Association” had a full grasp of the entire NWO project. Conceptualisation of the whole system among the members of each subsequent ring progressively diminished as their positions moved away from the centre of power. NWO-controlled assets, placed in key administrative, academic, military, media or political roles, only knew enough to be able to perform their required tasks and report accurately back to their handlers.
There's Nothing "New" about the NWO
[caption id="attachment_7402" align="alignleft" width="253"] Prof. Carroll Quigley[/caption]
Tyrants have always sought to impose their authority upon the masses. Just like Sumerian kings or Roman emperors, the leaders of the NWO have pursued exactly the same despotism, though on a grander scale—literally, throughout the globe. As technology has advanced, the NWO’s goal of centralised authority over a global governance structure has become more attainable.
While its manipulation and control techniques have advanced, the goal of the NWO hasn’t changed. The ambition to rule over all is as old as civilisation itself. And, just as there has always been a ruling class, so have there always been people who are content to be ruled.
Our collective obedience to authority guarantees tyranny. The NWO is by no means the first kleptocracy to have cultivated and exploited our compliance.
Like all the empires that preceded it, from its inception the proposed NWO was designed to take the form of a public-private partnership between government and an immensely wealthy “superclass.” Often these individuals and family dynasties have come from the world of international finance or banking, but leading industrialists and media moguls have also been prominent members of this superclass.
Working together, they have been the hidden hand behind the throne. As Michael Chadwick noted in his summation of Prof. Quigley's work:
There really is a "world system of financial control in private hands" that is "able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world." [. . .] They now control every major international institution, every major multinational and transnational corporation both public and private, every major domestic and international banking institution, every central bank, every nation-state on earth, the natural resources on every continent and the people around the world through complicated inter-locking networks that resemble giant spider webs. [. . .] They were responsible for World War I, World War II, [. . .] They have created periods of inflation and deflation in order to confiscate and consolidate the wealth of the world. [. . .] This wealth is now being used to construct and maintain the World Empire that is in the last stages of development. [. . .] The chief architects of this new World Empire are planning another war—World War III—to eliminate any vestiges of political, economic or religious freedom from the face of the earth. They will then completely control the earth and its natural resources.
Elected politicians, and thus the governments they formed, have always been the junior partners in this network. Many candidates for office are handpicked for their malleability, predisposition to corruption or loyalty to the NWO project. With government intelligence and security agencies thoroughly co-opted, the deep state—the “state within the state” or “shadow state”—has flourished.
The political party system is permitted by the NWO because it ensures that electorates can never derail the NWO project. Instead, they are placated with a misplaced sense of democratic oversight. Party politics also keeps the masses occupied and distracted, leaving the NWO to get on with business unhindered.
Ever since the NWO was formed, it has set policy agendas and then installed political puppets who sell the desired policies to the people—no matter who they voted for. Quigley explained the NWO’s approach to party-based representative democracy this way:
The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is [. . .] a foolish idea acceptable only to the doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extreme shifts in policy.
The Leaders of the New World Order
The self-proclaimed leaders of the NWO are drawn from the so-called “superclass.” Their distinguishing attributes are immense private wealth, an unqualified willingness to act ruthlessly and an unshakeable belief in their divine right to rule.
The “old money” dynasties of princes, religious and political figures and families, sometimes referred to as the Black Nobility, have maintained their financial and monetary control for nearly a thousand years. They have been joined, in recent centuries, by banking families, industrialists and, latterly, “new money” from the post-WWII entrepreneurial, billionaire jet set.
The notion of a “superclass” was proposed by political scientist, journalist, businessman David Rothkopf. As a member of the deep state Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (CEIP), among other think tanks, Rothkopf was well-positioned to be personally acquainted with the robber barons he eulogised in this 2008 speech (its title identical to his book, “Superclass: The Global Power Elite and the World They Are Making”):
We’re not looking at just the wealthy; we’re looking at power. And so, the definition that we used was people who influence the lives of millions across borders on a regular basis. [. . .] It’s a tiny, tiny fraction of the people of the planet Earth. [. . .] [T]he really defining characteristics of this group is the nature of the networks, that networking is the force multiplier in any kind of power structure[.]
The “people who influence the lives of millions across borders on a regular basis” have gone by many names, among them “the Rhodes Crowd,” “All Souls Group,” “the Cliveden set,” “the Pilgrims.” Today we often refer to them as oligarchs, thought leaders or stakeholders. The common thread in Rothkopf’s “superclass” is that no one elected them to power.
Their wealth is likely inherited from their forefathers’ war profits. Often it’s the product of nepotism or profits accrued from more recent military interventions. Others have enriched themselves from the exploitation of slave labour or from rigged markets, resource theft, the drug trade, financial crime, usury, etc. Actually, the “parasite class” more accurately describes them.
The New World Order Today
It isn’t clear if the “Society of the Elect” or the “Association of Helpers” still exist. What can be said is that the current global management network is a compartmentalised, authoritarian structure. Everything first proposed by Rhodes’ original Pilgrims remains on track and appears to be nearing completion.
Lately the NWO has been through several iterations and has been repackaged and remarketed in different forms. The COVID-19 pseudopandemic has seen the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset come to public attention. This is simply a new brand for the NWO as the WEF makes its bid to be the central pillar of the Global Public-Private-Partnership (G3P). The G3P represents the current management structure of the NWO.
[caption id="attachment_13786" align="aligncenter" width="640"] Click The Image To Expand[/caption]
The proposed operating system for NWO global governance is technocracy. There are a number of key elements which, once installed, will end the last vestiges of human freedom and place the world’s population under the totalitarian control of the technocrats. In turn, the technocrats will serve the interests of the parasite class, not the interests of humanity.
Democracy will continue in name only, reassuring the masses for a while, in the form of a communitarian “civil society.” Government, working in partnership with private corporations, will encourage civil society groups to “debate” policies. Every single one of those policies will be pre-selected by the technocratic state (termed a “technate”). The apparent political choice will remain an illusion.
The global economy is currently being transformed as new markets are created. As outlined in the 1992 UN Agenda 21 document (section 8.41), the “basis for action” has already been established. A global accountancy system for all business will use stakeholder capitalism metrics to rate assets, ensuring “the integration of sustainability into economic management.”
The rating mechanisms, such as environmental, social and governance ratings (ESGs), will enable centralised global economic planning. These ratings will determine which ventures receive or do not receive investment. Favoured corporate partners within the G3P will do very well as long as they promote G3P goals. Those who don’t will go bankrupt without question.
The ratings system provides a “better measurement of the crucial role of the environment as a source of natural capital.” Natural Asset Companies will transform forests into “carbon sequestration services” and natural water sources into “human settlement resource services” or some such thing.
By claiming that they own nature, the G3P will create new markets worth a projected $4 quadrillion. At the same time, the G3P will remove oil as the base commodity of value and replace it with nature (natural assets). This transformation is called “sustainable development.” It has nothing to do with environmentalism or combatting “climate change” or, for that matter, the original definition of sustainable.
[caption id="attachment_8389" align="alignright" width="350"] Club of Rome: Climate Emergency[/caption]
The notion of uniting all of humanity to work together to solve the “climate crisis” is a contrivance to facilitate global governance. It was fabricated in the late 1980s and early 1990s by the same globalist think tanks that set the world’s policy agendas.
The Club of Rome, the think tank that greatly influenced the nascent WEF, took credit for imagining the perfect global crisis. In their 1991 publication The First Global Revolution, on page 75 under the heading “the common enemy of humanity is Man,” the Club of Rome wrote:
In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. [. . .] All these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural processes, and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself.
This statement expresses two of the core beliefs of the parasite class. One is the assumed legitimacy of their claim to rule, which enables them to imagine they have the right to “designate” a global enemy. The other is their shared commitment to population control. They herd us about like cattle, all the while deciding how to change our attitudes and behaviour to suit their objectives.
The International Monetary and Financial System (IMFS), too, has undergone a transformation. With the introduction of Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), the IMFS it will be revolutionised. CBDC currency will be issued by central banks as their liability, and they will be solely responsible for that liability. In other words, CBDC will always belong to the central banks.
Because CBDC is electronic money, it is therefore programmable money. This means the central banks will have complete control over every unit of CBDC currency. Whether it is in your wallet or not, it is the central banks’ money and they will permit or deny every transaction you make with it.
For example, the decisions you currently make about where you travel have already been restricted by the global policy response to a fake pandemic. If CBDC is fully adopted, you will no longer have any choice of travel destinations, period.
CBDC will enable each central bank’s AI algorithm to decide where its customers (us) can go—and when. If CBDC becomes the only form of currency available to us, then none of us, no matter how much money we think we have, will have any financial freedom.
In order for technocracy to operate, every citizen must be continually surveilled and controlled by the state (technate). The technology capable of doing this is already being distributed globally as part of the so-called Fourth Industrial Revolution (4ID).
The Internet of Things (IoT) will recognize every device that we use and will report that use back to our technate’s data centres. The Internet of Bodies (IoB) will enhance the technate’s ability to monitor us in real time. Combined with the Digital ID that every nation is rushing towards, the surveillance and control of every individual “global citizen” will be centrally managed at the global governance level.
The New World Order, under the current management structure of the Global Public-Private Partnership, is nearing completion. It is a truly global system of governance. There are no leading governments anywhere on Earth opposed to it. All are racing ahead to adopt it with equal enthusiasm.
The Way Forward For The NWO
With Russia’s recent military operation in Ukraine, it has been suggested by some that the Russian and Chinese governments are not prepared to accept the imposition of the NWO. We can only be guided by their major policy statements and their actions. If these are anything to go by, both governments are fully on board with the NWO agenda.
We know that Russia and China are absolutely committed to sustainable development, Digital ID, 4ID, COVID biosecurity and vaccine passports. Russia is ahead of most of the Western nations with regard to CBDC, and China has surpassed Russia, having already started to use CBDC on a significant scale.
On the 4th of February Presidents Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping issued a joint statement on the future relationship between Russia and China. It read, in part:
Today, the world is going through momentous changes, and humanity is entering a new era of rapid development and profound transformation. [. . .] of the global governance architecture and world order. [. . .] The ongoing pandemic of the new coronavirus infection poses a serious challenge to the fulfilment of the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. [. . .] In order to accelerate the implementation of the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, the sides call on the international community to take practical steps in key areas of cooperation such as poverty reduction, food security, vaccines and epidemics control, financing for development, climate change, sustainable development, including green development, industrialization, digital economy, and infrastructure connectivity. [. . .] [We] will further increase cooperation in the development and manufacture of vaccines. [. . .] Russia and China intend to encourage interaction in the fields of public health, digital economy, science, innovation and technology, including artificial intelligence technologies [. . .] Particular emphasis will be placed on the fight against the novel coronavirus infection pandemic and economic recovery, digitalization of a wide range of different spheres of life.
There is no evidence to suggest that either Russia or China wishes to derail the objectives of the WEF’s Great Reset. On the contrary, the evidence points towards Russia and China as perhaps the most enthusiastic and aggressive advocates for the NWO agenda. China is the world’s first technate, and Russia is a major WEF partner, most notably on cybersecurity.
Much has been made of the WEF’s decision to distance itself from Russia and that country’s sanctioned individuals. Notably, this is a “temporary” freeze. It smacks more of political expediency and PR than it does of any genuine, long-term severance of ties.
There is no aspect of the NWO’s G3P-managed agenda that either Russia or China stands against. Their joint statement reads like a Great Reset checklist.
Perhaps this is all a cunning deception—part of a “secret plot” by Russia and China to fight the NWO hand-in-hand. However, it looks far more like a pact between two great powers who are jointly bidding for political leadership of the NWO.
There is no doubt that the NWO was conceived as a project of Western-based oligarchs. In the post-WWII era, it is baring its teeth on the geopolitical stage and calling itself the “international rules-based order.” This unipolar order, centred around the G7 group of nations, with the US-led NATO alliance providing the muscle, has been dominant within the Global Public-Private Partnership (G3P).
Russia’s military intervention in Ukraine, and the G7/NATO alliance response to it, appears to be a watershed moment. Together, Russia and China are challenging the G7 clique with a BRICS-based, G20-focused, multipolar model. It seems they are determined to seize primacy within the G3P management structure.
As a paid spokesperson for the G7 rules-based order, Joe Biden anxiously observed, “[T]here’s going to be a new world order out there, and we’ve got to lead it.” The US-led alliance’s problem is that Russia and China, in league with their BRICS partners, are pursuing exactly the same objective.
Is It Joe Biden's New World Order
The post Is It Joe Biden’s New World Order? appeared first on Iain Davis.
