Visit ArabTopics.com

Imran Khan’s PTI: The New Face of Liberalism in Pakistan

Although people often conflate democracy and liberalism, there is a fine distinction between politics and culture; a democratic system of governance falls in the category of politics while liberalism, as a value system, falls in the category of culture. When we say that Islam and democracy are inconsistent, we make a category mistake as serious as the Islamists’ misperception that democracy is somehow un-Islamic. They too mix up democracy with liberalism.

I do concede, however, that there is some friction between liberalism as a cultural temperament and Islam as a religion. But democracy isn’t about religion or culture. It is simply a multi-party, representative political system that confers legitimacy upon a government which comes to power through an election process which is a contest between more than one political party to ensure that it is voluntary.

Thus, democracy and politics are mostly about matters of governance and economics, while culture is mostly about the social and moral values and the kind of social matrix that we, as individuals and families, would like to construct around us. There is some overlapping between politics and culture but as a heuristic principle this distinction holds true.

When I will discuss the political pragmatism of Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), the reader will further appreciate the fact that realpolitik is mostly about power and rarely about cultural matters.

Let us admit at the outset that Imran Khan is an educated, well-informed, articulate and charismatic leader. Being an Oxford graduate he is better informed than most of our domestic politicians. And he is a liberal at heart. Most readers would not agree due to his fierce anti-imperialism and the West-bashing demagoguery but I’ll try to explain.

Like I said earlier there is a difference between politics and culture; anti-imperialism is a political stance and liberalism is a cultural temperament. There is a theory called “Reflective Equilibrium.” It states that our minds try to create a harmony between our different sets of beliefs and actions. If there is a divergence between our beliefs and actions, it leads to cognitive dissonance. To avoid this cognitive disequilibrium we try to attune our beliefs and ideology to bring them in conformity with our actions and vice versa.

Now, if Imran Khan is supposedly a conservative Islamist, then his mind must be a psychological singularity. A playboy, cricketer-turned-politician who spent most of his youth in the West chasing famous celebrities all over the world, how could he be an Islamist or a conservative? How would his mind create a reflective equilibrium between his beliefs and his adulterous actions? It is just not possible for him to be an Islamist or a conservative. The only ideology that suits his temperament and actions is the freewheeling liberalism.

A clarification here is needed: when I say that he is not an Islamist, I mean that he is not a political Islamist; I am not questioning his personal faith as a Muslim. He seems like a secular and liberal Muslim.

Additionally, it’s not just Imran Khan’s playboy nature that makes him a liberal. He also derives his intellectual inspiration from the Western tradition. The ideal role model in his mind is the Scandinavian social democratic model which he has mentioned on numerous occasions, especially in his Karachi speech in December 2012. His relentless anti-imperialism as a political stance may have partly to do with his personal experience of encountering racism in the West and partly because it is based on facts. What neocolonialists did, and are doing, in Afghanistan and the Middle East evokes strong feelings of resentment among Muslims all over the world. Moreover, Imran Khan also uses anti-America rhetoric as electoral strategy to attract the conservative masses, especially the youth.

Notwithstanding, if Imran Khan is a liberal at heart, what is PTI then? Some of its stalwarts like Assad Umar, Jahangir Tareen, Khursheed Mehmood Qasuri and Shah Mehmood Qureshi also have liberal credentials. Additionally, we need to keep in mind the fact that PTI derives most of its support from women and youth. Both these segments of society, especially the women, are drawn more towards liberalism, than patriarchal conservatism, because liberalism protects the women’s rights and its biggest plus point is its emphasis on the equality, emancipation and empowerment of women who constitute more than 50% of the population in every society.

Regardless, I think that a better way to determine PTI’s position in the Pakistani political spectrum would be to break it down in various components and then analyze them. The Punjab and Karachi chapters (urban centers) of PTI are quite liberal in their outlook; some right-wing politicians even accused the PTI rallies in Lahore, Karachi and Islamabad as obscene in a Pakistani social milieu. Those rallies weren’t obscene in any sense but in a segregated, patriarchal culture the mere intermixing of men and women at public places is also frowned upon.

However, the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (KPK) chapter of PTI casts some aspersions on the liberal credentials of PTI, where it swept the elections from NA-1 to NA-20 and formed a coalition government with the religious hardliners. But the elections in KPK were fought on a single issue: Pakistan’s stance on the war on terror and its relationship with the US. KPK is the war on terror’s worst affected province of Pakistan; in the 2013 general elections PTI stood for dialogue and political settlement with the militants while Awami National Party (ANP) favored more military operations in KPK and tribal areas. But since the residents of KPK have witnessed firsthand the sufferings of internally displaced people of Swat and tribal areas, therefore they chose a pro-peace PTI over a pro-war ANP.

Finally, it appears that the PTI’s supporters in Punjab, Karachi and even KPK’s urban areas have a more liberal outlook while the PTI’s supporters in the rural areas of KPK are somewhat conservative. Therefore my conclusion would be that Imran Khan himself is a liberal but PTI is a hotchpotch of electable politicians from diverse political backgrounds; though it has a potential to emerge as a liberal political party on the Pakistani political scene. In the nutshell, compared to the certified liberal party, Pakistan People’s Party, I would place PTI as right-of-center; but in relation to the right-wing, Pakistan Muslim League, I would categorize PTI as a left-of-center political party in the Pakistani political spectrum.

Source: 
Dissident Voice

Dear friends of this aggregator

  • Yes, I intentionally removed Newsbud from the aggregator on Mar 22.
  • Newsbud did not block the aggregator, although their editor blocked me on twitter after a comment I made to her
  • As far as I know, the only site that blocks this aggregator is Global Research. I have no idea why!!
  • Please stop recommending Newsbud and Global Research to be added to the aggregator.

Support this site

News Sources

Source Items
James Bovard 26
WWI Hidden History 51
Grayzone Project 382
Pass Blue 328
Dilyana Gaytandzhieva 16
John Pilger 423
The Real News 367
Scrutinised Minds 29
Need To Know News 3189
FEE 5245
Marine Le Pen 403
Francois Asselineau 25
Opassande 53
HAX on 5July 220
Henrik Alexandersson 1164
Mohamed Omar 403
Professors Blog 10
Arg Blatte Talar 40
Angry Foreigner 19
Fritte Fritzson 12
Teologiska rummet 32
Filosofiska rummet 137
Vetenskapsradion Historia 187
Snedtänkt (Kalle Lind) 252
Les Crises 3504
Richard Falk 209
Ian Sinclair 129
SpinWatch 61
Counter Currents 11703
Kafila 594
Gail Malone 43
Transnational Foundation 221
Rick Falkvinge 95
The Duran 10943
Vanessa Beeley 197
Nina Kouprianova 9
MintPress 5965
Paul Craig Roberts 2356
News Junkie Post 65
Nomi Prins 27
Kurt Nimmo 191
Strategic Culture 5846
Sir Ken Robinson 25
Stephan Kinsella 114
Liberty Blitzkrieg 879
Sami Bedouin 65
Consortium News 2685
21 Century Wire 3984
Burning Blogger 324
Stephen Gowans 101
David D. Friedman 162
Anarchist Standard 16
The BRICS Post 1536
Tom Dispatch 606
Levant Report 18
The Saker 4924
The Barnes Review 580
John Friend 520
Psyche Truth 160
Jonathan Cook 162
New Eastern Outlook 4736
School Sucks Project 1810
Giza Death Star 2123
Andrew Gavin Marshall 15
Red Ice Radio 664
GMWatch 2544
Robert Faurisson 150
Espionage History Archive 35
Jay's Analysis 1133
Le 4ème singe 91
Jacob Cohen 219
Agora Vox 18623
Cercle Des Volontaires 452
Panamza 2515
Fairewinds 119
Project Censored 1181
Spy Culture 613
Conspiracy Archive 84
Crystal Clark 11
Timothy Kelly 629
PINAC 1482
The Conscious Resistance 980
Independent Science News 87
The Anti Media 6877
Positive News 820
Brandon Martinez 30
Steven Chovanec 61
Lionel 313
The Mind renewed 456
Natural Society 2627
Yanis Varoufakis 1092
Tragedy & Hope 122
Dr. Tim Ball 114
Web of Debt 161
Porkins Policy Review 453
Conspiracy Watch 174
Eva Bartlett 639
Libyan War Truth 361
DeadLine Live 1916
Kevin Ryan 67
BSNEWS 2114
Aaron Franz 265
Traces of Reality 166
Revelations Radio News 121
Dr. Bruce Levine 157
Peter B Collins 1741
Faux Capitalism 205
Dissident Voice 11669
Climate Audit 227
Donna Laframboise 500
Judith Curry 1175
Geneva Business Insider 40
Media Monarchy 2654
Syria Report 78
Human Rights Investigation 93
Intifada (Voice of Palestine) 1685
Down With Tyranny 13248
Laura Wells Solutions 48
Video Rebel's Blog 466
Revisionist Review 485
Aletho News 22449
ضد العولمة 27
Penny for your thoughts 3288
Northerntruthseeker 2687
كساريات 37
Color Revolutions and Geopolitics 27
Stop Nato 4855
AntiWar.com Blog 3372
AntiWar.com Original Content 7527
Corbett Report 2596
Stop Imperialism 491
Land Destroyer 1276
Webster Tarpley Website 1147

Compiled Feeds

Public Lists

Title Visibility
Funny Public