How Intel Chiefs Elevate ‘Global Threats’ to Prop-Up the Imperial War Machine

Once again, U.S. intelligence seers  are hyping the concept of “worldwide threats” in a perennial propaganda exercise designed to paint Russia, China, Iran and North Korea as threats to America’s national security – and keep trillions in U.S. taxpayer funds flowing into the military industrial complex.

Supposed leaders of the vaunted “intelligence community” – Christopher Wray, Mike Pompeo, and Dan Coats. But is the intelligence they are production really worth anything? Is it politicized?

Gareth Porter

The corporate media’s reporting on the testimonies of Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats and the directors of CIA, NSA and FBI on their annual assessment of “worldwide threats” emphasized the fact that they contradicted President Donald Trump’s views on Iran, North Korea and Russia.

Trump foolishly criticized the intelligence chiefs as “naïve” for refusing to support his unfounded accusation that Iran is systematically cheating on the nuclear deal. His remarks buttressed the media narrative of a struggle between an objective intelligence apparatus and a patently dishonest president who may even have colluded with Russia.

But the media’s emphasis on this narrative has obscured a more important story: The intelligence chiefs used the annual presentation of their “global threat assessment” to protect key policies and programs that provide their massive organizations with enormous power and budgetary resources.

The corporate media never discuss the fact that these annual presentations, far from being politically neutral, are used to defend the interests of the intelligence agencies themselves and their main customers – the Pentagon and the military.

The history of major CIA intelligence estimates is proof. During the Vietnam War, the CIA succumbed to pressure from the military and lied about the size of the Vietnamese Communist forces in South Vietnam in order to preserve Gen. William Westmoreland’s claim that the US was “winning” that war. And in late 2010, the CIA again yielded to pressure from the field commander – this time Gen. David Petraeus in Afghanistan – and concluded, despite evidence to the contrary, that Taliban military strength had not increased during that year.

The New Main Worldwide Threat? Russia!

The 2019 “Worldwide Threats Assessment,” like its annual predecessors, approaches central policy issues in ways that protect the interests of the powerful institutions served by intelligence agencies. The result is that the line between intelligence assessment and propaganda is often impossible to discern.

That much is clear from the first paragraph of the introduction to the document:

Threats to US national security will expand and diversify in the coming year, driven in part by China and Russia as they respectively compete more intensely with the United States and its traditional allies and partners. This competition cuts across all domains, involves a race for technological and military superiority, and is increasingly about values.

The elevation of Russia and China to the leading position among global threats reflects the primordial interests of the Pentagon, which announced a major shift in January 2018 from fighting terrorism to competing with Russia and China as the primary basis for planning — and justifying more spending.

Before that announcement, the intelligence community and the FBI had created an unprecedented climate of fear concerning Russia’s supposed ability to shape the outcome of the 2016 election. So it is no surprise that the assessment includes an entire section on the threat it calls “online influence operation and election interference.” It leads with a remarkably specific speculation: “Our adversaries and strategic competitor,” – meaning Russia – “probably already are looking to the 2020 US elections as an opportunity to advance their interests.”

This statement might have appeared more like an objective assessment and less like propaganda had Coats and the other intelligence chiefs not made an a similar – albeit more categorical – prediction in 2018 about alleged Russian intentions to interfere in the 2018 midterm. In the end, despite a statement on election day 2018 that Russia had carried out propaganda during the campaign, Coats and his colleagues never offered any evidence of real interference in that election.

Nevertheless the intelligence chiefs didn’t hesitate to stoke fears that Russia might attack the US electoral infrastructure in 2020. “Adversaries and strategic competitors,” they warn, “also may seek to use cyber means to directly manipulate or disrupt election systems—such as by tampering with voter registration or disrupting the vote tallying process—either to alter data or to call into question our voting process.”

The report repeats the claim that in 2016 Russia conducted cyber activity that targeted US election infrastructure. The Department of Homeland Security created a sensational story in September 2016 that Russian hackers tried to break into election-related sites in 21 states. But an in-depth investigation of that claim revealed that it was blatantly fraudulent, and that there was no evidence of any state-based effort to penetrate state electoral infrastructure – only the usual hacking attempts that occur on any state database in the country every day. The adoption of this line by the entire intelligence community marks its descent further into propaganda on the alleged threat of Russian interference in US politics and elections.

The intelligence report attributes vast powers of manipulation on US society and politics to the Russian state. It suggests the Russians “are now becoming more adept at using social media to alter how we think, behave and decide.” This characterization of Russian social media efforts, taking advantage of media hype, represents extreme hyperbole when considered in light of the actual limitations of the Russian Internet Research Agency’s efforts.

From that stance, it is only a small step for the report to claim that, “US adversaries and strategic competitors almost certainly will use online influence operations to try to weaken democratic institutions, undermine US alliances and partnerships, and shape policy outcomes in the United States and elsewhere.”

The rhetoric about weakening democratic institutions is only a slight variation on a central theme of US and NATO propaganda. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in July 2018 that he had “great confidence that the Russians will try and undermine western democracy in 2017, 2018, 2019 and for an awfully long time.”

The notion that Russia is scheming to weaken US democracy goes well beyond even normal propaganda in its extreme degree of hyperbole. It requires that one deny the obvious fact that the patterns of American political behavior observed in the 2016 election were the result of domestic socio-political developments, not manipulations of brilliant Russian strategists. But the fear that the CIA and FBI in particular have pushed very hard has eased the Pentagon’s task in seeking a big increase in spending in operations against Moscow.

Familiar Propaganda Themes on Iran

Although Iran has been demoted by the intelligence community as a threat in relation to Russia and China, it remains one of the four key adversaries, along with North Korea. The threat assessment restates some hoary themes in US propaganda on Iran over many years. It begins with the decades-long US accusation that the Iranian ballistic missile program “poses a threat to countries across the Middle East.”

This is one of most obvious examples of straightforward propaganda being presented as intelligence analysis in the entire litany of alleged threats. Even Israel’s top expert on the Iranian missile program, Uzi Rubin, who directed Israel’s missile defense program through the entire decade of the 1990s, long ago analyzed Iran’s ballistic missiles as its only deterrent force (since it had no air force), and noted that it was based on the premise that it would be armed with conventionally-armed missiles – not nuclear weapons.

The report goes on to suggest that Iran’s development of a missile, the Simorgh, to launch satellites, implies that it is working on an Intercontinental Ballistic Missile, because the two vehicles “use similar technologies.” But the leading American expert on Iranian missiles, Michael Elleman, has thoroughly debunked that claim, pointing out the technological experience acquired in developing the Simorgh has only “limited application” to a long-range missile.

A notable departure from past US propaganda formulations on Iran is the absence of the claim, included in the 2018 report, that Iran is the world’s “most prominent state sponsor of terrorism.”

The document nevertheless states that Iran “almost certainly will continue to develop and maintain terrorist capabilities as an option to deter or retaliate against its perceive adversaries.” And it refers to what it calls a “probable” Iranian Intelligence Ministry plot to set off an explosive device last summer at an “opposition group gathering in Paris” – a reference to a rally of the Mujahideen I-Khalq — the anti-regime cult-like Iranian exile organization organization used by both the United States and Israel for operations against Iran.

But the brief mention of the incident fails to mention that the alleged plot remains highly suspicious. Belgian police were led to the Iranian couple allegedly involved by Israel’s Mossad. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu immediately exploited the discovery of the plot to demand that EU states call off a meeting with Iran to preserve the JCPOA that was planned for later in the week. And the evidence that there was such a plot consists of the presence of 500 grams of explosive and an initiation mechanism found in a small toiletry bag in the couple’s car.

The CIA’s sleuths might have offered a more objective analysis of that alleged plot, but despite support for the now endangered nuclear agreement, the larger official narrative on Iran remains focused on Iran as a threat to US allies and interests…

Continue this story at Truthout

READ MORE DEEP STATE NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire Deep State Files


21 Century Wire

Dear friends of this aggregator

  • Yes, I intentionally removed Newsbud from the aggregator on Mar 22.
  • Newsbud did not block the aggregator, although their editor blocked me on twitter after a comment I made to her
  • As far as I know, the only site that blocks this aggregator is Global Research. I have no idea why!!
  • Please stop recommending Newsbud and Global Research to be added to the aggregator.

Support this site

News Sources

Source Items
WWI Hidden History 50
Grayzone Project 42
Pass Blue 116
Dilyana Gaytandzhieva 14
John Pilger 412
The Real News 367
Scrutinised Minds 29
Need To Know News 2061
FEE 3825
Marine Le Pen 282
Francois Asselineau 25
Opassande 53
HAX on 5July 220
Henrik Alexandersson 693
Mohamed Omar 294
Professors Blog 10
Arg Blatte Talar 39
Angry Foreigner 17
Fritte Fritzson 12
Teologiska rummet 32
Filosofiska rummet 87
Vetenskapsradion Historia 134
Snedtänkt (Kalle Lind) 194
Les Crises 2263
Richard Falk 136
Ian Sinclair 88
SpinWatch 54
Counter Currents 7475
Kafila 403
Gail Malone 34
Transnational Foundation 221
Rick Falkvinge 94
The Duran 8115
Vanessa Beeley 93
Nina Kouprianova 9
MintPress 5229
Paul Craig Roberts 1370
News Junkie Post 55
Nomi Prins 26
Kurt Nimmo 191
Strategic Culture 4109
Sir Ken Robinson 20
Stephan Kinsella 76
Liberty Blitzkrieg 821
Sami Bedouin 62
Consortium News 2314
21 Century Wire 3188
Burning Blogger 309
Stephen Gowans 74
David D. Friedman 146
Anarchist Standard 16
The BRICS Post 1489
Tom Dispatch 451
Levant Report 17
The Saker 3777
The Barnes Review 496
John Friend 395
Psyche Truth 146
Jonathan Cook 135
New Eastern Outlook 3453
School Sucks Project 1751
Giza Death Star 1694
Andrew Gavin Marshall 15
Red Ice Radio 581
GMWatch 2009
Robert Faurisson 150
Espionage History Archive 34
Jay's Analysis 826
Le 4ème singe 88
Jacob Cohen 202
Agora Vox 12938
Cercle Des Volontaires 425
Panamza 1878
Fairewinds 105
Project Censored 785
Spy Culture 427
Conspiracy Archive 68
Crystal Clark 11
Timothy Kelly 520
PINAC 1482
The Conscious Resistance 674
Independent Science News 70
The Anti Media 6029
Positive News 820
Brandon Martinez 30
Steven Chovanec 61
Lionel 272
The Mind renewed 218
Natural Society 2563
Yanis Varoufakis 876
Tragedy & Hope 122
Dr. Tim Ball 79
Web of Debt 134
Porkins Policy Review 377
Conspiracy Watch 174
Eva Bartlett 574
Libyan War Truth 300
DeadLine Live 1908
Kevin Ryan 62
Aaron Franz 205
Traces of Reality 166
Revelations Radio News 121
Dr. Bruce Levine 126
Peter B Collins 1425
Faux Capitalism 205
Dissident Voice 9966
Climate Audit 222
Donna Laframboise 389
Judith Curry 1084
Geneva Business Insider 40
Media Monarchy 2142
Syria Report 76
Human Rights Investigation 90
Intifada (Voice of Palestine) 1685
Down With Tyranny 10814
Laura Wells Solutions 38
Video Rebel's Blog 419
Revisionist Review 485
Aletho News 18868
ضد العولمة 27
Penny for your thoughts 2805
Northerntruthseeker 2168
كساريات 37
Color Revolutions and Geopolitics 27
Stop Nato 4681 Blog 2836 Original Content 6452
Corbett Report 2173
Stop Imperialism 491
Land Destroyer 1136
Webster Tarpley Website 1019

Compiled Feeds

Public Lists

Title Visibility
Funny Public