Facebook Zero And The “People’s Receiver”

The cover to Norway's largest circulation newspaper, Aftenposten, displayed in Oslo Friday Sept. 9, 2016. Editor-in-chief and CEO, Espen Egil Hansen, wrote an open letter to founder and CEO of Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, accusing him of threatening the freedom of speech and abusing power after deleting the iconic picture from the Vietnam war, taken by Associated Press photographer Nick Ut, of a young girl running from a napalm attack. The Pulitzer Prize-winning image by Nick Ut is at the center of a heated debate about freedom of speech in Norway after Facebook deleted it from a Norwegian author's page.

The cover to Norway’s largest circulation newspaper, Aftenposten, displayed in Oslo Friday Sept. 9, 2016. Editor-in-chief and CEO, Espen Egil Hansen, wrote an open letter to founder and CEO of Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, accusing him of threatening the freedom of speech and abusing power after deleting the iconic picture from the Vietnam war.

All of Germany hears the Führer with the People’s Receiver,” reads a World War II propaganda poster. It was advertising the Volksempfänger – or, the People’s Receiver – described by the US Holocaust Museum which contains one of the radios in its collection in Washington D.C. as:

Goebbels’s ministry recognized the tremendous promise of radio for propaganda. It heavily subsidized the production of the inexpensive “People’s Receiver” (Volksempfänger) to facilitate sales. By early 1938, the number of radios in German homes surpassed more than 9 million, roughly one for every two German households. Three years later, this figure rose to almost 15 million, providing 50 million Germans with regular radio reception.

The radio lacked the capability to receive foreign radio stations, and on its dial, only German and Austrian stations were marked. This – in conjunction with radio jamming efforts – was a deliberate attempt to confine the German public’s access to information to only that emanating from Berlin.

According to archives maintained by Yale University, during the Nuremberg trials after the war, Nazi Germany’s Minister of Armaments and War Production, Albert Speer, would remark (emphasis added):

Hitler’s dictatorship differed in one fundamental point from all its predecessors in history. His was the first dictatorship in the present period of modern technical development, a dictatorship which made complete use of all technical means in a perfect manner for the domination of its own nation. Through technical devices such as radio and loudspeaker 80 million people were deprived of independent thought. It was thereby possible to subject them to the will of one man.

Should a similar dictatorship rise today, seeking to make complete use of all technical means in a perfect manner for the domination of global populations, it is very likely they would pursue similar methods – not over radio waves – but by dominating the 21st century’s primary means of communication – the Internet.


Facebook Zero – the Modern-Day “People’s Receiver”

Two Vietnamese students use Facebook at an internet cafe near their domertary while they could not log in Facebook from their mobile phones because of firewalled on 27 September 2012 in Hanoi, Vietnam. (AP Photo/Na Son Nguyen)

Two Vietnamese students use Facebook at an internet cafe near their dormitory in Hanoi, Vietnam. (AP/Na Son Nguyen)

Facebook Zero is a service provided by Facebook in cooperation with mobile phone services worldwide. It is essentially the ability to use Facebook over cellular phone networks without being charged. It is part of a wider scheme called “zero-rating,” which telecom giants are using to selectively provide content for its users.

It represents the complete circumvention of the concept of net neutrality in which all information traveling across the Internet is treated equally. Net neutrality has become the front line in today’s battle for and against “independent thought,” just as Germany controlling the radio waves within its borders represented a similar battled during the 1930s and 1940s.

How effective is Facebook’s technical control over independent thought?

News outlet Quartz in a February 2015 article titled, “Millions of Facebook users have no idea they’re using the internet,” revealed that (emphasis added):

Indonesians surveyed by Galpaya told her that they didn’t use the internet. But in focus groups, they would talk enthusiastically about how much time they spent on Facebook. Galpaya, a researcher (and now CEO) with LIRNEasia, a think tank, called Rohan Samarajiva, her boss at the time, to tell him what she had discovered. “It seemed that in their minds, the Internet did not exist; only Facebook,” he concluded.

The article reveals that the same trend can be seen beyond Indonesia, across Southeast Asia, Africa, and other regions targeted by Facebook Zero’s scheme. The article also reveals the obvious fact that surveys and research indicate the reality of Facebook Zero contradicts the stated goals of Facebook.

The article would claim (emphasis added):

Since at least 2013, Facebook has been making noises about connecting the entire world to the internet. But even Sheryl Sandberg, Facebook’s operations head, admits that there are Facebook users who don’t know they’re on the internet. So is Facebook succeeding in its goal if the people it is connecting have no idea they are using the internet? And what does it mean if masses of first-time adopters come online not via the open web, but the closed, proprietary network where they must play by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s rules?

This Quartz‘ article would explain – in depth – how services are moving away from websites and toward Facebook – which becomes a problem specifically because of “Zuckerberg’s rules.”


The Modern Day Destruction of Independent Thought

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg speaks at the company's headquarters in Menlo Park, Calif. where Facebook Inc. announced a partnership called on Wednesday, Aug. 21, 2013.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg speaks at the company’s headquarters in Menlo Park, Calif. Aug. 21, 2013.

Facebook is more than just a social media network. When it was first conceived, users were free to follow others as they wished, and would see posts of those they followed in real-time. By 2014, however, Facebook had begun tampering with how users viewed content from other users they followed.

A user’s “News Feed” was now being regulated not by the user, but by algorithms created by Facebook. Content providers found their reach to their audiences plummet – and unless they were willing to pay to reach more users, it would remain that way.

Facebook would attempt to justify this new move in a section on its website called, “Organic Reach on Facebook: Your Questions Answered,” where it claims:

Rather than showing people all possible content, News Feed is designed to show each person on Facebook the content that’s most relevant to them. Of the 1,500+ stories a person might see whenever they log onto Facebook, News Feed displays approximately 300. To choose which stories to show, News Feed ranks each possible story (from more to less important) by looking at thousands of factors relative to each person.

In reality, these “factors” may or may not have anything to do with what is relative to “each person.” And with Facebook’s growing involvement under the US State Department, manipulating political systems worldwide, and its recent pledge to join the war on “fake news,” it is likely these factors will be more related to what special interests feel Facebook should make relevant, than the actual individuals viewing their own News Feed.

In other words, Facebook has constructed a modern day People’s Receiver for corporate-financier special interests – with alternatives omitted from the tuning dials, and lacking the technical ability to receive alternative information from outside Facebook’s carefully controlled information space. It is the modern day destruction of independent thought – an information cage many – like the German people during the 1930-40s may not even realize they’re locked in.

Just as people fought hard to upend the Nazi propaganda machine during World War II, people today are and must continue to confront, undermine, and eventually displace Facebook’s monopoly over modern day communication. Unlike Nazi Germany’s People’s Receivers, Facebook doesn’t taint and skew the perception of just 80 million Germans, but includes a user base spread out across the planet and numbering nearly 2 billion.

Tony Cartalucci, Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher and writer, especially for the online magazine New Eastern Outlook.”, where this article first appeared.

The post Facebook Zero And The “People’s Receiver” appeared first on MintPress News.


Dear friends of this aggregator

  • Yes, I intentionally removed Newsbud from the aggregator on Mar 22.
  • Newsbud did not block the aggregator, although their editor blocked me on twitter after a comment I made to her
  • As far as I know, the only site that blocks this aggregator is Global Research. I have no idea why!!
  • Please stop recommending Newsbud and Global Research to be added to the aggregator.

Support this site

News Sources

Source Items
The high wire 12
Tareq Haddad 10
Please Stop the Ride 36
The Infectious Myth 27
Lockdown Skeptics 124
Sam Husseini 37
Dr. Andrew Kaufman 3
Swiss Propaganda Research 78
Off Guardian 270
Cory Morningstar 10
James Bovard 97
WWI Hidden History 51
Grayzone Project 502
Pass Blue 446
Dilyana Gaytandzhieva 19
John Pilger 429
The Real News 367
Scrutinised Minds 29
Need To Know News 3697
FEE 5618
Marine Le Pen 437
Francois Asselineau 25
Opassande 54
HAX on 5July 220
Henrik Alexandersson 1326
Mohamed Omar 404
Professors Blog 10
Arg Blatte Talar 40
Angry Foreigner 19
Fritte Fritzson 12
Teologiska rummet 36
Filosofiska rummet 154
Vetenskapsradion Historia 203
Snedtänkt (Kalle Lind) 275
Les Crises 4275
Richard Falk 238
Ian Sinclair 144
SpinWatch 61
Counter Currents 13551
Kafila 740
Gail Malone 45
Transnational Foundation 221
Rick Falkvinge 95
The Duran 12436
Vanessa Beeley 246
Nina Kouprianova 9
MintPress 6325
Paul Craig Roberts 2877
News Junkie Post 77
Nomi Prins 27
Kurt Nimmo 191
Strategic Culture 6664
Sir Ken Robinson 88
Stephan Kinsella 133
Liberty Blitzkrieg 889
Sami Bedouin 65
Consortium News 2685
21 Century Wire 4409
Burning Blogger 324
Stephen Gowans 106
David D. Friedman 198
Anarchist Standard 16
The BRICS Post 1547
Tom Dispatch 673
Levant Report 18
The Saker 5456
The Barnes Review 623
John Friend 560
Psyche Truth 160
Jonathan Cook 173
New Eastern Outlook 5214
School Sucks Project 1850
Giza Death Star 2287
Andrew Gavin Marshall 28
Red Ice Radio 715
GMWatch 2693
Robert Faurisson 150
Espionage History Archive 35
Jay's Analysis 1239
Le 4ème singe 92
Jacob Cohen 227
Agora Vox 20737
Cercle Des Volontaires 462
Panamza 2698
Fairewinds 124
Project Censored 1283
Spy Culture 785
Conspiracy Archive 85
Crystal Clark 27
Timothy Kelly 679
PINAC 1482
The Conscious Resistance 1157
Independent Science News 97
The Anti Media 6895
Positive News 820
Brandon Martinez 30
Steven Chovanec 63
Lionel 319
The Mind renewed 468
Natural Society 2627
Yanis Varoufakis 1188
Tragedy & Hope 122
Dr. Tim Ball 114
Web of Debt 172
Porkins Policy Review 465
Conspiracy Watch 174
Eva Bartlett 650
Libyan War Truth 385
DeadLine Live 1916
Kevin Ryan 69
Aaron Franz 286
Traces of Reality 166
Revelations Radio News 128
Dr. Bruce Levine 164
Peter B Collins 1882
Faux Capitalism 205
Dissident Voice 12501
Climate Audit 228
Donna Laframboise 538
Judith Curry 1213
Geneva Business Insider 40
Media Monarchy 2877
Syria Report 84
Human Rights Investigation 94
Intifada (Voice of Palestine) 1685
Down With Tyranny 14281
Laura Wells Solutions 53
Video Rebel's Blog 503
Revisionist Review 485
Aletho News 23836
ضد العولمة 27
Penny for your thoughts 3525
Northerntruthseeker 3235
كساريات 37
Color Revolutions and Geopolitics 27
Stop Nato 4986 Blog 3566 Original Content 7949
Corbett Report 2783
Stop Imperialism 491
Land Destroyer 1375
Webster Tarpley Website 1175

Compiled Feeds

Public Lists

Title Visibility
Funny Public