Visit ArabTopics.com

DCCC Failure/Lucy McBath Victory

Last year, in a special election to replace Tom Price-- who Trump had named to his cabinet (and soon fired him once it became public he was as crooked as almost everyone else in the cabinet)-- Republican Karen Handel beat Democrat Jon Ossoff 134,799 (51.8%) to 125,517 (48.2%) in the R+8 suburban Atlanta district where Trump had only defeated Hillary 48.3-46.8%. Ossoff's candidacy-- or at least the therory of it had set the national Democratic base on fire. Money flooded into Ossoff's online account and he raised $23,600,861.14, compared to Handel's $4,555,808.76. Outside spending was also through the roof-- for both sides. Trump's America First PAC spent $1.6 million. The DCCC spent around $5 million. Pelosi's SuperPAC sept $1.2 million. Ryan's SuperPAC spent around $3.5 million. The NRCC spent around $2.5 million.

Eyes wide open, Blue America endorsed him. Soon after, I wrote:

The vetting process for Jon Ossoff was shorter than normal for a Blue America candidate. I never met him in person and spent a couple of hours on the phone with him over 3 calls. He wrote a guest post for DWT. He checked out OK. And, no he wasn't going to be the next Pramila Jayapal, Alan Grayson, Ted Lieu, Elizabeth Warren or Raul Grijalva. But he was't going to be a Blue Dog or New Dem and his instincts were pretty good across the whole spectrum of issues we talk with our potential endorsees about. He's pro-choice and opposes discrimination based on all the things conservatives use as excuses to demonize people. On economic issues... he checked out OK, as good as you're going to get in the South, at least as good as his mentors, John Lewis and Hank Johnson. As for the other Democratic congressman in Georgia, David Scott... Ossoff is ten-thousand times better. Find me a more progressive Democrat in the South (in Congress) than Jon Ossoff; I can't think of one. I suppose if it wasn't a winnable special election that could significantly put a check on Trump's legislative agenda, we might have dragged it out longer before endorsing Ossoff. But he really is good enough and under the circumstances, absolutely good enough.

Bernie was more discerning and never did go down to Georgia to help. Interviewed by the Wall Street Journal, he said "Some Democrats are progressive and some Democrats are not." Pressed about whether or not Ossoff is a progressive, he, in the words of the WSJ, demurred. "I don’t know."

As his campaign came under the total control of the DCCC I started having second thoughts about the endorsement-- and regretting it. It wasn’t even that he started inching inextricably towards the center really fast, as much as something else I smelled. The DCCC moved in immediately and took over with their crooked money-sucking consultants. Everything I started seeing coming out of the Ossoff campaign started looking bad to me-- the multiple e-mails with no content everyday was an immediate give-away. When I complained, they took me off their mailing list. Every time I asked Jon substantive policy questions for follow-up posts, he wouldn’t respond. By the time he said he opposed single payer, I realized I’d been had by another establishment suck-up. But I generally held my tongue and hoped he’d win just for the message it would send to Republicans wavering in their support for the Ryan-Trump agenda. That was fucked up of me. Because there was another message an Ossoff victory would have sent, one the media would have crowed about endlessly-- how the Democratic Party can only win with centrist candidates who don’t have campaigns based on strong values. "Maybe," I wrote, "Ossoff can now go off and join Jason Kander in whatever he’s doing to push backward centrism on unsuspecting Democrats."

Ro Khanna was kinder: "Until we take a risk as a party in offering a bold economic platform, we're not going to break through in some of these elections. When you try to target things to a lowest common denominator, you run the risk of not having an inspiring message." MoveOn's Anna Galland also grew frustrated with the DCCC Republican-lite approach they saddled Ossoff with: "In the closing weeks of the race, Ossoff and the DCCC missed an opportunity to make Republicans’ attack on health care the key issue, and instead attempted to portray Ossoff as a centrist, focusing on cutting spending and coming out [in] opposition to Medicare for All. This approach did not prove a recipe for electoral success. Democrats will not win back power merely by serving as an alternative to Trump and Republicans."

This morning, the woman who beat Ossoff, wrote that "After carefully reviewing all of the election results data, it is clear that I came up a bit short on Tuesday. Congratulations to Representative-Elect Lucy McBath and I send her only good thoughts and much prayer for the journey that lies ahead for her." These are the results she was referring to:

McBath won on a more progressive agenda than Ossoff's. She wasn't inauthentic or wishy-washy, pulled in different directions by DCCC consultants and staffers dangling millions of dollars. No one would accuse her of being a Republican-lite candidate. Voters seemed to appreciate it.

McBath was vastly outspent by Handel-- around $8 million to just over a million. The DCCC kicked in $134,000, a drop in the bucket, although Bloomberg's Everytown for Gun Safety PACs spent $4 million on the race.

Nationally, the intensity of the feelings for Ossoff and McBath were similar, although Ossoff had far more focussed attention. McBath, after all, was just one candidate of over a 100 who people were excited about. In the district, though... why did McBath win where Ossoff failed? The wave? The anti-Red wave had already begun when Ossoff ran. If anything it had dissipated slightly by last week. The Trump effect? He may seem more horrible now than he did in 2017, but not enough so to move more voters. Maybe I'm wrong about this, but I think the most important factor differentiating the two campaigns is the authenticity factor. Whatever authenticity Ossoff had-- and having talked to him early on, I can vouch that he did have some-- was killed by the DCCC's overbearing, albeit well-meaning, involvement. By the time they get their hooks into a candidate, the candidate is worthless mush, never more than the lesser of two evils, the DCCC guiding principle. Was that worth all that DCCC money and "expertise?" Ossoff may have been elected without them. McBath was.

Source: 
Down With Tyranny

Dear friends of this aggregator

  • Yes, I intentionally removed Newsbud from the aggregator on Mar 22.
  • Newsbud did not block the aggregator, although their editor blocked me on twitter after a comment I made to her
  • As far as I know, the only site that blocks this aggregator is Global Research. I have no idea why!!
  • Please stop recommending Newsbud and Global Research to be added to the aggregator.

Support this site

News Sources

Source Items
Grayzone Project 19
Pass Blue 75
Dilyana Gaytandzhieva 14
John Pilger 410
The Real News 367
Scrutinised Minds 29
Need To Know News 1783
FEE 3414
Marine Le Pen 239
Francois Asselineau 25
Opassande 53
HAX on 5July 220
Henrik Alexandersson 582
Mohamed Omar 256
Professors Blog 10
Arg Blatte Talar 37
Angry Foreigner 17
Fritte Fritzson 11
Teologiska rummet 32
Filosofiska rummet 75
Vetenskapsradion Historia 121
Snedtänkt (Kalle Lind) 181
Les Crises 1989
Richard Falk 120
Ian Sinclair 81
SpinWatch 52
Counter Currents 6638
Kafila 366
Gail Malone 34
Transnational Foundation 221
Rick Falkvinge 93
The Duran 6701
Vanessa Beeley 93
Nina Kouprianova 9
MintPress 4932
Paul Craig Roberts 1210
News Junkie Post 47
Nomi Prins 24
Kurt Nimmo 191
Strategic Culture 3643
Sir Ken Robinson 16
Stephan Kinsella 67
Liberty Blitzkrieg 801
Sami Bedouin 61
Consortium News 2185
21 Century Wire 2992
Burning Blogger 286
Stephen Gowans 67
David D. Friedman 133
Anarchist Standard 16
The BRICS Post 1471
Tom Dispatch 423
Levant Report 17
The Saker 3528
The Barnes Review 478
John Friend 371
Psyche Truth 146
Jonathan Cook 135
New Eastern Outlook 3205
School Sucks Project 1739
Giza Death Star 1596
Andrew Gavin Marshall 15
Red Ice Radio 571
GMWatch 1863
Robert Faurisson 149
Espionage History Archive 34
Jay's Analysis 770
Le 4ème singe 88
Jacob Cohen 200
Agora Vox 11294
Cercle Des Volontaires 418
Panamza 1704
Fairewinds 103
Project Censored 727
Spy Culture 386
Conspiracy Archive 67
Crystal Clark 11
Timothy Kelly 496
PINAC 1482
The Conscious Resistance 581
Independent Science News 66
The Anti Media 5694
Positive News 820
Brandon Martinez 30
Steven Chovanec 61
Lionel 270
The Mind renewed 213
Natural Society 2493
Yanis Varoufakis 825
Tragedy & Hope 122
Dr. Tim Ball 65
Web of Debt 129
Porkins Policy Review 355
Conspiracy Watch 174
Eva Bartlett 564
Libyan War Truth 280
DeadLine Live 1905
Kevin Ryan 61
BSNEWS 1978
Aaron Franz 192
Traces of Reality 166
Revelations Radio News 121
Dr. Bruce Levine 115
Peter B Collins 1364
Faux Capitalism 205
Dissident Voice 9658
Climate Audit 221
Donna Laframboise 364
Judith Curry 1059
Geneva Business Insider 40
Media Monarchy 2026
Syria Report 70
Human Rights Investigation 90
Intifada (Voice of Palestine) 1685
Down With Tyranny 10294
Laura Wells Solutions 28
Video Rebel's Blog 413
Revisionist Review 485
Aletho News 18082
ضد العولمة 27
Penny for your thoughts 2692
Northerntruthseeker 2076
كساريات 37
Color Revolutions and Geopolitics 27
Stop Nato 4626
AntiWar.com Blog 2725
AntiWar.com Original Content 6200
Corbett Report 2103
Stop Imperialism 491
Land Destroyer 1113
Webster Tarpley Website 962

Compiled Feeds

Public Lists

Title Visibility
Funny Public