Visit ArabTopics.com

DCCC Failure/Lucy McBath Victory

Last year, in a special election to replace Tom Price-- who Trump had named to his cabinet (and soon fired him once it became public he was as crooked as almost everyone else in the cabinet)-- Republican Karen Handel beat Democrat Jon Ossoff 134,799 (51.8%) to 125,517 (48.2%) in the R+8 suburban Atlanta district where Trump had only defeated Hillary 48.3-46.8%. Ossoff's candidacy-- or at least the therory of it had set the national Democratic base on fire. Money flooded into Ossoff's online account and he raised $23,600,861.14, compared to Handel's $4,555,808.76. Outside spending was also through the roof-- for both sides. Trump's America First PAC spent $1.6 million. The DCCC spent around $5 million. Pelosi's SuperPAC sept $1.2 million. Ryan's SuperPAC spent around $3.5 million. The NRCC spent around $2.5 million.

Eyes wide open, Blue America endorsed him. Soon after, I wrote:

The vetting process for Jon Ossoff was shorter than normal for a Blue America candidate. I never met him in person and spent a couple of hours on the phone with him over 3 calls. He wrote a guest post for DWT. He checked out OK. And, no he wasn't going to be the next Pramila Jayapal, Alan Grayson, Ted Lieu, Elizabeth Warren or Raul Grijalva. But he was't going to be a Blue Dog or New Dem and his instincts were pretty good across the whole spectrum of issues we talk with our potential endorsees about. He's pro-choice and opposes discrimination based on all the things conservatives use as excuses to demonize people. On economic issues... he checked out OK, as good as you're going to get in the South, at least as good as his mentors, John Lewis and Hank Johnson. As for the other Democratic congressman in Georgia, David Scott... Ossoff is ten-thousand times better. Find me a more progressive Democrat in the South (in Congress) than Jon Ossoff; I can't think of one. I suppose if it wasn't a winnable special election that could significantly put a check on Trump's legislative agenda, we might have dragged it out longer before endorsing Ossoff. But he really is good enough and under the circumstances, absolutely good enough.

Bernie was more discerning and never did go down to Georgia to help. Interviewed by the Wall Street Journal, he said "Some Democrats are progressive and some Democrats are not." Pressed about whether or not Ossoff is a progressive, he, in the words of the WSJ, demurred. "I don’t know."

As his campaign came under the total control of the DCCC I started having second thoughts about the endorsement-- and regretting it. It wasn’t even that he started inching inextricably towards the center really fast, as much as something else I smelled. The DCCC moved in immediately and took over with their crooked money-sucking consultants. Everything I started seeing coming out of the Ossoff campaign started looking bad to me-- the multiple e-mails with no content everyday was an immediate give-away. When I complained, they took me off their mailing list. Every time I asked Jon substantive policy questions for follow-up posts, he wouldn’t respond. By the time he said he opposed single payer, I realized I’d been had by another establishment suck-up. But I generally held my tongue and hoped he’d win just for the message it would send to Republicans wavering in their support for the Ryan-Trump agenda. That was fucked up of me. Because there was another message an Ossoff victory would have sent, one the media would have crowed about endlessly-- how the Democratic Party can only win with centrist candidates who don’t have campaigns based on strong values. "Maybe," I wrote, "Ossoff can now go off and join Jason Kander in whatever he’s doing to push backward centrism on unsuspecting Democrats."

Ro Khanna was kinder: "Until we take a risk as a party in offering a bold economic platform, we're not going to break through in some of these elections. When you try to target things to a lowest common denominator, you run the risk of not having an inspiring message." MoveOn's Anna Galland also grew frustrated with the DCCC Republican-lite approach they saddled Ossoff with: "In the closing weeks of the race, Ossoff and the DCCC missed an opportunity to make Republicans’ attack on health care the key issue, and instead attempted to portray Ossoff as a centrist, focusing on cutting spending and coming out [in] opposition to Medicare for All. This approach did not prove a recipe for electoral success. Democrats will not win back power merely by serving as an alternative to Trump and Republicans."

This morning, the woman who beat Ossoff, wrote that "After carefully reviewing all of the election results data, it is clear that I came up a bit short on Tuesday. Congratulations to Representative-Elect Lucy McBath and I send her only good thoughts and much prayer for the journey that lies ahead for her." These are the results she was referring to:

McBath won on a more progressive agenda than Ossoff's. She wasn't inauthentic or wishy-washy, pulled in different directions by DCCC consultants and staffers dangling millions of dollars. No one would accuse her of being a Republican-lite candidate. Voters seemed to appreciate it.

McBath was vastly outspent by Handel-- around $8 million to just over a million. The DCCC kicked in $134,000, a drop in the bucket, although Bloomberg's Everytown for Gun Safety PACs spent $4 million on the race.

Nationally, the intensity of the feelings for Ossoff and McBath were similar, although Ossoff had far more focussed attention. McBath, after all, was just one candidate of over a 100 who people were excited about. In the district, though... why did McBath win where Ossoff failed? The wave? The anti-Red wave had already begun when Ossoff ran. If anything it had dissipated slightly by last week. The Trump effect? He may seem more horrible now than he did in 2017, but not enough so to move more voters. Maybe I'm wrong about this, but I think the most important factor differentiating the two campaigns is the authenticity factor. Whatever authenticity Ossoff had-- and having talked to him early on, I can vouch that he did have some-- was killed by the DCCC's overbearing, albeit well-meaning, involvement. By the time they get their hooks into a candidate, the candidate is worthless mush, never more than the lesser of two evils, the DCCC guiding principle. Was that worth all that DCCC money and "expertise?" Ossoff may have been elected without them. McBath was.

Source: 
Down With Tyranny

Dear friends of this aggregator

  • Yes, I intentionally removed Newsbud from the aggregator on Mar 22.
  • Newsbud did not block the aggregator, although their editor blocked me on twitter after a comment I made to her
  • As far as I know, the only site that blocks this aggregator is Global Research. I have no idea why!!
  • Please stop recommending Newsbud and Global Research to be added to the aggregator.

Support this site

News Sources

Source Items
WWI Hidden History 50
Grayzone Project 96
Pass Blue 165
Dilyana Gaytandzhieva 14
John Pilger 416
The Real News 367
Scrutinised Minds 29
Need To Know News 2319
FEE 4320
Marine Le Pen 320
Francois Asselineau 25
Opassande 53
HAX on 5July 220
Henrik Alexandersson 815
Mohamed Omar 346
Professors Blog 10
Arg Blatte Talar 40
Angry Foreigner 18
Fritte Fritzson 12
Teologiska rummet 32
Filosofiska rummet 98
Vetenskapsradion Historia 147
Snedtänkt (Kalle Lind) 210
Les Crises 2556
Richard Falk 153
Ian Sinclair 98
SpinWatch 58
Counter Currents 8439
Kafila 417
Gail Malone 34
Transnational Foundation 221
Rick Falkvinge 94
The Duran 9333
Vanessa Beeley 93
Nina Kouprianova 9
MintPress 5514
Paul Craig Roberts 1602
News Junkie Post 58
Nomi Prins 27
Kurt Nimmo 191
Strategic Culture 4553
Sir Ken Robinson 20
Stephan Kinsella 89
Liberty Blitzkrieg 840
Sami Bedouin 63
Consortium News 2495
21 Century Wire 3409
Burning Blogger 324
Stephen Gowans 84
David D. Friedman 149
Anarchist Standard 16
The BRICS Post 1504
Tom Dispatch 491
Levant Report 18
The Saker 4063
The Barnes Review 513
John Friend 438
Psyche Truth 146
Jonathan Cook 135
New Eastern Outlook 3706
School Sucks Project 1765
Giza Death Star 1816
Andrew Gavin Marshall 15
Red Ice Radio 602
GMWatch 2160
Robert Faurisson 150
Espionage History Archive 34
Jay's Analysis 906
Le 4ème singe 90
Jacob Cohen 206
Agora Vox 14389
Cercle Des Volontaires 430
Panamza 2046
Fairewinds 111
Project Censored 918
Spy Culture 481
Conspiracy Archive 75
Crystal Clark 11
Timothy Kelly 545
PINAC 1482
The Conscious Resistance 784
Independent Science News 74
The Anti Media 6455
Positive News 820
Brandon Martinez 30
Steven Chovanec 61
Lionel 287
The Mind renewed 439
Natural Society 2607
Yanis Varoufakis 942
Tragedy & Hope 122
Dr. Tim Ball 104
Web of Debt 138
Porkins Policy Review 402
Conspiracy Watch 174
Eva Bartlett 586
Libyan War Truth 319
DeadLine Live 1909
Kevin Ryan 62
BSNEWS 2045
Aaron Franz 218
Traces of Reality 166
Revelations Radio News 121
Dr. Bruce Levine 140
Peter B Collins 1506
Faux Capitalism 205
Dissident Voice 10356
Climate Audit 222
Donna Laframboise 415
Judith Curry 1111
Geneva Business Insider 40
Media Monarchy 2268
Syria Report 78
Human Rights Investigation 91
Intifada (Voice of Palestine) 1685
Down With Tyranny 11359
Laura Wells Solutions 43
Video Rebel's Blog 424
Revisionist Review 485
Aletho News 19670
ضد العولمة 27
Penny for your thoughts 2908
Northerntruthseeker 2291
كساريات 37
Color Revolutions and Geopolitics 27
Stop Nato 4699
AntiWar.com Blog 2956
AntiWar.com Original Content 6706
Corbett Report 2258
Stop Imperialism 491
Land Destroyer 1163
Webster Tarpley Website 1069

Compiled Feeds

Public Lists

Title Visibility
Funny Public