Visit ArabTopics.com

America’s Shifting Position on Taiwan Is Pushing the World into a Dangerous Crisis

82018010506

It’s rather unfortunate that Murphy’s law stating that “anything that can go wrong will go wrong” applies to the world of international politics just as well. The conflicting positions of the US and China on a number of issues has already become a reason for rising tensions between the leading world powers. Yet, as it’s been noted time and time again, the ongoing Korean crisis is hardly the only matter that can lead to explosive and far reaching consequences. This is especially so considering the situation surrounding Taiwan.

To make matters worse, the US House of Representative has recently adopted the so-called Taiwan Travel Act which, according to Beijing’s Global Times, constitutes a fundamental change in Washington’s policy regarding Taiwan.

Should this legislative act receive approval in the Senate and then be signed in into a law by the US president it would mean that American and Taiwanese officials will be legally allowed to make official mutual visits. The Taiwan Travel Act was introduced into the US House of Representative two weeks before US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, which means it’s unclear whether or not the text of this legislative act was approved by him personally, but it’s clear that it will seriously jeopardize US-Chinese relations if passed.

One can only add that the concept behind the Taiwan Travel Act reflects the position promoted by Stephen Bannon, who was the chief executive officer of Trump’s presidential campaign before being appointed Chief Strategist in the Trump administration, the position that he had to abandon in mid-2017. Bannon was one of the “totally anti-Chinese” representatives in Trump’s team which made him one of the most hated American political figures in Beijing, which is understandable.

The final adoption of the Taiwan Travel Act will mark the second radical step in Washington’s approach towards Taiwan. The first was the adoption of Taiwan Relations Act back in 1979 which strained US-Chinese relations. But the White House then believed that it could get away with it due to the fact it was establishing diplomatic relations with China that same year and felt it could adopt a separate law regarding Taiwan. Before establishing official relations with Washington, Beijing put forward a precondition that Washington could not treat Taiwan as a separate state. However, the above mentioned Taiwan Relations Act introduced a number of restrictions on Beijing’s actions from American point of view. For instance, it prohibits any use of “unpeaceful measures” against Taiwan, while adding that boycotts and embargoes are not on the list of civilized ways of settling disputes.

In effect, this Taiwan Relations Act undermined Washington’s own agreement to recognize the “One-China Policy” .

In the Congressional Budget Office Cost Estimate that was ordered by the House Committee on Foreign Affairs it is recalled that upon the termination of diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, which made all contacts between the US and Taiwan “unofficial”, Washington’s interests on the island were advanced by a private, non-profit body known as the American Institute in Taiwan (AIT). It’s curious that it was located in the same building in Taipei that housed the US embassy prior to 1979 and, quite possibly, was used by the same staff that was employed by the former embassy. A similar metamorphosis occurred within the former Taiwan embassy in Washington, which was transformed into the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office (TECRO).

The draft of the Taiwan Travel Act recognizes the Taiwan Relations Act as the “cornerstone” that shaped the development US-Taiwan relations for over three decades. Nevertheless, TRA-1979 introduced a number of restrictions on official contacts between American and Taiwanese officials.

It means that Washington has apparently decided it is time to expand its ties with Taiwan, especially within the framework of Trump’s “renewed US national security strategy” that perceives China as the principal immediate threat to the US. That is why Washington wants its officials at all levels, including those who oversee security issues within the government, to travel freely to Taiwan to hold official talks with their Taiwanese counterparts. And the Taiwan Travel Act enables it to do just that. It goes without saying that the legislative initiative in question grants Taiwanese officials similar capabilities.

If the adoption of TRA-1979 almost four decades ago could be compared with the removal of the seal that kept the Pandora’s box shut, the appearance of the Taiwan Travel Act amounts to a partial lifting of the lid. Figuratively speaking, should Washington recognize Taiwan as an independent subject of international law at any point in history, this lid will be blown off completely, marking the end of US-Chinese relations as we know it.

It’s enough to recall that until 1971 the “Republic of China” as Taiwan still presented itself upon the international stage was one of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council. But China will not allow the situation regress this far again. It’s rather telling that Chinese President Xi Jinping for the second time in six month was seen wearing a military uniform in public.

Calm and balanced analysis shows that as China transforms into a global power it sends a clear message to Washington that is searching for a mutually beneficial strategy  (a win-win scenario). Within the framework of such a strategy, one can easily find a solution to the problem of Taiwan. For sure, the issue looks much more complicated than the problem of integrating Taiwan into China, as external players voice criticism of Beijing only in connection of the existing democratic procedures in Hong Kong. But let’s recall that before 1997 there was no “democratic procedures” in Hong Kong to speak of.

However, mutually beneficial steps can be made only when US special interests refrain from playing with fire by recognizing that China will continue taking an uncompromising position regarding Taiwan, meaning the Taiwan Travel Act doesn’t look like a sensible piece of legislation from any point of view.

Vladimir Terekhov, expert on the issues of the Asia-Pacific region, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook.”

Source: 
New Eastern Outlook

Support this site

News Sources

Source Items
The Real News 238
Scrutinised Minds 16
Need To Know News 833
FEE 1904
Marine Le Pen 92
Francois Asselineau 25
Opassande 50
HAX on 5July 220
Henrik Alexandersson 347
Mohamed Omar 170
Professors Blog 10
Arg Blatte Talar 36
Angry Foreigner 14
Fritte Fritzson 11
Teologiska rummet 28
Filosofiska rummet 49
Vetenskapsradion Historia 65
Snedtänkt (Kalle Lind) 144
Les Crises 1057
Richard Falk 64
Ian Sinclair 54
SpinWatch 31
Counter Currents 3403
Kafila 256
Gail Malone 24
Transnational Foundation 221
Rick Falkvinge 74
The Duran 4696
Vanessa Beeley 65
Nina Kouprianova 9
MintPress 3014
Paul Craig Roberts 711
News Junkie Post 40
Nomi Prins 17
Kurt Nimmo 191
Strategic Culture 2069
Sir Ken Robinson 13
Stephan Kinsella 39
Liberty Blitzkrieg 702
Sami Bedouin 60
Consortium News 1700
21 Century Wire 2351
Burning Blogger 243
Stephen Gowans 47
David D. Friedman 111
Anarchist Standard 16
The BRICS Post 1293
Tom Dispatch 299
Levant Report 17
The Saker 2551
The Barnes Review 422
John Friend 305
Psyche Truth 146
Jonathan Cook 122
New Eastern Outlook 2499
School Sucks Project 1074
Giza Death Star 1218
Andrew Gavin Marshall 15
Red Ice Radio 528
GMWatch 1380
Robert Faurisson 113
Espionage History Archive 33
Jay's Analysis 534
Le 4ème singe 67
Jacob Cohen 171
Agora Vox 6585
Cercle Des Volontaires 376
Panamza 1209
Fairewinds 98
Project Censored 515
Spy Culture 281
Conspiracy Archive 56
Crystal Clark 11
Timothy Kelly 313
PINAC 1455
The Conscious Resistance 430
Independent Science News 60
The Anti Media 3929
Positive News 791
Brandon Martinez 30
Steven Chovanec 47
Lionel 224
The Mind renewed 191
Natural Society 2391
Yanis Varoufakis 648
Tragedy & Hope 106
Dr. Tim Ball 52
Web of Debt 113
Porkins Policy Review 272
Conspiracy Watch 174
Eva Bartlett 494
Libyan War Truth 254
DeadLine Live 1882
Kevin Ryan 57
BSNEWS 1822
Aaron Franz 153
Traces of Reality 166
Revelations Radio News 102
Dr. Bruce Levine 91
Peter B Collins 1126
Faux Capitalism 203
Dissident Voice 8350
Climate Audit 207
Donna Laframboise 240
Judith Curry 986
Geneva Business Insider 40
Media Monarchy 1625
Newsbud 2255
Syria Report 70
Human Rights Investigation 85
Intifada (Voice of Palestine) 1685
Down With Tyranny 8446
Laura Wells Solutions 15
Video Rebel's Blog 397
Revisionist Review 474
Aletho News 15186
ضد العولمة 27
Penny for your thoughts 2306
Northerntruthseeker 1755
كساريات 37
Color Revolutions and Geopolitics 27
Stop Nato 4474
AntiWar.com Blog 2281
AntiWar.com Original Content 5272
Corbett Report 1854
Stop Imperialism 491
Land Destroyer 1015
Webster Tarpley Website 739

Compiled Feeds

Public Lists

Title Visibility
Funny Public