All options should be on the table with North Korea: Start with negotiations!

By Gunnar Westberg
TFF Board member

April 17, 2017

North Korea was utterly destroyed in the Korean war. The people of DPRK, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, are not allowed to forget that USA considered using nuclear weapons against them.

There are frequent exercises when the population is rushed into underground shelters where they have to stay for days. The perceived, and maybe overblown, threats from the South are an effective way in raising support for the political leaders.

The leaders of DPRK believe that their nuclear weapons will deter an attack from the south. Look at Khadafi in Libya, they say, he gave up his nukes and was attacked. Saddam Hussein had no nukes, he was attacked. We shall not give up the nuclear deterrent as long as we are under threat.

In 1991 USA withdraw all nuclear weapons from South Korea. Subsequently North Korea and South Korea signed the Joint Declaration on the Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, whereby both sides promised they would “not test, manufacture, produce, receive, possess, store, deploy or use nuclear weapons”.

The North Korean nuclear weapons program was mothballed for a longtime. However, the inspections and negotiations were repeatedly interrupted and the whole agreement was several times in jeopardy.

In 1994 the previous US President Jimmy Carter travelled to Pyongyang to meet with DPRK president Kim Il Sung.

Carter announced from Pyongyang that Kim had accepted the broad outline of a deal that was later finalized as the Agreed Framework. Pyongyang was required to “consistently take steps to implement the North-South Joint Declaration on the Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula,” and to remain a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, NPT.

In exchange, the United States agreed to construct two light water nuclear power reactors, and to provide 500,000 tons of heavy fuel oil per year until the first reactor came online with a target date of 2003. Furthermore, the United States was to provide “formal assurances against the threat or use of nuclear weapons by the U.S.”

USA did nor provide the reactors. DPRK cooperated poorly in the inspections.

However, in the last year of the Clinton administration, renewed negotiation created a promising atmosphere for future peaceful cooperation.

Unfortunately the newly elected president George W. Bush abruptly declared that all negotiations had been terminated. “I was confused and angry to see our long and carefully conducted diplomacy being summarily rejected” writes William J. Perry, former Secretary of Defence. (Here Perry’s latest views on this conflict).

From that point on, tightening sanctions and belligerent threats were the methods used on the US side, nuclear weapons test explosions and missile tests on the DPRK side.

Today, the situation is more complicated and dangerous than in the 1990es. At such times, threats of war are especially perilous. Negotiations, while difficult, are necessary to defuse the situation, and will at least buy time.

It is always best to begin with the question: What does the other side really want? What does DPRK want?

Here the core items:

1. A peace agreement.
Why is it impossible to discuss peace?

2. A Korean peninsula free of nuclear weapons.
Here DPRK certainly includes a prohibition of vessels carrying nuclear weapons in the Korean harbours and waters. This comes with no cost for the security of South Korea (ROK – Republic of Korea) or any other party. Nuclear wepons can be fired from the USA, if need be.
However, DPRK will also ask for an end of the US “nuclear umbrella”, the promise by the US to defend ROK with nukes. In strategic terms, this too carries no cost for the security of ROK, if nuclear weapons are abolished in DPRK. The US can lay the North is ashes and gravel again, as in 1950, without the use of nukes.

3. Economic “compensation”.
Aid providing food, agricultural machinery and medicine would decrease the suffering of the North Korean people. And the experience is that North Koran leaders can always be “bought”. The cost would be low compared to weapons. Profit for South Korean and US business should be generously included.

Anything is better than a war.

Military threats carry a great risk for unintended war. Food, CD records and Playboy magazines are without risk. Invite DPRK students and professionals to come and study abroad!

Actually DPRK is on its way to become less and less isolated.

In the long run it will be impossible to prevent the North Korean citizen from learning about the world around them.

Glasnost will come, slowly but surely.

Transnational Foundation

Dear friends of this aggregator

  • Yes, I intentionally removed Newsbud from the aggregator on Mar 22.
  • Newsbud did not block the aggregator, although their editor blocked me on twitter after a comment I made to her
  • As far as I know, the only site that blocks this aggregator is Global Research. I have no idea why!!
  • Please stop recommending Newsbud and Global Research to be added to the aggregator.

Support this site

News Sources

Source Items
WWI Hidden History 51
Grayzone Project 339
Pass Blue 304
Dilyana Gaytandzhieva 16
John Pilger 423
The Real News 367
Scrutinised Minds 29
Need To Know News 3072
FEE 5142
Marine Le Pen 396
Francois Asselineau 25
Opassande 53
HAX on 5July 220
Henrik Alexandersson 1125
Mohamed Omar 403
Professors Blog 10
Arg Blatte Talar 40
Angry Foreigner 18
Fritte Fritzson 12
Teologiska rummet 32
Filosofiska rummet 132
Vetenskapsradion Historia 182
Snedtänkt (Kalle Lind) 246
Les Crises 3345
Richard Falk 202
Ian Sinclair 125
SpinWatch 61
Counter Currents 11233
Kafila 570
Gail Malone 43
Transnational Foundation 221
Rick Falkvinge 95
The Duran 10663
Vanessa Beeley 187
Nina Kouprianova 9
MintPress 5879
Paul Craig Roberts 2246
News Junkie Post 60
Nomi Prins 27
Kurt Nimmo 191
Strategic Culture 5678
Sir Ken Robinson 25
Stephan Kinsella 109
Liberty Blitzkrieg 875
Sami Bedouin 65
Consortium News 2685
21 Century Wire 3917
Burning Blogger 324
Stephen Gowans 98
David D. Friedman 159
Anarchist Standard 16
The BRICS Post 1531
Tom Dispatch 590
Levant Report 18
The Saker 4828
The Barnes Review 569
John Friend 513
Psyche Truth 160
Jonathan Cook 162
New Eastern Outlook 4619
School Sucks Project 1800
Giza Death Star 2081
Andrew Gavin Marshall 15
Red Ice Radio 652
GMWatch 2501
Robert Faurisson 150
Espionage History Archive 35
Jay's Analysis 1105
Le 4ème singe 90
Jacob Cohen 219
Agora Vox 18085
Cercle Des Volontaires 447
Panamza 2451
Fairewinds 118
Project Censored 1086
Spy Culture 599
Conspiracy Archive 82
Crystal Clark 11
Timothy Kelly 618
PINAC 1482
The Conscious Resistance 946
Independent Science News 87
The Anti Media 6877
Positive News 820
Brandon Martinez 30
Steven Chovanec 61
Lionel 305
The Mind renewed 454
Natural Society 2627
Yanis Varoufakis 1068
Tragedy & Hope 122
Dr. Tim Ball 114
Web of Debt 159
Porkins Policy Review 450
Conspiracy Watch 174
Eva Bartlett 635
Libyan War Truth 357
DeadLine Live 1916
Kevin Ryan 66
Aaron Franz 260
Traces of Reality 166
Revelations Radio News 121
Dr. Bruce Levine 155
Peter B Collins 1711
Faux Capitalism 205
Dissident Voice 11508
Climate Audit 226
Donna Laframboise 489
Judith Curry 1167
Geneva Business Insider 40
Media Monarchy 2592
Syria Report 78
Human Rights Investigation 93
Intifada (Voice of Palestine) 1685
Down With Tyranny 13025
Laura Wells Solutions 46
Video Rebel's Blog 459
Revisionist Review 485
Aletho News 22132
ضد العولمة 27
Penny for your thoughts 3232
Northerntruthseeker 2630
كساريات 37
Color Revolutions and Geopolitics 27
Stop Nato 4834 Blog 3331 Original Content 7435
Corbett Report 2543
Stop Imperialism 491
Land Destroyer 1260
Webster Tarpley Website 1143

Compiled Feeds

Public Lists

Title Visibility
Funny Public