The ‘Daily Trump Show’ vs. separation of powers

@media(max-width: 600px) {.adace_adsense_5a2e7a17cee33 {display:block !important;}}
@media(min-width: 601px) {.adace_adsense_5a2e7a17cee33 {display:block !important;}}
@media(min-width: 801px) {.adace_adsense_5a2e7a17cee33 {display:block !important;}}
@media(min-width: 961px) {.adace_adsense_5a2e7a17cee33 {display:block !important;}}

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

It is now held inside the mind of each individual an obvious conviction that governments can only be divided into 3 branches: the executive, the legislative and the judicial. Such division of power has become so influential among political analysts and writers in understanding government that it has often been raised to an absolute fact.

In trying to explain the American government, the famous Madison model of ‘the separation of powers’ and ‘checks and balance’ is immediately picked up. The model rests on Madison’s firm belief that dividing authority among three different branches would ultimately create equilibrium and prevent despotism. Scientifically, the model is sound and logical, for it was made perfectly plain in the medieval ages that governments without constraint slip into absolutism.

Yet it is often forgotten that just as politics is a science, it is also an art – it is a form of communication between the governed and the governors. To understand it, and to understand how ‘power’ is actually distributed, one must also use the imagination of an artist and imagine divisions beyond what is said in the literature. This is not to completely reject the former ideas of government, but to instead allow a little imagination enter the realm of politics.

Walter Bagehot, a British journalist and essayist in the 19th century, used that imagination quite well in his famous work “The English Constitution”. He argued that the real division of powers is that between the “dignified” and the “efficient” branches of government. The main task of the dignified branch is to ‘put on a show’ and win the emotions and support of the people, which for him consisted of the monarchy and the parliament during ceremonies. The efficient branch, on the other hand, simply uses the support of the people to run the country. For the British government, this usually consists of the cabinet and government ministers. To quote Bagehot, ‘every constitution must first gain authority, and then use authority’.

@media(max-width: 600px) {.adace_ad_5a2e7a17ce6b6 {display:block !important;}}
@media(min-width: 601px) {.adace_ad_5a2e7a17ce6b6 {display:block !important;}}
@media(min-width: 801px) {.adace_ad_5a2e7a17ce6b6 {display:block !important;}}
@media(min-width: 961px) {.adace_ad_5a2e7a17ce6b6 {display:block !important;}}

Two centuries later, Bagehot’s argument is used up again by scholars such as Michael J. Glennon, to explain the current American government. He starts his book ‘National Security and Double Government’ with the simple question: why does national security policy remain constant even when one President is replaced by another? Despite Obama’s criticism of Bush’s security policies before he took office as President, his administration still proceeded to walk in the same path as their predecessors. He kept the military prison at Guantanamo Bay open, pushed the United States to attack Libya without congressional approval, and also continued Bush’s surveillance policies.

To explain the huge similarities between Bush and Obama’s security policies, Glennon turned to Bagehot’s ‘disguised republic’ or ‘double government’ theory. It is what Plato would also call as the notion of the ‘Noble Lie’. Glennon contends that particularly since Truman’s National Security Act of 1947, which unified the military under a new Secretary of Defense and set up the CIA and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, power in the American government began to shift. The new ‘dignified’ institutions consisted of the President, the Congress and the courts, while the ‘efficient’ institution came under the hands of the national security.  The President is there to first set ‘the show’, and then the national security uses that show to achieve its policies.

One observer, Justin Douglas, who was a family friend of the Kennedys, confirmed this, as has previously asserted that, “In reflecting on Jack’s relation to the generals, I slowly realized that the military were so strong in our society that probably no President could stand against them”.

Indeed, the public media’s reports of Obama or ‘Trump’s policies’ or that the President has ‘ordered’ the national security to act nurtures an illusion that the power is invested in his hands, when in fact these kinds of ‘top-down’ decisions are often rare.

In fast, decision-making in the Trump administration has been reported by several accounts to be far more informal than what most think. According to Paul Pillar, Trump has become more and more reliant on his military generals, particularly James Mattis, who regularly discusses national security matters with him at the dinner table. This was also common during the era of Lyndon Johnson, where a handful of the president’s top national security officials gathered over a meal to formulate decisions regarding the Vietnam War. Considering the disastrous consequences of the war, it would not be too far-fetched to see the Trump administration fall in the same hole if it proceeds with the same process.

Of course, on all great subjects, much remains to be said. It would still be too shallow to state that governments always operate in that manner, for the role of the President and other actors relatively depends from case to case. Yet it still sheds light on the extreme complexity and fluidity of government structure, and that in politics, there is perhaps far more performance than real action, and more human emotion than practicality.

The post The ‘Daily Trump Show’ vs. separation of powers appeared first on The Duran.

The Duran

Dear friends of this aggregator

  • Yes, I intentionally removed Newsbud from the aggregator on Mar 22.
  • Newsbud did not block the aggregator, although their editor blocked me on twitter after a comment I made to her
  • As far as I know, the only site that blocks this aggregator is Global Research. I have no idea why!!
  • Please stop recommending Newsbud and Global Research to be added to the aggregator.

Support this site

News Sources

Source Items
Dilyana Gaytandzhieva 12
John Pilger 404
The Real News 367
Scrutinised Minds 27
Need To Know News 1165
FEE 2470
Marine Le Pen 187
Francois Asselineau 25
Opassande 52
HAX on 5July 220
Henrik Alexandersson 355
Mohamed Omar 202
Professors Blog 10
Arg Blatte Talar 37
Angry Foreigner 15
Fritte Fritzson 11
Teologiska rummet 32
Filosofiska rummet 59
Vetenskapsradion Historia 103
Snedtänkt (Kalle Lind) 162
Les Crises 1457
Richard Falk 85
Ian Sinclair 67
SpinWatch 40
Counter Currents 4774
Kafila 294
Gail Malone 28
Transnational Foundation 221
Rick Falkvinge 86
The Duran 5553
Vanessa Beeley 77
Nina Kouprianova 9
MintPress 3743
Paul Craig Roberts 938
News Junkie Post 42
Nomi Prins 21
Kurt Nimmo 191
Strategic Culture 2667
Sir Ken Robinson 16
Stephan Kinsella 50
Liberty Blitzkrieg 751
Sami Bedouin 61
Consortium News 1967
21 Century Wire 2607
Burning Blogger 260
Stephen Gowans 64
David D. Friedman 124
Anarchist Standard 16
The BRICS Post 1411
Tom Dispatch 352
Levant Report 17
The Saker 2974
The Barnes Review 443
John Friend 332
Psyche Truth 146
Jonathan Cook 135
New Eastern Outlook 2691
School Sucks Project 1105
Giza Death Star 1377
Andrew Gavin Marshall 15
Red Ice Radio 551
GMWatch 1588
Robert Faurisson 127
Espionage History Archive 34
Jay's Analysis 611
Le 4ème singe 84
Jacob Cohen 185
Agora Vox 8448
Cercle Des Volontaires 405
Panamza 1395
Fairewinds 103
Project Censored 658
Spy Culture 308
Conspiracy Archive 57
Crystal Clark 11
Timothy Kelly 347
PINAC 1482
The Conscious Resistance 471
Independent Science News 63
The Anti Media 4688
Positive News 820
Brandon Martinez 30
Steven Chovanec 55
Lionel 247
The Mind renewed 200
Natural Society 2391
Yanis Varoufakis 725
Tragedy & Hope 120
Dr. Tim Ball 57
Web of Debt 118
Porkins Policy Review 305
Conspiracy Watch 174
Eva Bartlett 529
Libyan War Truth 266
DeadLine Live 1894
Kevin Ryan 60
Aaron Franz 166
Traces of Reality 166
Revelations Radio News 114
Dr. Bruce Levine 97
Peter B Collins 1232
Faux Capitalism 203
Dissident Voice 8861
Climate Audit 217
Donna Laframboise 295
Judith Curry 1020
Geneva Business Insider 40
Media Monarchy 1763
Syria Report 70
Human Rights Investigation 90
Intifada (Voice of Palestine) 1685
Down With Tyranny 9205
Laura Wells Solutions 16
Video Rebel's Blog 400
Revisionist Review 485
Aletho News 16447
ضد العولمة 27
Penny for your thoughts 2482
Northerntruthseeker 1889
كساريات 37
Color Revolutions and Geopolitics 27
Stop Nato 4530 Blog 2478 Original Content 5673
Corbett Report 1960
Stop Imperialism 491
Land Destroyer 1059
Webster Tarpley Website 830

Compiled Feeds

Public Lists

Title Visibility
Funny Public