Visit ArabTopics.com

The ‘Daily Trump Show’ vs. separation of powers


@media(max-width: 600px) {.adace_adsense_5a2d8935b4483 {display:block !important;}}
@media(min-width: 601px) {.adace_adsense_5a2d8935b4483 {display:block !important;}}
@media(min-width: 801px) {.adace_adsense_5a2d8935b4483 {display:block !important;}}
@media(min-width: 961px) {.adace_adsense_5a2d8935b4483 {display:block !important;}}

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

It is now held inside the mind of each individual an obvious conviction that governments can only be divided into 3 branches: the executive, the legislative and the judicial. Such division of power has become so influential among political analysts and writers in understanding government that it has often been raised to an absolute fact.

In trying to explain the American government, the famous Madison model of ‘the separation of powers’ and ‘checks and balance’ is immediately picked up. The model rests on Madison’s firm belief that dividing authority among three different branches would ultimately create equilibrium and prevent despotism. Scientifically, the model is sound and logical, for it was made perfectly plain in the medieval ages that governments without constraint slip into absolutism.

@media(max-width: 600px) {.adace_ad_5a2d8935b3ca3 {display:block !important;}}
@media(min-width: 601px) {.adace_ad_5a2d8935b3ca3 {display:block !important;}}
@media(min-width: 801px) {.adace_ad_5a2d8935b3ca3 {display:block !important;}}
@media(min-width: 961px) {.adace_ad_5a2d8935b3ca3 {display:block !important;}}



Yet it is often forgotten that just as politics is a science, it is also an art – it is a form of communication between the governed and the governors. To understand it, and to understand how ‘power’ is actually distributed, one must also use the imagination of an artist and imagine divisions beyond what is said in the literature. This is not to completely reject the former ideas of government, but to instead allow a little imagination enter the realm of politics.

Walter Bagehot, a British journalist and essayist in the 19th century, used that imagination quite well in his famous work “The English Constitution”. He argued that the real division of powers is that between the “dignified” and the “efficient” branches of government. The main task of the dignified branch is to ‘put on a show’ and win the emotions and support of the people, which for him consisted of the monarchy and the parliament during ceremonies. The efficient branch, on the other hand, simply uses the support of the people to run the country. For the British government, this usually consists of the cabinet and government ministers. To quote Bagehot, ‘every constitution must first gain authority, and then use authority’.

Two centuries later, Bagehot’s argument is used up again by scholars such as Michael J. Glennon, to explain the current American government. He starts his book ‘National Security and Double Government’ with the simple question: why does national security policy remain constant even when one President is replaced by another? Despite Obama’s criticism of Bush’s security policies before he took office as President, his administration still proceeded to walk in the same path as their predecessors. He kept the military prison at Guantanamo Bay open, pushed the United States to attack Libya without congressional approval, and also continued Bush’s surveillance policies.

To explain the huge similarities between Bush and Obama’s security policies, Glennon turned to Bagehot’s ‘disguised republic’ or ‘double government’ theory. It is what Plato would also call as the notion of the ‘Noble Lie’. Glennon contends that particularly since Truman’s National Security Act of 1947, which unified the military under a new Secretary of Defense and set up the CIA and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, power in the American government began to shift. The new ‘dignified’ institutions consisted of the President, the Congress and the courts, while the ‘efficient’ institution came under the hands of the national security.  The President is there to first set ‘the show’, and then the national security uses that show to achieve its policies.

One observer, Justin Douglas, who was a family friend of the Kennedys, confirmed this, as has previously asserted that, “In reflecting on Jack’s relation to the generals, I slowly realized that the military were so strong in our society that probably no President could stand against them”.

Indeed, the public media’s reports of Obama or ‘Trump’s policies’ or that the President has ‘ordered’ the national security to act nurtures an illusion that the power is invested in his hands, when in fact these kinds of ‘top-down’ decisions are often rare.

In fast, decision-making in the Trump administration has been reported by several accounts to be far more informal than what most think. According to Paul Pillar, Trump has become more and more reliant on his military generals, particularly James Mattis, who regularly discusses national security matters with him at the dinner table. This was also common during the era of Lyndon Johnson, where a handful of the president’s top national security officials gathered over a meal to formulate decisions regarding the Vietnam War. Considering the disastrous consequences of the war, it would not be too far-fetched to see the Trump administration fall in the same hole if it proceeds with the same process.

Of course, on all great subjects, much remains to be said. It would still be too shallow to state that governments always operate in that manner, for the role of the President and other actors relatively depends from case to case. Yet it still sheds light on the extreme complexity and fluidity of government structure, and that in politics, there is perhaps far more performance than real action, and more human emotion than practicality.

The post The ‘Daily Trump Show’ vs. separation of powers appeared first on The Duran.

Source: 
The Duran

Support this site

News Sources

Source Items
The Real News 203
Scrutinised Minds 15
Need To Know News 708
FEE 1698
Marine Le Pen 92
Francois Asselineau 25
Opassande 50
HAX on 5July 220
Henrik Alexandersson 345
Mohamed Omar 148
Professors Blog 10
Arg Blatte Talar 35
Angry Foreigner 14
Fritte Fritzson 11
Teologiska rummet 28
Filosofiska rummet 43
Vetenskapsradion Historia 60
Snedtänkt (Kalle Lind) 139
Les Crises 953
Richard Falk 55
Ian Sinclair 49
SpinWatch 31
Counter Currents 3040
Kafila 253
Gail Malone 23
Transnational Foundation 216
Rick Falkvinge 65
The Duran 4422
Vanessa Beeley 65
Nina Kouprianova 9
MintPress 2854
Paul Craig Roberts 656
News Junkie Post 39
Nomi Prins 15
Kurt Nimmo 191
Strategic Culture 1911
Sir Ken Robinson 13
Stephan Kinsella 36
Liberty Blitzkrieg 686
Sami Bedouin 59
Consortium News 1661
21 Century Wire 2285
Burning Blogger 237
Stephen Gowans 47
David D. Friedman 108
Anarchist Standard 16
The BRICS Post 1276
Tom Dispatch 290
Levant Report 17
The Saker 2463
The Barnes Review 415
John Friend 299
Psyche Truth 146
Jonathan Cook 122
New Eastern Outlook 2392
School Sucks Project 1065
Giza Death Star 1156
Andrew Gavin Marshall 15
Red Ice Radio 526
GMWatch 1350
Robert Faurisson 113
Espionage History Archive 33
Jay's Analysis 520
Le 4ème singe 67
Jacob Cohen 156
Agora Vox 6056
Cercle Des Volontaires 370
Panamza 1133
Fairewinds 93
Project Censored 505
Spy Culture 270
Conspiracy Archive 55
Crystal Clark 11
Timothy Kelly 303
PINAC 1438
The Conscious Resistance 413
Independent Science News 59
The Anti Media 3850
Positive News 770
Brandon Martinez 30
Steven Chovanec 47
Lionel 224
The Mind renewed 189
Natural Society 2391
Yanis Varoufakis 631
Tragedy & Hope 105
Dr. Tim Ball 52
Web of Debt 111
Porkins Policy Review 263
Conspiracy Watch 174
Eva Bartlett 490
Libyan War Truth 247
DeadLine Live 1877
Kevin Ryan 56
BSNEWS 1805
Aaron Franz 152
Traces of Reality 166
Revelations Radio News 101
Dr. Bruce Levine 89
Peter B Collins 1103
Faux Capitalism 203
Dissident Voice 8169
Climate Audit 204
Donna Laframboise 232
Judith Curry 974
Geneva Business Insider 40
Media Monarchy 1584
Newsbud 2203
Syria Report 70
Human Rights Investigation 85
Intifada (Voice of Palestine) 1685
Down With Tyranny 8227
Laura Wells Solutions 15
Video Rebel's Blog 396
Revisionist Review 469
Aletho News 14878
ضد العولمة 27
Penny for your thoughts 2265
Northerntruthseeker 1719
كساريات 37
Color Revolutions and Geopolitics 27
Stop Nato 4444
AntiWar.com Blog 2232
AntiWar.com Original Content 5169
Corbett Report 1829
Stop Imperialism 491
Land Destroyer 1005
Webster Tarpley Website 714

Compiled Feeds

Public Lists

Title Visibility
Funny Public