Fredrick Töben and I have recently exchanged comments via e-mail, which I reproduce here in their entirety.July 10, RF to FTThank you, Fredrick, for defending me. Very best wishes.July 11, FT to RFRobert, I just don’t understand why Fritz continues in this mode – without Faurisson there is no Revisionism; without Berg, there is relief for Revisionists.Your presence and your work is vital – as it was for me those many years ago when we first met!
Fredrick Töben and I have recently exchanged comments via e-mail, which I reproduce here in their entirety.July 10, RF to FTThank you, Fredrick, for defending me. Very best wishes.July 11, FT to RFRobert, I just don’t understand why Fritz continues in this mode – without Faurisson there is no Revisionism; without Berg, there is relief for Revisionists.Your presence and your work is vital – as it was for me those many years ago when we first met!
Having read the French version of my article of March 8, 2016 about the cat that, in Canada in 1936, allegedly caused the gas chamber in which it was set to be killed to explode, the American Hadding Scott has made a fitting observation, for which I thank him.
Having read the French version of my article of March 8, 2016 about the cat that, in Canada in 1936, allegedly caused the gas chamber in which it was set to be killed to explode, the American Hadding Scott has made a fitting observation, for which I thank him.
