You are here
Donna Laframboise
2 days after lawyer is sentenced to 33 years, Iran appointed to women's rights committee.
News organizations have turned their own journalists into WWF cheerleaders.
A year-long BuzzFeed investigation accuses the WWF of horrific human rights abuses.
How many birds should we slaughter in the name of saving the planet?
Tourists who eschew vaccination are reintroducing disease to less affluent countries.
Everyone's standard of living drops as daily necessities become more costly.
Journalists who specialize in the UN are rare; George Russell’s retirement is unhappy news.
An obscure UN body established to rebuild WW2 Europe, is now determining international automobile brake standards.
UN committee rejects educational progress, refuses to respect the choices of the poor.
Instructs UK to stop assisting parent-financed schools - under the guise of enforcing the International Convention on the Rights of the Child.
If I were trying to parody intrusive UN behaviour could I have invented a more absurd document?
Nations have been demoted; on the top level of the org chart we now find the Borg.
Lecturing democratic nations. How dare they.
Goodbye self-determination. Hello authoritarian conformity.
You'll eat those vegetables - or else.
Medical journals are supposed to be the opposite of fake news.
Good intentions aren't enough. Once broken, some things cannot be mended.
A nation's voters decide their own fate, but only their own.
A report outlines a dystopian future in which EU citizens find themselves outnumbered 7 to 1 by recent arrivals. This is cultural genocide.
Economic migrants are distinct from refugees running for their lives. But the two are increasingly blurred.
Vilifying climate heretics remains socially acceptable.
Your moral & financial support has been a blessing.
Jack Crompton, the mayor of Whistler, has damaged his community but gained nothing.
If you're a UN bureaucrat, recent weeks have been full of disappointment.
Presidents and Prime Ministers come and go. The smug, bloated, out-of-touch UN machine persists.
Norway champions free speech, firmly rejects migration as a human right.
Ordinary people loathe carbon taxes - and might bring down your government.
Which parts of this agreement do our governments intend to implement? Which parts do they repudiate?
A historic agreement to 'strengthen migrant rights' doesn't explain who qualifies.
If a journal’s decision can make or break your career, its employees wield extraordinary power.
Yellow vests imposed on motorists become powerful anti-government symbol.
The current system gives some scientific errors high prestige packaging
It's no longer accurate to talk about the developed vs the developing world.
Long the whipping boy of environmentalists, the Industrial Revolution lifted humanity out of misery and squalor.
Concern about global warming is dead last amongst 16 priorities.
Spending scarce resources on a separate collection system for material no one wants isn't sensible.
Attempting to understand why people vote the way they do is more useful than sneering at half a country’s population.
Scientists score lower than chimpanzees when quizzed about basic, state-of-the-world facts.
Scores of scientific minds. So much tomfoolery.
No matter how undemocratic, impoverished, sparsely-populated, or terrorism-promoting a nation might be, a sentence written by scientists will not survive if that nation objects.
On what planet is it OK for politically-determined definitions to supersede those written by actual scientists?
The IPCC publishes the citizenship and gender of its authors - but says nothing about their scientific expertise.
The latest IPCC report was a setup - a cynical ploy to produce alarmist media headlines that succeeded beautifully.
November 2000 and December 2009 were both supposed to be our last, best chance to save the planet from climate disaster. This week, the media is once again spreading this message.
If climate research is like other research, half of the IPCC's 6,000 academic citations are dubious.
Hundreds of women insist the current US Supreme Court nominee is tremendously supportive of female equality. Why doesn’t every news story offer us a chance to believe them?
Last week, in a sickening spectacle, grownups behaved as though a vague, wholly unproven story involving teenagers 30+ years ago is relevant to whether a candidate is fit to be a US Supreme Court judge.
The most smug, most self-indulgent, least curious journalists in history.
Pages
Support this site
News Sources
Other Sources
Compiled Feeds
Mobile Application
Public Lists
| Title | Visibility |
|---|---|
| Funny | Public |